VAJRA
OF ADAM / THOR / INDRA
10.
Vajra of Adam / Thor / Indra :
A
vajra is a ritual weapon symbolizing the properties of a diamond
(indestructibility) and a thunderbolt (irresistible force).
The
vajra is a type of club with a ribbed spherical head. The ribs may
meet in a ball-shaped top, or they may be separate and end in sharp
points with which to stab. The vajra is the weapon of the Indian
Vedic rain and thunder-deity Indra, and is used symbolically by
the dharma traditions of Aryans, often to represent firmness of
spirit and spiritual power.
According
to the Indian mythology, vajra is considered as one of the most
powerful weapons in the universe. The use of the vajra as a symbolic
and ritual tool spread from the Aryans (Arya) to other religions
in India and other parts of Asia.
Early
descriptions :
Rigved :
The earliest mention of the vajra is in the Rigved, part of the
four Vedas. It is described as the weapon of Indra, the chief among
Gods. Indra is described as using the vajra to kill sinners and
ignorant persons. The Rigved states that the weapon was made for
Indra by Tvastar, the maker of divine instruments. The associated
story describes Indra using the vajra, which he held in his hand,
to slay the asura Vritra, who took the form of a serpent.
On
account of his skill in wielding the vajra, some epithets used for
Indra in the Rigved were Vajrabhrit (bearing the vajra), Vajrivat
or Vajrin (armed with the vajra), Vajradaksina (holding the vajra
in his right hand), and Vajrabahu or Vajrahasta (holding the vajra
in his hand). The association of the Vajra with Indra was continued
with some modifications in the later Puranic literature, and in
Buddhist works. Buddhaghosha, a major figure of Theravada Buddhism
in the 5th century, identified the Bodhisattva Vajrapani with Indra.
Purans
:
Many
later purans describe the vajra, with the story modified from the
Rigvedic original. One major addition involves the role of the Sage
Dadhichi. According to one account, Indra, the king of the devtas
was once driven out of devlok by an asura named Vritra. The asura
was the recipient of a boon whereby he could not be killed by any
weapon that was known till the date of his receiving the boon and
additionally that no weapon made of wood or metal could harm him.
[self-published source?] Indra, who had lost all hope of recovering
his kingdom was said to have approached Shiv who could not help
him. Indra along with Shiv and Brahma went to seek the aid of Vishnu.
Vishnu revealed to Indra that only the weapon made from the bones
of Dadhichi would defeat Vritra. Indra and the other deva therefore
approached the sage, whom Indra had once beheaded, and asked him
for his aid in defeating Vritra. Dadhichi acceded to the devta's
request but said that he wished that he had time to go on a pilgrimage
to all the holy rivers before he gave up his life for them. Indra
then brought together all the waters of the holy rivers to Naimisha
Forest, thereby allowing the sage to have his wish fulfilled without
a further loss of time. Dadhichi is then said to have given up his
life by the art of yoga after which the gods fashioned the vajrayudh
from his spine. This weapon was then used to defeat the asur, allowing
Indra to reclaim his place as the king of devlok.
Another
version of the story exists where Dadhichi was asked to safeguard
the weapons of the gods as they were unable to match the arcane
arts being employed by the asura to obtain them. Dadhichi is said
to have kept at the task for a very long time and finally tiring
of the job, he is said to have dissolved the weapons in sacred water
which he drank. The devtas returned a long time later and asked
him to return their weapons so that they might defeat the asura,
headed by Vritra, once and for all. Dadhichi however told them of
what he had done and informed them that their weapons were now a
part of his bones. However, Dadhichi, realising that his bones were
the only way by which the devats could defeat the asur willingly
gave his life in a pit of mystical flames he summoned with the power
of his austerities. Brahma is then said to have fashioned a large
number of weapons from Dadhichi's bones, including the vajrayudh,
which was fashioned from his spine. The deva are then said to have
defeated the asura using the weapons thus created.
There
have also been instances where the war god Skand (Kartikeya) is
described as holding a vajra. Skand is also the name of a bodhisattva
in Mahayana Buddhism who wields a vajra.
Ramayan
:
Indra used his vajra on Lord Hanuman when he tried to eat Suryadev
during his childhood. However, he was unaffected by it.
Vitra
:
Vritra
is a Vedic serpent, dragon or demon in Hinduism, the personification
of drought and adversary of Indra. Vritra is identified as an Asur.
Vritra was also known in the Veds as Ahi (Sanskrit: ahi, lit. "snake").
He appears as a dragon blocking the course of the rivers and is
heroically slain by Indra.
Vedic
version :
According
to the Rig Ved, Vritra kept the waters of the world captive until
he was killed by Indra, who destroyed all the 99 fortresses of Vritra
(although the fortresses are sometimes attributed to Sambar) before
liberating the imprisoned rivers. The combat began soon after Indra
was born, and he had drunk a large volume of Som at Tvashtri's house
to empower him before facing Vritra. Tvashtri fashioned the thunderbolt
(Vajrayudh) for Indra, and Vishnu, when asked to do so by Indra,
made space for the battle by taking the three great strides for
which Vishnu became famous.
Vritra
broke Indra's two jaws during the battle, but was then thrown down
by Indra and, in falling, crushed the fortresses that had already
been shattered. For this feat, Indra became known as "Vrtrahan"
(lit. "Slayer of Vritra" and also as "slayer of the
first-born of dragons"). Vritra's mother, Danu, who was also
the mother of the Danav race of Asurs, was then attacked and defeated
by Indra with his thunderbolt. In one of the versions of the story,
three Devtas – Varun, Som and Agni – were coaxed by
Indra into aiding him in the fight against Vritra, whereas before
they had been on the side of Vritra (whom they called "Father").
Puranic
and later versions :
As told in the narration given to King Yudhishthir in the Mahabharat,
Vritra was a demon created by artisan god Tvashta to avenge the
killing of his son by Indra, known as Trisiras or Visvarup. Vritra
won the battle and swallowed Indra, but the other gods forced him
to vomit Indra out. The battle continued and Indra was eventually
forced to flee. Vishnu and the rishis (sages) brokered a truce,
with Indra swearing that he would not attack Vritra with anything
made of metal, wood or stone, nor anything that was dry or wet,
or during the day or the night. Indra used the foam (which Vishnu
had entered to ensure victory) from the waves of the ocean to kill
him at twilight.
Srimad
Bhagavatam recognizes Vritra as a bhakta (devotee) of Vishnu who
was slain only due to his failure to live piously and without aggression.
This story runs thus :
(Srimad
Bhagavatam = SB) :
SB
6.9.11 : After Visvarup was killed,
his father, Tvashta, performed ritualistic ceremonies to kill Indra.
He offered oblations in the sacrificial fire, saying, "O enemy
of Indra, flourish to kill your enemy without delay."
SB
6.9.12 : Thereafter, from the southern
side of the sacrificial fire known as Anvaharya came a fearful personality
who looked like the destroyer of the entire creation at the end
of the millennium.
SB
6.9.13 - 17 : Like arrows released
in the four directions, the demon's body grew, day after day. Tall
and blackish, he appeared like a burnt hill and was as lustrous
as a bright array of clouds in the evening. The hair on the demon's
body and his beard and moustache were the colour of melted copper,
and his eyes were piercing like the midday sun. He appeared unconquerable
as if holding the three worlds on the points of his blazing trident.
Dancing and shouting with a loud voice, he made the entire surface
of the earth tremble as if from an earthquake. As he yawned, again
and again, he seemed to be trying to swallow the whole sky with
his mouth, which was as deep as a cave. He seemed to be licking
up all the stars in the sky with his tongue and eating the entire
universe with his long, sharp teeth. Seeing this gigantic demon,
everyone, in great fear, ran here and there in all directions.
SB
6.9.18 : That very fearful demon, who was actually
the son of Tvashta, covered all the planetary systems by dint of
austerity. Therefore, he was named Vritra, or one who covers everything.
Vritra
became the head of the Asurs (portrayed as inherently demonic here,
as opposed to the Vedic version in which they can be gods or demons).
He renounced his dharma – duty – to do good unto others
and turned to violence, battling with the Devtas. Eventually, he
gained the upper hand and the Devtas were frightened of his evil
might. Led by Indra, they approached Lord Vishnu for help. He told
them that Vritra could not be destroyed by ordinary means, revealing
that only a weapon made from the bones of a sage could slay him.
When the deities revealed their doubts about the likelihood of any
ascetic donating his body, Vishnu directed them to approach the
rishi Dadhichi. When approached by the gods, Dadhichi gladly gave
up his bones for the cause of the good, stating that it would be
better for his bones to help them attain victory than to rot in
the ground. The Devtas collected the bones and Indra crafted the
Vajrayudha from them. When they engaged Vritra again, the battle
lasted for 360 days before Vritra breathed his last.
As
per the Puranic (Mahabharat) references, the terrible anthropomorphic
personification of Brahmanahatya (Brahmanicide) chased Indra and
forced him into hiding for his sin and Nahusha was invited to take
his place.
Hymn
18 of Mandala IV provides the most elaborate account of the Vedic
version. The verses describe the events and circumstances leading
up to the battle between Indra and Vritra, the battle itself, and
the outcome of the battle.
Note
: Here we find Vedic version of Vitra to be more reliable
than Puranic and SB version.
Indra and Vitra as per Sumerian, Babylonian, Phoenician, Egyptian,
Indian, and Hebrew Versions :
According
to Lieutenant Colonel Laurence Austine Waddell :
From
the Book The British Edda 1930 Part 3 :
SCENE
XXVIII
Capture and Slaying of the Dragon Priestess of Eden by Adam-George
in Sumerian, Babylonian, Phoenician, Egyptian, Indian, and Hebrew
Versions, and the hero as Adam or St George of Cappadocia.
Sumerian & Babylonian Versions
The Sumerian and Babylonian hymns and litanies are full of this
epoch-making event and gratitude for it. Thus a Sumerian hymn refers
to it :
"Thou Adar who destroyed the life of The Evil One, may thy
heart be exalted."
And the scene of Adar or In-dara slaying the Dragon is frequently
represented on Sumerian, Babylonian and Hittite sacred seals (see,
e.g., Figs. 117 f.). Later this achievement was credited by the
Babylonians to Adar or Bel's son Mar-Duk, i.e., Cain, as "The
Son-Duke" or Archangel, who slew the young Dragon Aplu or Abel,
who is significantly called "the young Hydra" in the Central
Edda lay.
In these later Babylonian accounts of the polytheistic period, when
the idea of a God, first imagined by Adam, had become adopted by
the Chaldees and extended by them to include their deified Mother-Son,
EI-Abe1-Wodan and other personages deified by their priests, this
old Mother-priestess as the Dragon is now considered a separate
she-devil from their ancient El, and is generally called Tiawath,
as we have seen, also "Mother Hubur" (Hubbard), and described
as the "Plague, the Fearful Dragon, the Dragon which shines
brightly, the female spirit who devours with a Serpent's mouth."
Bel Mar-Duk as the champion of Heaven receives instructions from
"the council of gods in Heaven" :
"Go thou and cut off Tiawath's life-breath !"
Significantly in the Assyrian version he is armed with "the
invincible club," spear, dagger and "the net," and
"the plant which annihilates poison," which we have seen
was the Rowan Apple-tree. The leading incidents in the fight and
slaying of the Dragon according to the Assyrio-Babylonian tradition
are indicated in the following extracts from the long original texts
translated by Professor Sayee :
"He (Mar-Duk) made a snare to enclose the Dragon of the sea
. . . .
His hand brought the snare near unto the bow of his father Anu .
. . .
Then Bel opened his snare and enclosed her . . . .
He swung the club, he shattered her . . . .
He mastered her heart, he bound her and ended her life,
He threw down her corpse, he stood on it."
All this, it will be seen, is in essential agreement with the earlier
authentic tradition preserved in the Eddas, and "the standing
on" the corpse compares with the Eddic "stept over."
And it discloses that the legend of the Slaying of the Dragon by
Adar-George did not arise as a priestly myth of the Sun vanquishing
the Demon of Darkness, and Rain and Mist, as hitherto supposed,
but was founded on the actual historical human achievement of Adam-George
in his vanquishing the Serpent-Dragon priestess in his civilizing
war against Eden.
Phoenician Version
The later Phcenicians represented Adam-George as mounted on horseback
and spearing the Dragon (see Fig. 119); and it was they presumably
who brought to their colony in Britain the mounted version of that
legend.
Egyptian Version
In the Egyptian version the Great Serpent of Evil and arch-enemy
of Ra the Sun-god, and slain by the latter (i.e., Roa or Rab, title
of Thor in Edda, and the Ravas of the Vedas), is usually called
Apap, and supposed to be a male, though the eat's head sometimes
given it would rather imply feminine gender. Its titles, moreover,
of Hem-Hem, Serem-tau and Bed-eshu seem to equate with the Eddic
titles of El as Hymi, Hrym and Gram - the Sarama of the Vedas and
Bud of the above Eddic lays.
The Egyptian accounts of the slaying of this Serpent by Ra agree
generally with the Edda. Ra captured the Serpent by fetters, and
"Ra pierceth thy head, he slitteth up thy face, he divided
thy head, and it is crushed in thy land, thy bones are smashed to
pieces."
And the chapter in the book on its overthrow is entitled "Defiling
Apap with the left foot," in keeping with the Eddic statement
that her corpse was" stepped over."
Striking confirmation of the Eddic accounts are found in the scenes
pictured on the beautiful alabaster sarco-phagus of Seti I, the
father of Rameses the Great, about 1370 B.C., now in the Soane Museum
in London. Several of the details of the scenes of the capture of
this Serpent on this ancient Egyptian monument, namely the mighty
hand, etc., now receive their long forgotten explanation by means
of our British Edda (see Figs. 125 and 129). According to the Egyptian
legend after the hooking of the Serpent "twelve strong-armed
gods" were unable to hold the chain, and the Serpent was escaping,
when "there arose a 'Hidden Hand,' which grasped the chain
and prevented it moving." That hand is now seen to be Cain's.
Indian Versions
The Vedas are full of references to Indra (i.e., In-Dara or Andara)
slaying the great Serpent demon therein styled Ahi, Ahi Budhnya
(the Bud of the Edda) or Vritra, "the Brute." It is represented
in the Vedas as a male whom Indra kills by striking with his bolt,
and he shatters its fortresses.
The Indian Epics, preserving her original female character, represent
Bur of Vindi, as Prithu Vainya, as justifying the slaying of the
Earth-Mother who had caused untold misery to the early world, in
the following words :
"When the happiness of many is secured by the destruction of
one malignant being, the death of that being is an act of virtue."
Buddha also in the collection of old-world legends, with which he
illustrated his sermons, retails the form of the legend with death
of this sanguinary sacrificing matriarch which was current in India
in his day in the fifth century B.C. Her name Kali well equates
with the Eddic Kiol, Gal and Goll, and with the Sumerian Gul or
Gula. He says rather gruesomely :
"See Kali trussed for burial, loathsome sight!
Clumsy and huge she lies, the crow-black troll.
Broken her limbs, and from her broken skull
The clotted brain like curd oozing white.
Such, such is mortal Woman !"
Hebrew
Versions
The Serpent we are told in the Hebrew Genesis was already in the
Garden of Eden before "The Fall of Man," (and thus presumably
at home there), and could speak, and that it "was more subtil
than any beast of the field," and that it was told that "the
seed of the woman (Eve) shall bruise thy head." This latter
"prophecy" presumably referred to the later legend of
the Gentile Cain's hooking of the Serpent or Serpent-priestess El.
The slaying of the Serpent by Adam is referred to several times
in the Hebrew Old Testament under Adam's title of Ia or Jah, i.e.,
the Sumerian Ia synonym reading of Adam's In-Duru or In-Dara title-under
which he was latterly deified, and which Aryan title was bodily
borrowed by the Hebrews as the later title of their tribal god.
Thus, in Psalm lxxiv. 13 :
" Thou (Jah) brakest the heads of the Dragons in the water,
Thou brakest the heads of the Leviathan in pieces."
And Job says, xxvi, 13 (Revised Version) and xli. I :
"His hand hath pierced the fleeing Serpent . . . .
Canst thou draw out the Leviathan with a. hook,
Or his tongue with a cord which thou lettest down ?
Canst thou put a hook in his nose ?"
Adam-George
of Cappadocia & Eden as the Historical Human Original of St
George & the Dragon & the Patron Saint of England
This
victory over and slaying of the Dragon matriarch priestess of the
sanguinary bestial cult of Eden by Adam-George of Cappadocia is
now disclosed as the human historical origin of the legend of St
George and the Dragon. And it receives historical, inscriptional
and relatively contemporary proof by the votive record engraved
on the captured magic stone-bowl of Carchemish or Eden, by King
Udug, the great-grandson of Adam-Thor, to whose memory it was dedicated
at the foundation of the great central Sun-Temple at Nippur in Mesopotamia,
as we have seen under "The Holy Grail" episode. This dedication
attests the immense historical importance which King Adam's early
descendants placed upon his victory over Eden.
The conspicuous use of the Red Cross in this engagement is also
significant and confirmatory of his identity with St George, whose
name he actually bears in some of the verses. And the numerous early
Sumerian, Babylonian and Hittite seals representing this event,
pictured the Cross in the form of a St George's Cross, and only
very rarely as a St Andrew's Cross, which latter originally was
the St George's Cross tilted over, as carried in action.
The great patron saint of England is thus disclosed to be none other
than Adam, the much maligned by Hebrews and through them by modern
Christians, in ignorance of his identity with the great Gentile
Gothic King Adam-George of Cappadocia, the Patron Saint of England,
Andrew of the Scots, and Prometheus, greatest of world-kings, who
raised the fallen men of the old pre-Adamite world to the Higher
Civilization.
Moreover, we also now find that Adam-Thor, under his Sumerian title
of Zagg or Zakh, the Sig of the Edda, is the historical original
of "Jack the Giant-Killer" of our nursery tale, which
is seen to be an infantile version of one of the greatest historical
events in the life of our ancestral Early Aryans in establishing
for us the Higher Civilization.
SCENE XXIX
Adam, Her-Thor or Ar-Thur's Enthronement as Victor in Eden, in Sumerian,
Hittite and Cadmon's British Versions, and on the ROM title for
Eden and its Edenites.
Sumerian Version of King Dar's (or Adam-Thor's) Enthronement in
Eden
In the Sumerian psalms are references to King Dar's or Adam-Thor's
enthronement "on the throne of the shrine supreme," which
is obviously in Eden after his victory there, as well as numerous
representations of the event on the sacred Sumerian seals picturing
his enthronement on the Lion Throne (see Figs. 134 f.).
Thus it is referred to in some psalms :
"On the throne of the shrine supreme, even on his (Dar's) seat,
Is a brilliant light when he lights it up.
At the festival they establish him joyfully on his seat . . . .
O Lord, a station on high (is thy habitation) . . . .
Dar, the warrior of the mountain who subjugatest.
Who carried away the land of the disobedient, may thy
heart be exalted !"
It
appears to be from this enthronement at the head-centre of the Lion-tribe
at Eden that Adam Dar Dan came to be represented as seated on a
Lion-throne with his foot upon a lion.
Hittite Version of his Enthronement at Eden
The Hittite version of King Adam-Thor's enthronement in Eden is
well seen not only in the Hittite sacred seals, but also in the
magnificent Hittite sculpture of him enthroned on the Lion-throne
(see Plate XXVII), which was actually found at Carchemish or Eden.
Ancient British Version of Adam's Victory over Satan (Sutt)
in Eden & his Enthronement there
Adam's victory over the historical human Satan in Eden and the "cherubims
with flaming swords" and his assumption of sovereignty there
as enthroned King of Eden, was clearly known to the British poet
Caedmon or Cadmon, and presumably so through the Eddas; as his metre
is in the ordinary Eddic measure and the most of his words are later
dialectic forms of the Eddic, and his name "Metod" for
God as the Creator, is suggestive of the Miot Od title of Adam-Thor,
who was latterly deified by the Aryans. In his poem on Genesis,
Caedmon, even on being Christianized, cannot divest himself of the
old true tradition of his Briton ancestors regarding Adam, and makes
Satan (i.e., Sut or Seth) on being dispossessed lament, saying :
" That is my greatest sorrow,
That Adam, wrought of earth,
Should hold my firm-set throne
And live in friendly joy, while we
Endure this bitter woe in hell."
ROM
or "Rome" title for Eden and its Wolf-tribe votaries of
the Mother-Son Cult
In
Sumerian, the abode of the oracular priestess, from about 3100 B.C.
onwards. is called Edin or Etin (WSAD. 69, WISD. 33 f.), the latter
form being in series with the Eddic Iaetun name for "Eden."
And significantly this Sumerian word-sign was also given the synonym
word-form of Rum (Br. 4524 and 3; Prince S.L., 277), which is in
agreement with the Rom title in this Eddic lay.
Rom of the Edda is thus seen to have been a synonym for Eden and
its Wolf-tribe priestess and Chaldee people.
This now appears to explain the legend that the mythical founders
of the new Rome in Italy, Romulus and Remus, were "wolf-suckled."
suggesting that they were of the Mother-cult of the Wolf-tribe of
the Roms; and the Italian physical type is the same non-Aryan type
as that of the aboriginal dark Chaldeans, Lycians, etc., the so-called
Mediterranean or Iberian race. Moreover, Rom or Romit was the title
of the Set-Wolf and Serpent worshipping aborigines of Ancient Egypt
(MDC. 43); and "Romany" is the title of the dark non-Aryan
fortunetelling gipsies and weirds of Roumania and elsewhere of the
"Mediterranean" or "Iberian" race; and the present-day
Moslem title of "Rum" for Asia Minor and for their religious
capital at Constantinople was not borrowed from the Italian "Rome"
as is generally supposed.
It thus appears that the original head-centre seat of the Mother-Son-cult,
with its shaven and befrocked matriarchist priests and priestesses,
inveterately antagonistic to the monotheistic idea of God and to
the advance of the Higher Knowledge and Civilization, was from pre-historic
time immemorial called "Rom" or "Rome," and
the home of "Mother Mary."
SCENE XXX
Regeneration of Eden and Uplifting of Man by Adam in Sumerian and
Babylonian Versions
Sumerian & Babylonian Versions of the Regeneration of Eden by
King Dar or Adam
There are frequent references in the Sumerian hymns to King Dar
or Adam's "scattering the seed" of his Higher Civilization
and exalting of man, and his clemency towards his quondam enemies.
Thus, for example, in the same hymn which celebrates his capture
of the Stone Bowl of Eden, Dar, now semi-deified, is acclaimed as
:
Dar, exalter of man, who makes joyful his side,
The Lord who (grants) pardon to his (conquered) city,
Has driven his chariot over the mountain, has scattered wide the
seed.
(Men) altogether have proclaimed his name daily for sovereignty
over them.
(Thou wert) the warrior of the mountain who subjugated.
This annexation and transformation of Eden, Urdu or Ur into a real
paradise by Adam In-Dara and his son Cain (the Son-Duke, Mar-Duk),
now explains how Urdu or "Eridu" came in the later Sumerian
and Babylonian hymns to be called a "home" of these two
deified Gothic heroes; and in secular literature was "The Land
of the Amorites," a people whom I have shown in previous works
to have been a branch of the Hittites and of Gothic race.
Indeed King Adam Dar's magnanimous forgiveness of the Abelites,
Balderites or Tamuzites, with permission to return to the reformed
Eden when they themselves had become law-abiding and somewhat reformed,
with a reformed new generation of Mother-Son leaders, to dwell amongst
Adam's civilized "Sons of God," seems to be reflected
even in the later hymns of the Chaldees themselves, though they
suppress therein all reference to Adam's name. Thus these later
Chaldee hymns sing :
"Innini
[The Second ?] to her women cried :
In Heaven there is Light! On Earth there is Light!
Magnified is he, magnified is the Lord ! . . . .
In Urdu (Urd or Eden) its brick walls reposed,
Upon Urdu a faithful eye he cast.
There the Valiant in his boat descended . . . .
Where grass was not, there grass (grain) is eaten,
Where water was not, water is drunk,
Where the cattle sheds were not, cattle sheds are built . . . .
The spade labours not, and the granaries shall be heaped."