NAG
/ NAGA
Nag
/ Naga is gotra of Jats found in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar
Pradesh,Haryana and Punjab. Dilip Singh Ahlawat has mentioned it
as one of the ruling Jat clans in Central Asia.
Origin
:
It was a group of various vanshas who had symbol of serpent on their
flags. They were called Nagavanshi.
History
of Nagas :
Ram Swarup Joon writes that Naga gotra is a branch of Bharshiv Nag
gotra.
Dr.
Kashi Prasad Jaiswal writes at Page 29 of his book entitled 'India
of the Dark Ages' that the Nags had three capitals ie Mathura, Kashipur
and Padmavati after first century AD. The King of Padmavati was
known by the name of Nag. The eldest of his dynasty was King Gajvarkar.
Nagas
were a group of Mongoloid people, who had spread throughout India
by the advent of the period of the epics Mahabharat and Ramayan.
The demi-god tribe called Suparnas (to which Garud belonged) were
arch-rivals of the Nagas. However, the Nagas near Kashmir seem to
be the original abode of all of them. Places like Anantnag attest
this theory.
Nag
Anant was the first among all the Naga kings.
The second Naga chief Vasuki had the kingdom near Kailas (hence
the connection of Vasuki with lord Shiv).
The third chief Takshak, in Takshasila both not far from Anantnag.
The kingdoms of other Nagas like Karkotak and Airavat (near river
Iravati (Ravi, one among the five rivers of Punjab) were also not
far away.
Nagas had kingdoms in Nagaland and Andhra Pradesh . Arjun's wife
Ulupi was from one of such Naga kingdom (in Gangetic Plain) Arjun's
another wife Chitrangada who was also known to Ulupi was from Manipuri
(location uncertain). She was probably from a Dravidian tribe. There
are now many Naga worshiping places in South India, especially in
Andhra Pradesh and Kerala.
Naga
race was almost exterminated by Janamejay, the Kuru king in Arjun's
line, which conducted the massacre of Nagas at Takshasila. This
massacre was stopped by Astik, a Brahmin whose mother was a Naga
(Vasuki's sister Jaratkaru).
According
to a story in Matsya Puran, quoted in chapter X of a book India
of the Dark Ages the Nagas ruled for 100 years as renegades (this
because they were Buddhist). Later, it is said they purified themselves
with water of the Ganga, performed ten Asvamedh Yagyas and were
thus accepted, into the folds of Vaishnavism.
In
Mahavansh :
Mahavahs , provides a continuous historical record of over two millennia,
and is considered one of the world's longest unbroken historical
accounts. [8] It is one of the few documents involving material
relating to the Naga and Yakkh peoples, indigenous residents of
Lanka prior to the legendary arrival of Prince Vijaya from Singh
Pur.
Mahavansh
/ Chapter 1 writes about the Visit of Buddh to Nagadip. Now the
most compassionate teacher, the Conqueror, rejoicing in the salvation
of the whole world, when dwelling at Jetavana in the fifth year
of his Buddhahood, saw that a war, caused by a gem-set throne, was
like to come to pass between the nagas Mahodara and Cülodara,
uncle and nephew, and their followers; and he, the Sambuddha , on
the uposathaday of the dark half of the month Citta, in the early
morning, took his sacred alms-bowl and his robes, and, from compassion
for the nagas, sought the Nagadip.
That
same naga Mahodar was then a king, gifted with miraculous power,
in a naga-kingdom in the ocean, that covered half a thousand yojans.
His younger sister had been given (in marriage) to the naga-king
on the Kannavaddhamana mountain ; her son was Culodara . His mother's
father had given to his mother a splendid throne of jewels, then
the naga had died and therefore this war of nephew with uncle was
threatening; and also the nagas of the mountains were armed with
miraculous power.
The
dev named Samiddhisuman took a rajayatan-tree standing in Jetavan,
his own fair habitation and holding it like a parasol over the Conqueror,
he with the Teacher's leave attended him to that spot where he had
formerly dwelt. That very deva had been, in his latest birth, a
man in Nagadipa . On the spot where thereafter the rajyatan-tree
stood, he saw paceekabuddhas taking their meal. And at the sight
his heart was glad and he offered branches to cleanse the alms bowl.
Therefore he was reborn in that tree in the pleasant Jetvan-garden,
and it (the tree) stood afterwards outside at the side of the gate-rampart.
The God of all gods saw (in this) an advantage for that deva, and,
for the translates of the good which should spring (therefrom) for
our land, he brought him hither (to Lafik) together with his tree.
Hovering
there in mid-air above the battlefield the Master, who drives away
(spiritual) darkness, called forth dread darkness over the nagas.
Then comforting those who were distressed by terror he once again
spread light abroad. When they saw the Blessed One they joyfully
did reverence to the Master's feet. Then preadied the Vanquisher
to them the doctrine that begets concord and both nagas gladly gave
up the throne to the Sage. ' When the Master, having alighted on
the earth, had taken his place on a seat there, and had been refreshed
with celestial food and drink by the naga-kings, he the Lord, established
in the (three) refuges and in the moral precepts eighty kotis of
snake-spirits, dwellers in the ocean and on the mainland.
The
naga -king Maniakkhik of Kalyani mother's brother to the naga Mahodar
who had come thither to take part in the battle, and who, aforetime,
at the Buddha 's first coming, having heard the true doctrine preached,
had become established in the refuges and in the moral duties, prayed
now to the Tathagata: `Great is the compassion that thou hast shown
us here, O Master! Hadst thou not appeared we had all been consumed
to ashes. May thy compassion yet light also especially on me, O
thou who art rich in loving-kindness, in that thou shalt come yet
again hither to my dwelling-country, O thou peerless one. ' When
the Lord had consented by his silence to come thither, he planted
the rajayatana-tree on that very spot as a sacred memorial, and
the Lord of the Worlds gave over the rajayatana-tree and the precious
throne-seat to the naga-kings to do homage thereto. `In remembrance
that I have used these do homage to them, ye naga-kings!
This,
well beloved, will bring to pass blessing and happiness for you.
' When the Blessed One had uttered this and other exhortation to
the nägas, he, the compassionate savior of all the world, returned
to Jetvan.
In
Rajtarangini :
Rajtarangini tells us ... At the time of Murder of the king Sussala
in 1127 AD, when the rebels went out of the house, they killed the
mighty Nagak, a servant of the king, who with drawn sword was entering
the door. [VIII (i), p.113]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... In 1127 AD King of Kashmir Sussal was murdered and
Sussal's head brought to Bhikshu. Bhikshu lost his sense of right
and wrong, on account of his inhumanity. He sent the head of the
late king to Rajapuri. Nagpal who lived in friendship with his brother
could not brook the insult offered to the bead of his benefactor;
and farsighted men apprehended defeat from the Kashmirians and advised
Nagpal to perform the last rites to his master's head. [[VIII (i),
p.125-126] (Nagapal Naga).
Rajtarangini
tells us ... Somapal, driven by his son named Bhupal and grieved
at the faction which prevailed for a long time in his own kingdom,
went to the king of Kashmir and sought his protection. The king
who loved those who asked for his shelter, promised safety to Somapala
and also to Nagpal who had given away his wealth to his two sons.
The king, whose character was ennobled by real magnanimity, did
not at this time of danger resent the crafty conduct of Somapal
who was the cause of calamity to a great kingdom. But in order to
help Nagpal, the king gave him his own army, crushed the pride of
his enemies and re-established the stability of the kingdom. (p.197)
Rajtarangini
tells .... Rajvadan was born of Ojas, a leader in the army and in
the womb of a chaste woman. This Ojas beamed with prowess, and during
the civil war, adorned Sussala 's army which was, as it were, a
test stone of heroism for the principal warriors. Rajvadana was,
during his childhood, called the long-blanket-clad. Owing to the
faithfulness of his father, he was retained by the king in his service,
and the possession of the estates of Ebenaka & c. was gradually
given to him. But Naga , born in the hermitage of Khuya, turned
the king against Rajavadana, whereupon the latter, with a view to
fight, held him in subjection. All feared that being a servant,
he would not act cruelly towards the king, and not being a Lavanya,
would not stand against the sovereign. [VIII (ii), p.245]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... the great Naga attained such fame that his own countrymen
did not feel ashamed to serve him. He was adorned with the virtues
of charity, forgiveness, activity and want of avarice, and he shone
as one who always enjoyed riches, and he was accessible to men.
[VIII (ii), p.247]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... The king in order to bring his enemies to his side,
asked Naga with an assumed composure, to leave Rajavadan and to
come under his protection. Naga, who was like a milch cow addressed
[the soldiers] saying, - "Here is Rajvadan, the son of Tejas,
a leader in the army, riding in the carriage in your presence. Why
do you wait for him, as a sentinal waits, for his time?" [VIII
(ii), p.261]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... In the civil war during which two sovereigns were removed
and which is now carried on by the remaining one, the king became
confounded, as in chess play. The Valahar intended to win over Naga,
but had neither infantry nor cavalry to execute his purpose; he
nevertheless persisted in his aim without such assistance. He deceived
his enemies by craft. The villains (party of the Valahar) were addicted
to dice, and were waiting for the end of the winter season. The
Valahara consequently apprehended the destruction of his own men
by Naga who was strong and remained unslackened in his enmity and
had commenced to commit unfriendly acts. Nagaand Dhanya ran (after
the Valahar) who trembled with fear. He then consulted Bhoj and
sent a message to Dhanya to the following effect: - "Bring
Naga bound to me, and I will give up Bhoj." [VIII (ii), p.272]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... Since the time of Bhikshu, Naga was always rebelling,
and on account of his hostility, the king was waging war, for self
interest, and had become indifferent towards him. The king arrested
Naga without taking any pledge for receiving Bhoj. Sensible men
became for this reason angry with him. This action of the king was
ultimately productive of good results, but such results were not
foreseen by him, and could not be foreseen except by superhuman
intelligence. Bhoj, as if estranged [from the Valhar] sent information
to Naga that "the Valaharaintends to give me up to the king
after taking from the king a pledge for his surrendering you to
the Valahar. " Bhoj did not believe that he would be seized,
but said this to Naga in the hope that Naga, out of fear of the
king, might remain neutral. [VIII (ii), p.273]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... when Shashthachandra died, the king caused Naga to
be brought to him, by means of Jayachandra whom he had won over
to his side. Fearing that Jayachandra whom the king had brought
over to his side would kill him, the minister Naga was preparing
to depart, but Bhoja caused him to be obstructed. Even after knowing
that he had been drawn there by these two men, Naga lost his self
control, and sent a message, through messengers, to Bhoj. When a
man sinks in the womb of the stream of fate, his cars can not hear
the voice of one warning him, from the banks, of his condition.
When
Naga was arrested, his terrified relatives came and took protection
of the crafty Valahar who could with difficulty be seen. Dhanya
took with him Naga who was the price for buying Bhoj, ran together
with Rilhan, and went to the Valahar. The Valahar who was deceiving
them, laughed internally and misled them saying: - "Give up
Naga to me first, and I will give up Bhoj to you." [VIII (ii),
p.274]
Rajtarangini
tells us ... Murder of Naga and the rise of the Damaras : Loshtak,
son of Naga's brother, was a determined man and had obtained property
when Naga was afar; and was secretly [Naga's] enemy. He caused Naga
to be killed by Dhanya and others. When Naga was destroyed by the
ministers blinded by causeless enmity, [the king's] own men and
others blamed the ill advised act. The Damaras, followers of Naga,
became angry at the murder of their own tribes-men, and set themselves
up against [the king) and took refuge of the powerful Valahar. When
a man gets confused at the approach of danger, and wanders from
his object, and does evil deeds, Fate determines his work. Auspicious
Fate puts an end to the miseries of the man who, having obtained
money, finds it difficult to enjoy it, who first allows his mind
to travel in evil ways, loses self control and then turns about
hastily into a hollow, and who shows on his person the marks produced
by the stroke of the scabbard of other wen. Bhoj did not know the
fate of Naga, after whom none enquired, and who was thus murdered,
by the wise ministers. [VIII (ii), p.275]
Rajtarangini
tells .... In order to prevent the destruction of the Damaras, Bhoj
sent letters with a small detachment of foreigners under Naga and
a body of Rajputs. Neither by his own cunning followers nor by tumults
could the patient Bhoj be moved from his cool determination and
fixed purpose. [VIII (ii), p.291]
Khandv Van :
President Vijender Kumar Mathur has articles that .... Khandvprsth
Pandavs at the Indraprasth fire has since become the new capital
called Krishna and Arjun helps Khandv Van had been consumed. It
was inhabited by some non-Aryan castes such as snakes and demons
who could present fear for the new capital of the Pandavs. Takshaknag
lived in this forest and here was the residence of a great mechanic
named Mayadanav who later became a friend of the Pandavs and who
was Yudhishthir in Indraprasth Made a wonderful assembly building.
The episode of Khandv Van-Dah is described in detail in Mahabharat
etc. festivals 221 to 226. It is said that Maydanav's house was
near present-day Meerut (Myarashtra) and Khandv Van's extension
was about 45 miles from Meerut to Delhi. There is a very thrilling
description of the burning Khandv Van in the Mahabharat. (Adi Parv
224,35-36-37). During the burning of Khandv Van, Indra made a fierce
rain to protect him, but Arjun and Krishna failed him with the help
of their weapons.
History
of Nagvansh :
Thakur Deshraj has written .... Naga- He ruled in Nagahad and Nagaur.
They left both these places in the seventh century.
Nagavanshj
Jats - In Central Asia, there was a Neurian race with the Shakavansh
Jats, which was attacked by the Nag Jats.
Dalip
Singh Ahlawat has described the history of Nagavansh in this way
:
Nagavansh
is a well-known dynasty which is a group of descendants of many
Kshatriya Aryans just like Suryavansh and Chandravansh. Historians
are of the opinion that these Kshatriyas are part of their 'Nag'
flag.
The
reason became famous under the name Nag. It was a cultured lineage
of the Yakshs, Gandharvs and the gods. Different views regarding
the origin of this Nagvansh are as follows -
Elarav
had two sons, Caiyan and Nagas, in the ninth generation of the age
(Chandravanshi Samrat). It is from this Nagas that the origin of
the Nagavansh appears (Vedic wealth p. 426, author S. Raghunandan
Sharma Sahityabhushan).
Sursa and Kadru, the daughters of Prajapati Daksh, produced sons
of Naga and Pannag caste. Dakshaputri Vinat has only two famous
sons - 1. Garud 2. Arun. Daksh's daughter Vinat and Kadru Suryavanshi
were the wives of Kashyap. (Mahabharat Adi Parv, Chapter 66, Verse
69-70).
There was a 'Nag' caste of humans. They live in an era Indus
to hell (where the Sindhu river falls into the sea) and the second
Abyss America etc. Pandav Bhim was protected by the Nagas. Janamejay
fought against the Nagas. Daksh had a sursa among his daughters.
His son was Nag. Central Asia in trucks a Nurian (with Neurian
lived race). He was once attacked by the Nagas. In this subject,
Herodotus writes that Darius - Darius) A generation before the invasion
of the Nagas invaded the Neurian race. According to Nandlal De historian,
many Hunas have been named after the names of the serpents. (First
Chronicles of India, Vol. 244-245, author Pt. Bhagavadatt B.A.).
This Naga dynasty had originated in the beginning of the beginning,
ie the Vedic period. These people are of both Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi
dynasty. He was inhabited and in the Vedic period in the United
States. The articles of Mahabharata Udyog Parva in this subject
are as follows -
Matali Maharaj was Indra's friend, charioteer, friend minister.
She had a beautiful girl named Gunakeshi. Matli went to Patal Lok
(America) with Narad in search of a groom for his daughter. Narad
ji says that Matale! This is Nagalok. Here Nagraj is born in the
lineage of the superior Gaja Supratiq named Airavat, Vamana, Kumud
and Anjan (M.P. Chapter 99, Verse 15).
Narad
ji further says that Matale! It is a Puri named His Bhogavati secured
by Nagraj Vasuki of Nagalok. Like Amaravati, the best city of Devraj
Indra, it is also blessed with happiness and prosperity. Sars's
son Naggan resides in Naglok devoid of grief. Many snakes are
the descendants of Kashyap (M.S. Chapter 103, verses 1–4).
Narad
Uvach - Matale! It is Nagraj Sumukh, which originated in the clan
of Airavat. It is the grandson of Aryak and the grandson of Vaman.
His father was Nagaraja Chikur who was killed a few days ago by
Garud. (M.P. Chapter 103, verses 23–25).
On
Matali's suggestion, Aryak sent his grandson Sumukh with Narad and
Matali to Indra.
History
of Jat Veers : Dalip Singh Ahlawat, pg-239
There
was also Lord Vishnu. Sumukh was married to Gunkeshi there. Vishnu
and Indra bid him farewell. Sumukh marries and goes to her home
at will. (M.P. Chapter 103, Verse 22, 23-29).
This
Nagavansh had great fame even during the Ramayan period. Organization
of this huge Nagavansham in this period was by several small famous
Jat dynasties which Vasati or VAS, Takshak, black (Kalidhamn), Punia
(Punia), Awlk, Murmur, Barshiv (Braic are etc). These Jatvans are
famous as the branch of Nagavansh. Of these, the description of
the Paunia dynasty has been written on the previous pages of this
third chapter, the description of the remaining lineages will be
written at the appropriate place.
On
the occasion of Ravan's Digvijay, after conquering many countries,
Ravan entered the Jalanidhi sea protected by Rakshash and Nagas
with the desire to go to the abyss, seated with him on the Pushpak
Viman, the demons etc. (V. Uttarakhand, Canto 23rd, Verse 4).
Sa
tu bhogavatiin gatwa purin vasukipalitam.
Kritva Naganashe Hrishtau Yayou Manimayi Purim
(V. Uttarakhand, Canto 23rd, Verse 5)
That is, by entering Nagraj Vasuki Bhogavatipuri, Ravan subjugated
the serpents and from there cheerfully departed Manimayi Puri. 5
Note
- This Manimayipuri is today's Manipur state.
Dr.
Ayodhya scandal, fiftieth canto, verse 14 -
Devadanava
Gandharvai: Kinnaraupashobhitam.
Nagagandharvapatnibhi: Sevitaan Continent Shivam 14
Gods, demons, Gandharvs and eunuchs adorn the Ganges like that of
Shiv. The wives of serpents and Gandharvs always consume its water
14
Kishkindha Canto Iktaliswan Canto - to discover Sita Sugriv sent
south to apes and gave them orders that large-serviced by large
serpents delightful Narmada river, picturesque Godavari, Mahanadi,
Krishnveni and serviced Mahabag Vard of big snakes Seek Sitaji everywhere
on the banks of rivers, etc., and in the snakes of Mekhal (Mekal),
Utkal and Dasharana country and also in Avravanti and Avanipuri.
And
it is written in verse 41, verse 39 -
Sarparajo
Mahapragyo Yasya Vasati Vasuki:
Niraya Margitavya Ch Sa Ch Bhogavati Puri 39
That is, Mahavidwan Sarparaj (Nagraj) Vasuki resides in that Bhogavati
Puri (they can live together in both Bhogavati Puris by taking many
forms with yogic power). Especially you enter that Bhogavati * Puri
and search for Sitaji there 39
It
is different from Bhogwati Puri of Patala (America).
Ramayankal
in Nagavansham major power in India's. According to the legend of
the Purans, Parashuram, who defeated the entire Kshatriyas, had
to make a treaty with these undefeated Nagavanshis and the Brahmins
were ordered to respect the serpents.
Even
in the Mahabharat period, the Nagavans had authority in many places
in India except for Patalalok (America). In the Mahabharat Adiparv
these Nag Kshatriyas are described as having a war with the Pandavs.
On behalf of the Kauravs, the Pandavs got the Khandav forest to
make it the capital, where the famous branch of Nagvansh was the
authority of the king of Takshak caste (Jat). These serpent people
faced Sri Krishna and Arjun with great valor. Arjun set fire around
this forest. When Khandav forest was being burnt, Mahabali Nagraj
went to Takshak Kurukshetra at that time. But his strong son Ashwaseen
remained there who survived the fire. Arjun managed to burn this
forest 1. Takshakraj defeated here and along with his descendants,
made Takshashila the capital and settled there. In the Uttarakhand
101, Canto 101, it is written that "Bharat conquered the Gandharvs
and settled his city Taksh in King Gandhara by making a city called
Taxila."
Due
to this defeat, Nagvanshi Takshas fought towards Pandyas against
Duryodhan. After this, the defenders killed Arjunputr Parikshit
in his palace. The son of Parikshit Janamejaya the Taxila caused
so much harm to Tkshkon attacked, but they could not completely
destroyed. (Mahabharata Adi Parv Chapter 226th)
Based
on the book "Hormsworth History of World", the book "Namveer
Adi Janmabhoomi" Bangla has proved that Nagapuja is still continuing
in many castes in America. From the mythological era, 'Nagpanchami'
became as famous as Ramnavami and Krishna Janmashtami.
The
Pandavs Chandravanshi considered themselves to be bigger than the
Nag people, and used to marry their girls but did not give them
their girls. The proof of this is that three of the eight queens
of Shri Krishna Maharaj belonged to Nagavansh. Yayatiputra was the
Empress of Yadu from Nagavansh. Arjun married Gandharv to Nagin
Ulupi, the daughter of Kauravya of the Nagavansh, and gave him a
powerful son named ' Iravan ' ( Mahabharat Adi Parv, chapter 95).
Astik was the mother of the sage Nagavansh. According to Vayu Purana
99/36, seven kings like Nagavanshj Navnag etc. ruled over Padmavati,
Kantipuri, and Mathura. KushanshaktiNagashakti Shaiva revived religiously
before the rise of the Chistas and Guptas . At this time, these
people started keeping the snake or snake of Shivji wrapped around
their neck. These budding Nagvans established a new tradition of
Shivpuja by holding the Shivling on the shoulder. Hence his name
Bharasiva became famous. An article explaining this name is found
in Balaghat. It is referred to as' Epigraphica
1.
Mahabharata Adiparva, Chapter 226th.
India
'Part 1 page 269 and' Fleet Secret Inscriptions' 245 have done as
follows -
“By
carrying the weight of Shivaling , who had thoroughly satisfied
Shiv, who was crowned with the holy water of the Bhagirathi Ganga,
who had attained his might, and who had bathed the Avatrith by performing
the Das Ashwamedh Yagna, thus the dynasty of those‘ Bharashiv’Maharajas.
Started."
In
Bharat Kalabhavan Kashi, there is also an old human idol, which
has a Shivling on its shoulder. He established Das Ashwamedh Yagya
by setting up his centers all over the country, in whose memory
Dashashwamedh Ghat was built in Kashi. Ashwamedhaji did not destroy
other states according to Vedic practice even after getting the
post of 'Paramvijayee' but took tax (tax) from them.
On
the Indian Antiquary Book 14, p. 45, it is written that the inscription
of the Nagavansh kings at the gate of Shergarh (Kota State), has
been excavated on 15 January 791 A.D., which ruled at that place
the four Naga kings named Vindunag, Padmanam, Sarvanag, Devadatta
Proves to be.
The
kingdom of these Nagavanshi Jats were on Kantipur, Mathura, Padmavati,
Kaushambi, Ahikatpur, Nagpur, Champawati (Bhagalpur), Bundelkhand
and Madhya Pradesh in western Malwa, Nagaur (Jodhpur). In addition
to this, Shergarh was the state of this dynasty in the ancient land
of Kota state, Chutia in Madhya Pradesh, Nagpur, Khairagarh, Chakrakotay
and Kawardh. Mother of Mahavidwan Maharaj Bhoj Parmar (Jat) Sasiprabha
was the daughter of Nagavansh. Rajasthani Mahasant Veevar Teja ji
(Dholya Gotri Jat) died while fighting a Nagvanshi hero named Balu
along with his brave wife Bodal. The tomb of Veer Teja ji remains
there. Even today Rajasthan has more number of Jats of this dynasty.
UP Zi 0 Badaun in Rmpuria, Khudaganj, Dharampur, Bulandshahr the
unhappy village Nagavanshi Jat in. This 'Ahar' is the same ancient
village where Achet Bhimsen was thrown into the Ganges by Duryodhana
feeding poison, which was saved by the Nagavans.
After
reading the above, readers should understand that Nagvanshi snakes
etc. are not animals but actually they are human beings. Nag Jatveer
is that lineage of Aryans who has been well-known in the Kshatriya
history of Bharatvarsha due to his intense venom like anger, sharpness,
might, brilliance, beauty, learning and splendor.
Shakhagotr
the Nagavansham - 1. Vsati or vice 2. Takshak 3. Awlk 4. promontory
5. Black Kalidhamn } Kalknde 6. Sweet 7. Barshiv 8. Braic.
The
Naga Rulers of the North and Central India.
Dr
Naval Viyogi
This content is from Chapter-12 of Dr Naval Viyogi 's Book - "
Nagas: the Ancient Rulers of India ,
p.330-336
Nagas of Vidis :
[p.330]: The Nagas were serpent worshipping non-Aryan civilized
race of ancient India. Many localities and cities were named after
them eg Nagpur, Nagardhan (Nagar-Vardhan), Nagar, Karkotnagar Nagarkhonda,
Nagarkot, Nagarkoil, etc. They flourished in North, East, Central
and South India in ancient time. Evidences The From The Puranas
And Other Sources Show That The Naga Kings Ruled At Takshila, Tnkshr,
Sidargpur, Todak, Nathur, Krcotnagr, Nathur, Indurpur, Fdmwati,
Kantipuri, Vidisa, Purika, Nagpur, Nandi-Vardhan, Eran, Paithan,
etc.
In Mahabharat period these Nagas were ruling in North West with
their capital at Takshila and at Patalpuri around present Karachi
and Hyderabad. From tl1ere they drifted to south and east ie from
the Panjab to Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh in a time which cannot
be ascertained now. The Purans divide the Naga dynasty of Vidisainto
two parts: To the first part belonged those kings who flourished
before the end of the Sungas with their capital at Vidisa (31 BC).
The Kings before this period in the Naga dynasty were Sesh, Bhogin,
Ramchandra, Nakhvan, Dhanavarman or Dharma Varnan and Vangara.
At
this period the Andhra Kings '2' had taken Susarman (The, last Kanva
King) a prisoner and destroyed whatever had been left of the Sunga
power at at time (at Vidisa). This statement of Purans refer to
the Andhra or Satavahan period, when they became emperors of Aryavart
in addition to their being the emperors of Dakshinpath at about
31 BC 3 It means, perhaps due to pressure from Satavahans they shifted
their capital to Padmavati.
Before
proceeding further let us see how the Vayu Purana has called these
Vidisa Nagas, Vrisha or Shiv's bull ie Nandi with which, the names
of the kings coming after the close of the Sunga dynasty, end. It
seems that the title Bharsiva which was taken up later is connected
conceptually with the Vrisha of the Vayu and the Nandi. 4 It means
these Nagas were ethnically 5 related to Bharsivas or Nav Nagas.
Foot
notes :
1.Mahajan
VD, "Ancient India" P-377.
2.
Jayaswal KP . "History of India" P-9.
3.JBORS
I P-1l6.
4.
Jayaswal KP . P-lO.
5.
Jayaswal KP P-18.
[p.331]:
of Panjab see Chapter VI P-144 of later priod. We know Indus Valley
people were also worshipers of God Shiv.
The
second part of these Nagas belonged to those kings who flourished
after the end of the Sungas. The names of these post Sunga Nagas
were Bhuta Nandi or Bhutinandi, Sisunandi and Yasonandi. It appears
that from the time of Bhutanandi, when the dynasty was reestablished,
they made Padmavati their capital. There is a positive confirmation
of the existence of these post Sunga Nagas in the first century
AD at Padmpawaya, which is the site of Padmavati, a statue of Yaksh
Manibhadrawas dedicated by some members of a public body in the
fourth year of the reign of "King Svami Sivanandi". Similarly
a famous Sivalingam called Swarn-Vindu was also established there.
The plat form of the Swarn-Vindu Siva has been discovered by Mr.
Garde at Pavaya . An image of Nandi, with human body and Bull's
head has been found there.
Let us take series of coins which according to Jayaswaal belongs
to this early Nag dynasty. Some of the Coins are generally assigned
to Mathura. In the British Museum there are coins of Seshdat, Ramdat
and Sisuchandra-data. The script of the Seshdat's coinage is the
oldest and belongs to the first century BC . In the same series,
there are coins of Ramdat. These coins, according to the opinion
of Jayaswal, are identical with Sesha-Naga , Ram-chandra and Sisu
Nandi of this dynasty.
As
the Purans generally omit the names when a dynast comes under an
over lordship, Shiv nandi was probably the king superseded by Kanishk.
It is stated in the Purans that Padmavati passe under a ruler named
Vinvasphani, who is to be identified with the viceroy of Kanishk,
Mahakshatrap Vanaspar. 11 It proves that during the period 80–175
AD comes the Kushan rule with the withdrawal of the Naga Kings to
Purik and Nagpur-Nandi-Vardhan in the central provinces.
After
a lot of discussion KP Jayaswal gave the following pedigree and
chronology of the Nagas of Vidisha :
1. Shesh Naga 110-90 BC
2.
Bhogin 90-80 BC
3.
Ramchandra 80-50 BC
4.
Dharma Varman 50-40 BC
5.
Vangar 40-31 BC
Kings
( S.No. 1-5) ruled at Vidisha before the end of the Shungs
At
this time Satavahanas destroyed Shung Kanvas.
6.
Bhut Nandi 20-10 BC
7.
Sisu Nandi 10 BC-25 AD
8.
Yash Nandi 25- ~ 0 AD
Kings
(S.No. 6-8) ruled at Padmavati after the end of Shungs
Foot notes :
6.
Rao SR, "Lothal and the Indus civilization" P-190.
7.
ASR 1915-16 P-106 Plate LXI.
8.
ASR 1915-16 PP-lOO FF.
9.
Jayaswal KP. P-12.
10.
ASR Vol XII P-43.
11.
Jayaswal KP. poll.
12.
Jayaswal KP P-14.
[p.332]
:
9.
Purush dat
10.
Uttam dat
11.
Kam dat
12.
Bhav dat
13.
Shiv Nandi or Shivdat 78 AD. superseded by Kushans
These
five kings (S.No. 9-13) are known from the inscriptions & coins
and their order of succession is also uncertain.
Jayaswal has pointed out that last five kings are known only from
inscriptions and coins. Their order of succession is also uncertain.
All the 13 Naga Kings covered a period of about 200 years from 110
BC to 78 AD. 13
The
Nagas had, under the evident pressure of the Kushanas left Padmavati.
We have the definite statement in the Purans that Vinvasphani ruled
at Padmavati and ruled upto Magadh. Therefore, we may take it that
about 80-100 AD the Nag dynasty takes shelter, away from the trunk
road between Mathura and Vidisa , into the inner jungles of the
central provinces.
The
Bharsivas, re-issuing from the jungles of Hoshangabad and Jabalpur
seem to have reached the Ganges through Baghelkhand. They established
their capital at Kanti or Kantipuri. Now it is a large mud fort
about a mile long on the Ganges. The fort was destroyed in the muslim
period and the king's seat was removed into the neigbouring hills
at Vijaypur and an Manda, where the family, now in two branches:
resides. The local tradition at Kanti is that long before 'the Gahadwala
' the fort belonged originally to the BharKings. The ' Bhar ' kings
here are evidently a corruption of the ' Bharsiva ' kings or Bharshiv.
The
origin of the word ' Bharhut ' or ' Bharhut ' would have been from
'Bhar-Bhukti', which means 'country of Bhars '. 18 Till today-the
people of Bhar tribes reside in this region, who seem to be the
remnants of ' Bhar Naga tribe' to which ruling family belonged.
Jayaswaldoes not agree to this view, but I am its strong supporter:
in view of new archaeological findings and their scientific interpretation,
as glven in previous chapters. However some evidences are produced
below: It is to be noted, that in ancient period, the indigenous
Naga people in particular used to organize themselves into guilds.
(See chapter VI PP 124-25) As the system in origin, was a tribal
evolution, hence guild's people and their elders or chiefs (Khalifah,
or Sresthis) infact were from a single blood. These Khalifah or
Sresthis in later, Mauryan period were known as kings. These kings,
some times later, became more powerful and hereditary too, who being
non-Aryan Kshatriyas, were known as Raj-putra or Rajputs of medieval
period. 20Sometimes this period of evolution, from tribe to royal
Rajput family, is very long and uncountable.
Foot
notes :
13.
Jayaswal KP. -15.
14.VP
(Wilson) II P-659.
15.
Jayaswal KP. P-16.
16.
Jayaswal KP. P-29.
17.
Ibid.
18.
Ibid.
19.
(a) Jayaswal KP . "Hindu Polity" P-46 ..
(b)
Bhandarkar DR "Lecture on the Ancient History of India"
PP-169-70.
20.
Katyayan comments on Panini IV -1-168.
JANAPAD
SHABDAT KSHATRIYATDN.
KSHATRIYA
DEKARAJA TSANGHA PRA TISHE DHARTHAM".
Nagas,
the Ancient Rulers of India, their Origin and History 363
[p.333]:
belonging to the same blood or tribe became kig. Others who were
pushed to Jungles or hills still remained tribe. Some of the Bhars
and the Rajbhars of this region (UP) are still known as Rajputs
21 others are still Sudras by caste. Hence Jayaswal cannot say that
Bhar tribes of this region cannot be blood relatives of royal families
of Manda and and Vijayapur.
Another
argument of Jayaswal goes in my favorite. He says. "The Bhar
Deul Shiv's temple, as indicated by learned scholar is covered all
over with the figures of naga (serpent) kings. As recorded by Kittoe
in whose time it was called the temple of KarKota Nag". ThiS
evidently supports this view that the Bhar here stands for Bharsivas
. 22 This is to be noted that Karkota Nag was worshipped by the
Takas 23, who were progenitor of Bharshivas. These Takas or Takka
or Takshak Nagas according to the Mahabharat account were non-Aryan
Native Naga tribe and sworn enemies ot Aryan Pandavas {See chapter
VI P-144 and X P-261 for detail.
Re-establishment
of Nagas :
Naga
temple at Chinta (Bhadarvah), Courtesy: Vogel JPH
The Bharshivs, in the later days of imperial Kushans or about 150
AD reached Kantipur on the Ganges, they performed there Ashwamedh
and coronations at or near Banaras where is located the place known
as Nagwa, the present site of the Hindu University seems to be associated
with their name. From Kantipur, they moved westwards under Virsena,
who strikes coins extensively and whose coins are found from Ahichchhatra,
regains Padmavati and Mathura.
Is
It Stated In The Vayu And Brahmand Purans That Rule Of Navanag Was
Not Only Confined To Samayukta Prant Alone But Also To The East
And The Western Bihar Also Because Their Capital Was In Mathura
As Well As In Champavati - Bhglpur. The Purans, give to the Padmavati
and the Mathura Nagas or in view of the Vishnu, to the Padmavati,
Kantipuri - Mathura Nagas, -seven successions. This is fully borne
out by the names gathered from the coins and inscriptions as tabulated
below after Jayaswal :
Gautamiputra,
son of the Emperor Pravarsen an ather of Rudrasen I , did not succeed,
but Rudrasen I, both as the grand-son of Pravarsen and as the gran
son of the Bharshiv-Maharaj Bhavnag, succeeded. The Nav Nag ruled
from three capitals Padmavati, Mathura and Kantipuri. But Rudrasena
I judged from Purika .
Sometimes before Samudragupt, (335-375 AD) the Naga kings were ruling
over Eran. As, Padmavati, Kantlpuri and Mathura were three centers
of their rule, the Eran-Vidisa was fourth. Naga coins have been
recovered in a very large number from this region. All these
four kingdoms were inter-related with each other and perrhaps, they
all unitedly encountered the attacks of Kushans and Scythians and
pushed them back from their motherland. These Naga kings were
great warriors. According to Cunningham, from the lonly finding
of a coin, from the remains of Eran, we get information from its
writing, which is in Brahmi, that ancients name of the city was
'Erikiran' which was most porobable named after some famous Naga
King of similarr name. The coins of Ravli-Naga, Basu-Naga and Ganapati-Nagas
have been recovered in a very large number from Vidisha and Eran.
Bharshivas
of Padmavati; A confederacy of Naga Rulers of North
We have already thrown light in Chapter V and VI (PP - 132-33) that
the basis of Naga polity was tribal republican confederacy or Gan
Sangha system very similar to that of Sumerian.
Foot
notes :
26.
Jayaswal KP. P-17.
27.
Jayaswal KP.. P-15.
28.
Bajpai Atima, "Madhyapradesh Ke Nagbanshi Sikke" PP 115-17.
29.
Hawkes Jacquetta, "The First Great Civilization" PP 160-161.
[p.335]:
We know that the West Asia was the original home of Nagas from where
this tradition was transferred to Indus Valley along with their
migration in Neolithic-Chalcolithic Age and was prevalent among
the native people in Vedic and later Vedic period.
During
the life time of Buddh and later period there were many such confederacies
of Naga people in North as well as in South India such as Malava
- Kshudraka, Andhak - Vrishani, Vaishali - Videh, Videha - Lichchhavi,
Lichchavi - Malla, Vujji, Trigarttashashtha (in north and west),
Naga (chera) Mandal in south.
Jayaswael
KP gives an account of political organization of Bharshivas as follows
:
"The
system of the Naga government was a federation consisting of (1)
tree mam monarchial Naga families, one of which, the Bharashiva,
was the imperial leader (chief), with a number of gubernatorial
families under him, (2) a number Of Republics. Two Branches At Padmavati
And Mathura were Set Up By the Bharshivas, With Distinguishing Dynastic
Titles Of Their Own. the Padmavati Dynasty had the Official Designation
the Taka Bansh, Which Is Given In the Bhavasatak A Book Dedicated
To Ganapati-Ng. was Mathura family had the official title-the Yadu-Bansh
which is mentioned in the drama Kaumudimahotsav writtten about the
same time as the Bhavasatak. The two titles incidentally furnish
ethnological data of the Nav Nags .... Padmavati family was thus
a sovereign family, and their subordination to the Bharshiv was
evidently of an imperial type. The Mathura family and the family
to which Nagdatt (father of Maharaj Mesvara Naga of the Lahore seal)
beelonged and who ruled somewhere in Ambala district probably at
the old capital Shrughna, seem to have been under the direct control
of the Bharsiva . There was a ruling family nearIndrapur (Indorker)
In The District Of Bulandshahar K As regards Bharsivas they had
their two centers, Kantipuri and Padmavati. The Mathura family never
minted any coin but the Padmavati family did so from the beginning
to the end. They were thus a sovereign family. "It is obvious
Bharsivas were racially - Yadavas and of Taka Bansha. Political
confederacy system was their peculiarity.
An Invincible and Prosperous Confederacy :
We have earlier (Chapter-VI PP 133-34) told that the Nagas were
great warriors, that is why they pushed back Kushans and Scythians
from Northern India. The sworn enemy of these non-Aryan republicans,
Kautilya has expressed his view that these republicans were invincible.
KP Jayaswal also puts forth his remarks on this issue - "The
other chief feature of his (republican) constitution was that he
emphasized on his citizens the duty to acquire military skill."
Foot
notes :
30.
Jayaswal KP. "Hindu Polity" PP 38, 50-52, 54-55.
31.
Jayaswal KP., "History of India" PP 33-34.
32.
Jayaswal KP., "Hindu Polity" P-119.
33.
Jayaswal KP., "Hindu Polity" PP-54-55.
[p.336]:
had a civilian army. Each state was a nation-in-arms. Conversely,
the other class, where the 'king' consul constitution obtained,
probably had, like monarchs a regular or hired army. The nation-in-arms
class, however, did not become purely military, for their constitution
also required their citizens to devote attention to industry and
agriculture (VARTIASASTROPAJIVINAH, AS XI-I-160 P-376). Hence they
were most wealthy as well as powerful "It shows while in peace,
citizens were kept engaged in craft activities and trade which was
their main occupation.
Padmavati;
the Capital of Bharshivs :
Is There A Small Village Named Karavati, Situated On The Dabra (Distt-Gwalior)
Shivpuri Road K At a distance of 10 KM to the west of this village
at the junction of rivers Sindh and Parvati (Sindhu and Para) the
ancient grand city of Padmavati 34 was located. Now-a-days this
place is known as Pavaya or Padam Pavaya . It is very interesting
to note that during the rainy season, a very large number of coins
belonging to the Naga rulers appear at the surlace. These coins
have made the historians enable to identify this ancient Naga city.
The first mention of this city as Padmavati, is made in the Vishnupuran
where it is stated that the Nava-Nagas made, Padmavati, Kantipuri
and Mathura their capitals and ruled for seven generations.
Bhavabhuti has stated that 'Padmavati is located near the junction
of the rivers Sindhu, Para' Lavan and Madhumati. Later following
the information given by MB Lele in his Marathi book titled 'Malatimadhava
sar ani kiwar', the Department of Archeology discovered this ancient
site. According to a critical study of coins, Virsen was the founder
of the kingdoms of Padmavati and Mathura .
Nav
Nagas founded a large mint in Padmavati, from where coins were issued
in a very large number, on the basis of which it is surmised that
the Navnags, in addition to their high virtues of being most expert
and talented rulers, were also most prosperous. One of the well
known peculiarities of Naga coins is that they are all dated. They
have figures of palm trees and a human figure seated on a throne.
40 The palm tree is a Naga symbol. Since Sanskrit word for mint
is Tak-shala [Taka] (Bharshiv) + Shal this shows these Taka-Bharsiva
had some hand in taking new technique or workshop of casting of
coins.
The
demolished remains of strong fort on the junction of the rivers
still give a reminiscent view. From the defense point of view, because
it, was surrounded by in-exhaustable flow of river water from two
sides and, on the other two sides by deep trenches, it was most
safe and invincible. The trenches were 20 feet deep and were occupied
by either furious lions or river water. The traces of these trenches
are still visible.
Foot
notes :
34.
ASR (1915–16) P-103.
35.
ASR (1915-16) P-105.
36.
VP (Wilson) II P-659.
37.
Jayaswal KP. - "History of India" PP 20-21 and 35.
38.
ASR (1915-16) P-102.
39.
ASR (1915-16) P-103.
40.
(a) Jayswal KP. PP 20-27. (b) Smith VA, "Coins of Indian Museum"
P-191.
41.
ASR 1915-16 P-lOO Footnote.
[p.337]:
Bhavabhuti, the famous Sanskrit poet of seventh century AD composed
his valuable scripture, at Padmavati. Bhavabhuti got constructed
a large Yajnashala (sacrificial lace) at the bank of river Paravati,
its remains are still in good condition.
Virasen
:
In about 175 or 180 AD, we find a Naga king named Virasen re-establishing
Nag sovereignty at Mathura. According to Dr. Jayaswal, the rise
of Virasen was a turning point not only in the Nag history but also
in the history of Aryavart. His coins have been found in Northern
India, almost all over Uttar Pradesh and in the Punjab. They are
most common around Mathura. He occupied Mathura and ruled all over
the Aryavart Doab. An inscription of Virasen was discovered by Sir
Richhard Burn. There are a number of broken sculptures and carved
pieces and the inscription is on the head and mouth of a sculptured
animal. The inscription is dated in the 13th year of the reign of
Svamin Virasen. Virasen assumed full sovereignty from the first
year of his reign. It appears that he ousted the Kushanas from Mathura
and the whole of the Doab between the Ganga and the Yamuna. Virasen
had a fairly long reign and according to Dr. Jayaswal he ruled from
about 170 AD to 210 AD The same writer is of the opinion that 'the
intimate connection between his coins and coins of the undoubtedly
Bharasiva king, the Naga emblem on his coins as if to complete his
name, the period of his rise and his doubt himself at Mathura mark
Virasen out as one of the earliest Bharashiv Nagas of the inscriptions
and the Nav Nags of the Purans.'
Bhav
Nag :
According to Jayaswal, there were four kings after Virasen. Hay
Nag, Tray Nag, Brahin Nag, Charaj Nag. Bhav Nag ruled from about
290 to 315 AD Dr. Jayaswal made it clear that he had fixed the date
of Bhav Nag on a consideration of the Vakatak and Gupta chronology.
Bhav Nag was a contemporary of Pravarsen I who was an elder contemporary
of Samudra Gupt. Bhav Nag is described as belonging to, the family
of the Bharashivs whose royal line owed its origin to the great
satisfaction of Sivathat was caused by their carrying a Sivaling
placed as a load upon their shoulder and who were besprinkled on
the forehead with the pure water of the Bhagirathi that had been
obtained by their valor.
Foot
notes :
42.
ASR 1915-16 P-lOl.
43.
Jayaswal KP. P-19.
44.
Jayaswal KP. -21.
45.
Jayaswal KP. -23.
46.
Jayaswal KP. P-27.
47.
Jayaswal KP. P-17.
Nags
in Hinduism :
A festival of Nag Panchami is celebrated in Hindus to pay respect
to Nags. The five Nags worshipped on Nag Panchami are Anant, Vasuki,
Taxak, Karkotak and Pingal. According to a Puranic myth Brahma's
son Kashyap had four wives. Kashyapa's first wife gave birth to
Devs, second to Garudas, third to Nagas and fourth to Daityas. The
third wife of Kashp was called Kadroo, who gave birth to Nagas.
So Nagas are also known as Kadrooj. They were the rulers of Patal-Lok.
There is a Sanskrit shlok to remember important nine Nagas as under:
(Dainik Bhaskar 30 July 2006)
Anant
Vasukin Sheshan Padmanabhancha Kambalam. Anantam Vasukim Shesham
Padmanabham cha Kambalam
Shankhpalam Dhartarashtra Takshakam Kalyan and. Shankhapalam Dhartarashtram
Taxakam Kaliyam tatha
Ethani
Navnamani Ch Mahatmanam. Etani navanamani cha mahatmanam
Nags
in Mahabharat :
The Mahabharat Book 2: SECTION IX Sabha Parv Kisari Mohan Ganguli,
tr.1883-1896 mentions names of following naga kings who attended
the Sabha of Yudhishthir.
Vasuki
and Takshak and the Nag called Airavat; Krishna and Lohit; Padma
and Chitra endued with great energy; the Nags called Kamval and
Aswatar; and Dhritarashtr and Valahak; Matimat and Kundadhar and
Karkotak and Dhananjay; Panimat and the mighty Kundaka, O lord of
the Earth; and Prahlad and Mushikad and Janamejay - all having auspicious
marks and mandalas and extended hoods these and many other snakes.
These have been described from shloka 8 to 11 as under :
Vasukis
Takkshak Chave Nagash Charavatsas Tada
Krishnash Ch Lhitash Chaw Padmash Chitrash Ch Semenwan. 8.
Kambalashvataro Nagou Dhritarashtra Balahkau
Maniman Kundaldhar : Karkataka Dhananjayou. 9.
Parahalath Mushikadash f Tadaiv Janamejay
Patkin Mandalin: Phanvantash Ch Sarvah. 10.
Ate Chanye f Bhv? Srpas Tsyan Yudhisthir
Upasate Mahatmanam Varunam Vigataklam: 11.
Genealogy of Nag Kshatriyas :
The list of rulers in the genealogy of Nag kshatriyas, as
provided by Kishori Lal Faujdar, is as under :
Kshesh,
Wasuki, Arawati, Tkshk, Krcotk, Dntrrjay, Kalia, Naninath, Ayurana
(Funiy), Fitrgrk, Alawat, Wamn, Nil, Anil, Klmas, Kshbl, Aryk, Ugrak
Kalash, folk, Sumnd, Diigmuk, Nimal Pindak, Shankh, Bial Shiv, Vishtavc,
Imeguh, Nhus, Fidagl, Bahya Vart, ?astipd, Nunder, Findk, mortar,
Ashwatr, Kalisk, Fhl, Tiun Danvartak, Kshnkmuk, Khushmandk, Semk,
Chindark, Krwir, Fuspdnd, Vilvak, Fandhur, Nuskadi, Kshnksira, Furnamdra,
?aridrak, Aprajit, Jotik, Fnng, Shravh, Kurwy, Dritrstr, Kshnkpind,
Virja, Suvhu, Kshalipind, ?aritpind, Fithrk, Sumuk, Konaya, edition,
Kuthr, Khutrgr, Frbakr, Khusd, ?alk, Khumudaksh, Tittr, Mahasarp,
Kadanm, Bahumulak, Karkar, Kundaudar, Mahodar.
Nagavanshi
kings in Mahabharat :
Mahabharat counts following more Naga clans - Ahi, Shivatra, (Khet)
Ashit, Serbhak, Sevridh, Astin, Kantat, Spaj, Anat, Kulik, Shankhapal,
Darvi, Achaswa, Ajgar, Aligi, Vilagi, Orivish, Karikrat, Kasnihla
, Ti, Naimarat, Pridaku, Pridami, Rajju, Lohitahi, Ratharvi, Vahas,
Serbha.
The
Nagavanshi kings had a symbol of Nag or serpent on their coins and
flags. The coins of Nagavanshi rulers are still found at village
Ahar in Bulandshar district in Uttar Pradesh. These coins depict
symbols of Nagas on them. There is mention of Nagas in Mahabharata
in a story in which Duryodan poisoned Bhim to kill and thrown into
Ganga River. When he was foating inriver he reached village Ahar
where the Nagavanshi rulers took him out from Ganga River and gave
treatment to cure. After treatment he was sent to Hastinapur.
The
names of the principal Naga Chiefs in Mahabharat :
Mahabharat (1,35) (Birth of Nagas) - the name of principal
Naga chiefs were mentioned as :
Sesh
(Nag Anant) was the foremost, and then Vasuki. Then were born Airavat,
Takshak, Karkotak (linked with Nal, king of Nishadh), Dhananjay,
Kalakeya (was also mentioned as an Asur clan), the serpent Mani,
Puran, Pinjarak and Elapatra, Vaman, Nil, Anil, Kalmash, Saval,
Aryak, Ugra, Klspotk, Surmuk, Ddimuk, Vimalapindak, APTA, Krotk,
Smk, Valisikh, Nisthank, ?mguh, Nhus
(Nahusha Was Also Described As A King In The Lunar Dynasty, Fururvs
(First King OF Lunar Dynasty) -> Ayus -> Nhus), Pingal,
Vahyakarn, Hastipad, Mudgarapindak, Kamval Aswatara, Kliyk, Vritt,
Smwartk, Fdm, Nahpdm, Snkmuk, Khushmndk, Kshemk, Finderk, Krvir,
Fuspdnshtrk, Vilwak, Vilwapandar, Nushikd, Snksirs, Furnbdra, ?aridrak,
Aprjit, Jyotik, Shrivh, Kurwy, Dritrstr (ALSO Mentioned us a Gandharv
King), Snkpind, Virajas, Suvhu, Slipind, Frbkr, ?astipind, Fithrk,
Sumuksh, Kunpsn, Kuthr, Khutrgr, Khumud, Khumudksh, Tittri, ?alik,
Krdm, Vahumulak, stridor, Akrkr, Khundodr and Mahodar.
Mahabharat
: At (5,103) ( Matali 's history) the name of principal Naga chiefs
were mentioned as :
Vasuki,
Tkshk, Krcotk, Dnjay, Kliy (Linked With River Yamuna And Krishna
In The Mahabart, Nhus (Also A King Belonging To Lunar Dynasty),
Aswatr, Vakyakund, gem, Apurn, Khg, Vaman, Elptr, Khukur, Khukun,
Aryk (linked with Bhim), Nandaka, Kalas, Fotk, Klilsk, Fitrgrk,
Airwat, Sumnmuk, Ddimuk, Snk, Nnd, Upnandk, Apta, Khotrk, Siki,
Nisthurk, Tittiri, ?astibdra, Khumud, Naylpindk, The Two Padmas,
Funderik, floral, Nudgarprnk, Krvir, Fithrk, Smwritt, Vritta, Finder,
Vilwapatra, Nushikd, Sirisk, Dilip, Snk-Sirs, Jyotisk, Aprjit, Kurwy,
Dritrstr, Khuhr, Krisk, Virajas, Drn, Svhu, Nukr, transported, Vidhira,
blind, Visundi, Viras and Saras.
Mahabharat
: At (14,4) (Last moments of Bal Ram ) the name of principal Naga
chiefs were mentioned as :
Karkotak
and Vasuki and Takshak and Prithusravs and Varun and Kunjar and
Misri and Sankh and Kumud and Pundarik, Dhritarashtra and Hrad and
Krath and Sitikanth of fierce energy and Chakramand and Atishanda,
Durmukh and Amvarish and king Varun.
Mahabharat
: At (1,65) (Genesis) the names of the sons of Kadru were mentioned
as :
Sesh
or Anant, Vasuki, Takshak, Kumara and Kulik are known to be the
sons of Kadru.
Mahabharat
: At (2,9) Nagas linked with Varun were mentioned as :
Vasuki,
Tkshk and The Nag Called Airavat, Krishna and Lohita, Fdm, Chitr
Kmwl, Aswatr, Dritrstr, Valahaka, Natimt, Khunddhar, Krcotk, Dntrrjay,
Fnimt, Khundk, Frhld, Mushikad, and Janamejay and Varun. Many asurs
also is mentioned as Varuna. Nagas, Daityas (a clan of Asurs), Sadhyas
and inferior Devas were mentioned to follow Varun (3,41).
Naga
clan of Jats :
According to historian Ram Swarup Joon, the facts about Nagas are
different from those mentioned in brahmanical records. This dynasty
belonged to Madrak Jat gotra of Yadav Vansh and were devotees of
Shiv. They had a number of ruling dynasties such as Takshak Nag,
Bachak Nag, Kilkil Nag, Karkotak, Kaliramn, etc. all of which are
Jat gotras. Mathura, Padmavati and Kantipur were capitals of Nag
dynasty. Nagas of Padmavati were called Taank, which is also a Jat
gotra, and are found in 24 villages near Sonipat.
In
chapter 29 of "India of the Dark Ages" the ancestor of
Tanks is mentioned as Raja Gajavaktra. In chapter 42 of the same
book it is mentioned that Malla Jat Republic extended from Eastern
Punjab to the Ganga and Yaudheya republic extended into Rajasthan.
Nagpur belonged to the Nagas the Nagar Brahmins also originated
from there.
The
Pauranic prejudice in the story is understandable. The Jats who
followed Buddhism were considered renegades and those who adopted
Vaishnavism became staunch Hindus.
Nag
gotra (clan) of Jats are found in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana
and Punjab.
Source
:
https://www.jatland.com/
home/Naga