COMMON
NAMES
23.
Common Names :
Parushni
River : Euphrates, Puranunu or Puratti.
Upper
Euphrates or Omiras : The Vimur River of the Eddas
Prishni
: This Prishni is evidently King Vrishni of the collateral Panch
Dynasty in Maghya Land. being the clan title of Cedi or Cidi, which
branched off with the third brother of King MadgaI (see col. 3 in
Table. App. I). He was contemporary with Su-Dasa's father and also
as now seen with Su-Dasa himself, and was therefore a "cousin"
of the latter.
Vrishni
: A cousin of Su-Dasa's father in the collateral dynasty
of the Cedi or Cidi branch of the Panch or "Phoenicians."
Su-Dasa
: Tritsus, King Tarsi of Kish or Tarsa-Dasyu
Trusus
: The King's own warrior-people are called Trusus
Akkadian
Pashishutu : "a class of anointing priests" in
Mesopotamia
Iaut
Land : The Land of the Mouth of the Iatu River or Nile,
Land of Egypt
Nile
: Iatur
Muru,
Marutt or Amorite Land : Northern Syria
Nilu
: Assyrian meaning "Flood or high-tide water'"
and bani = "beget"
Upper
and Lower Egypt : Lower Egypt was called Itur-meh and Upper
Egypt was ltur-res
Sumerian
word Baru : Priest
Dashrath
and Ram :
The
name of the sixth king Dash-ash-i-urash is made Dasha-ratha. meaning
"The Charioteer of the Ten (horses)." which was a favourite
heroic and royal Indian name. Several of the names possess the same
meaning in Sumerian and Indian, again illustrating the essential
identity of the two.
Thus
the seventh king's after-name of Sin or "The Moon" is
spelt in the Indian Chandra. an expanded dialectic fonn of Sin and
also meaning "The Moon".
Moreover
this king's front name of Amar is obviously the Sumerian source
of his Indian name of Ram, by the transposing of letters or metathesis,
which is recognized as sometimes occurring for reasons of euphony.
As further confirming the identities of this dynasty with the Indian,
it is significant that kings Nos. 3, 6 and 7, who are the only ones
detailed in the Indian Epics, are described as incarnate gods, or
having become" gods," and thus in keeping with the Isin
dynastic lists and the monuments of these kings which call them
"gods".
Name of founder of Isin Dynasty in Sumerian & Indian
& his Title "Ashurra" :
The
first king of this dynasty, bearing the name of Ishbi Ashurra or
Ashira, immediately succeeded Il-Ibil-Sin in the Babylonian lists,
and thus equates with the Indian-list king Vishva-Saha, who immediately
succeeded King Ilivila in the Indian lists. And his personal Sumerian
name I shbi substantially equates phonetically with his personal
Indian name Vishva.
His
title Ashurra here now appears to disclose the source of the later
patron and national god-name of Ashur, adopted by the Assyrians,
and which they applied to their land and nation, and used as a personal
name for many of their later kings. And this particular king is
given the title "god" in the Isin lists.
The
god Ashur was a form of the Sun-god and was essentially a monotheistic
god and he is now disclosed as identical with Asura of the Indian
mythology. Asura or "The divine" was a title of the father-god
Indra in Indian religion and it is admitted by Sanskritists to be
the equivalent of Ahura, the title of the Sun-god in the Zoroastrianism
of the Persians and Ashira is also a title of the Sun in Sanskrit,
and the Sumerian word in question also reads Ashira.
Though
later on, with the growth of sectarianism and rival creeds, this
name came to be given the opposite meaning of "titanic demon"
by the Brahmans presumably because its monotheistic ideal was repellent
to them as intolerably unorthodox and pagan. This is analogous to
what happened amongst the Persians who latterly stigmatized Indra
as "a demon" and as one who opposed their Sun-cult.
Similarly
his Indian title of Saha is significant also of his identity. This
word means in Sanskrit "the mighty, over-coming victorious"
and it is seen to be the equivalent of his title in the Assyrio-Babylouian
Omen-texts of "a king without rivals". This Indian Saha
also spelt Sahas is also important as disclosing its derivation
from the Sumerian.
Aryan
philologists are agreed that this Saha "victorious" word
is cognate with the Gothic Sig. Sigis, Anglo-Saxon Sige and German
Sieg "Victory". All these along with Saha or Sahas. are
now disclosed to be derived from the Sumerian Sag, Zag or Sig "Victory"
written by the Axe-sign.
His
Identity with Uspia, the First Traditional King of Assyria, hitherto
of Unknown Origin & Date :
His
title of Ashurra or Ashura, as well as the Asbar title of his great-grandson
suggests his relationship with Assyria and his personal name is
now seen by the Table to identify him with the first traditional
king of Assyria, Uspia, who significantly bears a Sumerian and not
a Semitic name. This king Uspia has hitherto only been known as
a traditional "prehistoric" Assyrian king and according
to the records of the later Assyrian kings, the first king of Assyria.
His origin, affinities and date have alike been unknown, though
it was inferred that he could not have lived long before the rise
of the First Dynasty of Babylon, which succeeded that of Isin.
Now
his identity with the first king of the Isin Dynasty fixes his date
and affinities. This identity is con firmed by the other stray "prehistoric"
Assyrian king Ititi being disclosed by our Table as the 9th Isin
king, and identical with King Atithi of the Indian lists. And the
other early Assyrian Tung, the so-called "Shamshi Adad I"
but whose name reads Dagshi-ash Muru, is seen by our Table to he
obviously the 6th Isin king Dashashi Urash, who is called in the
Isin records a Muru or Amorite.
We
thus obtain for his name the following equivalent phonetic spellings
in the Sumerian, Assyrian and Indian lists respectively :
Sumerian
Assyrian Indian :
Ishbi
(Ashurra) = Uspia (of Assyria) = Vishva (-Saha)
which
thus establishes his identity.
(Dashashi
Uruash or Dashrath was a Muru or Amorite making him north Aryan
Sumerian of Upper Syria and the Levant. He captured Isin from 5th
king of that dynasty.)
Sixth
Isin King and his son as Dasharatha & Ram Chandra of the Indian
Lists & the "Ramyana" Romance :
The evidence for the identity of the sixth and seventh kings of
the Isin Dynasty with the famous Indo-Aryan kings Dasha-ratha and
his still more famous son Ram Chandra of the celebrated Indian romance,
the Ramyana, is positive and conclusive. The identity is fixed by
the identity of the chronological position in both lists, lsin and
Indian. as well as by the names and their relationships; and the
achievements of these two kings are also of the same general kind
in the Indian romance and in the Babylonian records.
King
Dasharatha was a Sun-worshipper and the sixtieth descendant in the
direct line from the first king of the Solar line Ikshvaku, that
is Ukusi of Ukh or Akshak of the Kish Chronicle, as we have seen,
and the sixth king from Ilivila. He was the paramount Aryan king
at the imperial capital of his time. called in the Indian epics
Ayodhya. His inveterate enemy with whom he warred was Ravan, king
of Lanka.
As Dashashi Uruash, the sixth king of this Isin Dynasty, he is called
a Muru or Amorite, which presumes that he was of the northern Aryan
"Sumerian" stock from Upper Syria and the Levant; and
he is said to have captured Isin from the fifth king of that dynasty.
He had no dominion over Larsa, the city-state low down in the swampy
Delta under a local king Gungunu. who also claimed the imperial
title, and which was probably the enemy-state of Lanka of the Indian
epics, against which Dasharatha and his son warred and against whose
encroachments they defended themselves.
In his own extant inscriptions he claims to be "King of Isin.
Kiengi and Uri ("Sumer and Akkad"), Lord of Erech,benefactor
of Nippur (the Sun-temple city), Ur and Eridu". And he reigned
for the fairly long period of 28 years.
He was succeeded by his son, Amar-Sin or "Amar of the Moon,"
the so-called "Bur Sin II" of Semites. He is seen to be
identical with King Dasharatha's son (by his queen Kausalya) and
successor Ram Chandra, or "Ram of the Moon," wherein "Ram"
is obviously coined from the Sumerian Amar by the Brahmans transposing
the letters of a word, i.e. by metathesis. This king, who gives
himself in his inscriptions and is given in the Isin lists the prefixed
title of "god," was and is significantly regarded by the
Indians as a man-god, and as the incarnation of his namesake Parashu
Rli.ma, the "Bur Sin I" of Semites, as we have seen; and
significantly this king is similarly called by the Semites "Bur
Sin II". In his inscriptions at Nippur and elsewhere he bears
the same territorial titles as his father, and he states that he
repaired the wall of Isin City. He reigned 21 years.
In view of his great traditional importance in India as the most
popular of all the "men-gods" or incarnate gods of Indian
mythology, I give here one of his own actual inscriptions as the
historical king of lsin, etc. He records therein :
"The
god Amar Sin, The Good Shepherd of Nippur,
The Mighty Shepherd of Ur,
The Restorer of the Oracle-Tree of Urdu City,
The Lord who delivers the commands of Erech,
King of lsin, King of Kiengi and Uriki (Akkad),
The glorious . . . husband of the goddess Innanna."
Here
it is noteworthy that he bears besides the divine title also the
man-god title of "The Good Shepherd," claims to be the
husband of the Mother-goddess, and restores the famous "oracle-tree
of the well of Urd" of the Semitic Chaldean Mother-cuit, as
fully described in the Gothic Eddas. As Ram Chandra, the prince
of Ayodhya (Agudu), he is the hero of the fascinating Indian romance,
the Ramyana, or "Adventures of Ram." This relates his
heroic adventures and prodigies of valour as an invincible knight-errant
slaying dragon pests, his winning the hand of the fair princess
Sita, daughter of King Janak of Videha, in a tournament of knightly
wooers, his banishment for fourteen years by his father at the instigation
of the latter's intriguing, jealous second wife, his accompaniment
by his devoted wife Sita in his wanderings in exile; the birth of
his two sons, his refusal to return on the death of his father till
the full term of banishment is over, the capture and ravishment
of Sita by the Lanka king, her eventual recapture by Ram and killing
of that king, on the building of "Ram's Bridge" across
the straits, his reconciliation with Sita, his regaining his father's
throne and having afterwards a long and glorious reign.
This romance, however, was composed in India only about the fifth
century B.C. by the poet Valmiki, and a considerable part of it
is later. It is largely unhistorical and full of anachronisms. It
brings in as contemporaries King Janak, who, we have seen, was No.
26 in the main list, about eight centuries previously, also the
priest Vishvamitra of the Guti period and Parashu Ram of the Ur
Dynasty. And all the scenes are laid within India, and Lanka is
the adjoining island of Ceylon to the south. Besides, the name "Ram
Chandra" seems to have been equated to that of Rim Sin, a later
king of Larsa, seven or eight generations later than Ram Chandra,
and not in the main or imperial line of kings, and who was the great
enemy of Khammurabi of the First Babylonian Dynasty.
But his chronological position in the lists in strict agreement
with the Isin lists, and in his name and father's name and achievements
fixes the identity of the historical original of Ram Chandra with
the seventh king of the Isin Dynasty.
Having now found how the "Amorite" element came into this
dynasty with the sixth king, we resume the examination of the first
king of this dynasty.