TAKSHAK

Taxak, Takshak, Tokas, Tokas, Togas, Taksham is Jat Gotra, who are found in India, Pakistan and Central Asia. They are found in Delhi, Haryana, Punjab and Rajasthan[8] states in India. James Tod places it in the list of Thirty Six Royal Races. The Takshaks or Takiuks of Scythia, invaded India about six centuries before Christ.

 

Origin :

James Tod writes that The Indo-Scythic tribes were designated by the names of animals. The Barahas are the hogs; the Numries, the foxes; Takshaks, the snakes; Aswas or Asi, the horses, etc.

 

Genealogy of Suryavansh

They are said to be descended from Nagavanshi king named Taxaka.

 

Branches of Nagavansh are - 1. Vasati / Bains 2. Taxak 3. Aulak 4. Kalkal 5. Kala / Kalidhaman / Kalkhande 6. Meetha 7. Bharshiv 8. Bharaich.

 

Regarding the origin of the Taxak Jats various theories have been propounded by the authors of history. They are summarized herein under. Alexander Cunningham states :

 

“According to the Mahabharat and the Purans, the Takshaks were the descendants of the Takshak, one of the many sons of Kasyapa by his Naga wife Kadru. Other sons were called Naga, Karkotaka, Vasuki, Sesha, Mahapadma, &c., all of whom were equally regarded as kings of the serpents, while their names are used quite indiscriminately to designate the ophite race. Thus Nagas Karkotakas, and Takshakas are all names of but one and the same people. As descendants of Kadru, they are also called Kudravas and Kadraveyas. This name I find upon three very old cast coins in my own possession, given in its pali form as Kadasa. The coins are of two different types, but in all the specimens the name is accompanied by the figure of a snake. This pictorial illustration of the name seems to me quite sufficient to prove that these coins must belong to the ophiolatrous race of Kadravas, and as the coins were obtained in the Western Punjab, while the characters are similar to those of Asoka’s inscriptions, they may be attributed with much confidence to the early Takkas of Takka-desa.”

 

History :

Ram Sarup Joon writes ... Many names in the Genealogical tables of Yayati are associated with present Jat gotras. Some examples are Ushinar, Shishu Bhadra, Tak or Takshak, Satoti, Krishan or Kushana from the Yadhu branch; Dushyanta, Bharat, Bhardwaja, Hasti, Ajmirh, Kaushik, Gadh and Vishwamitra of Puru branch; Seth, Arh, Gandhi, Gaindhu and Gandhar of the Ardas branch.

 

Ram Swarup Joon writes In the Sabha Parv, Mahabharata / Book II Chapter 48, while describing various Kings who attended a ceremony in the Durbar (court) of Maharaja Yudhisthira, seventeen names are mentioned which are today found as Jat gotras. These are Malhia, Mylaw, Sindhar, Gandhar, Mahity, Mahe, Savi, Bath, Dharan, Virk, Dard, Shaly, Matash, Kukar (Khokar) Kak, Takshak, Sand, Bahik (Bathi) Bije (Bijenia), Andhra, Sorashtra (Rathi) Mann, Ar, Sohat, Kukat, Othiwal (Othval).

 

The Shavi dynasty :

 

Ram Sarup Joon writes....One branch of Shavi Gotra is Takshak. Before the Mahabharat, they ruled the area of present Delhi, which was then known as Khanduban. Their capital was known as Khand Prastha. When Dharat Rashtra divided his kingdom into two, Yudhishtra selected Khand Prastha as his capital, named it Indraprastha and started constructing palaces and forts. Takshaks opposed this project, refused to vacate the area and tried to demolish the buildings at night. This led to war. Pandavas defeated the Takshaks, destroyed their villages and drove them out of this area. Consequent upon this incident in the Mahabharat, Takshaks joined Duryodhana’s army and fought against the

 

Pandavs. A Takshak warrior killed king Parikshit, a grandson of Yudhishtr. These facts are mentioned in Adi Parv of Mahabharat.

 

At present, there are five villages of Takshak Jats in this area viz. Mohammed Pur, Manirka, Shahpura, Haus Khas and Katwaria.

 

On being driven out of Khanduban, the Takshaks drifted North west and made their new capital at Takshala or Taxila, This view is confirmed in ‘A Guide to Taxila’. The Takshaks also founded Takshkand later known as Tashkand or Tashkent and Takshasthan later known as Turkistan. The Takshaks of Taxila later adopted the abbreviated title of Taki and are still found in that area as Muslim Jats of Taki Gotra or clan. When Mudrak Raja Subhagsen of Ghazni was driven east by the Iranians, he also had to fight a battle with Takis of Taxila.

 

The rulers of Magdha of the Shesh Nag Dynasty were Takshak Jats. Todd writes that they ruled Mugdha for six hundred years.

 

Todd writes that Chittor, then known as Jattor was the capital of Mori branch of Takshaks. Gehlot Jats later occupied it.

 

Ram Swarup Joon writes that Shavi was the son of the king Ushinar. He was a Yogi and an ascetic. He was married to, Sati the daughter of king Daksha. After her death he married Parvati. His seat of tapasya was on the Gangotri Mountain. He had two sons, Smokartik and Ganpati (Ganesh).

 

The Shavi dynasty prospered well. The Descendants of his dynasty are famous as Takshak, Bachak, Bharhaich, Nags etc. Shavi founded the country of Shavisthan (Siestan) in Iran and also the Island of Jatoli. They also founded kingdoms of Turkistan and Scandinavia.

The Shavi rulers constructed the Shorkot fort in Jhang.

 

In Iran there is a Mausoleum of prophet Shish. Hieun T-sang and Fahien have also called Iran as Shavi country.

Ram Swarup Joon writes about Takshak, It is mentioned in the "Vishnu Purana' that before the Pandavas, the Takshaks ruled the earth. Takshaks belong to the Shavi dynasty. In the 29th generation of king Shavi, one of the six sons of king Sototi was Takshak. According to genealogical tables of the Yayati dynasty King Satoti is considered by the Tartars to be their ancestor. Takshak, Bachak etc. are also called the Nags. There are ample references to these people in local and foreign histories. According to Mahabharata 'Adi Parva', before the Pandavas, Khandoban (Indraprastha) was the capital of the Takshak rulers. They created obstacles in the way of construction of the capital by Pandavas. Finally, these people were defeated, rendered homeless and driven out.

 

They went and settled down in Taxila (Taksila). In the battle of Mahabharata they joined the Kauravas and killed king Parikshit. They founded Takshakkhad (Tashkand) and Takshaksthan (Turkistan).

At present Takshal and Tokas gotras are found among the Jats in five villages near Delhi. The Takshak Jats is found spread all over Northern India, Pakistan and Central Asia. ( Tokas is found also in Romania)

 

Tartar and Naga connection :

King Satoti is considered by the Tartars to be their ancestor. Takshak and Bachak are also called the Nagas (the "serpent people" of Hindu and Buddhist mythology).

 

The Takshak of Punjab :

There is a description of seven Mahanagas in Mayashilpa. They are : Basuki, Takshak, Karkotak, Padam, Mahapadam, Sankhpaul and Kulika. In Skand Puran, Takshak Nag has also been called Mahanag (77/17,18;106/5,6,7). These Takshak, or Takkhas were of Taka family, since the words Takkhas or Takka or Taka are corrupt forms of Takshaka and in Sanskrit language, Takshak means Nag or serpent, hence they were Nagas.

 

As a matter of fact, totem tradition was a peculiarity of indigenous people of ancient India. As such these Takshakas or Nagas used to worship serpents and at certain occasions wore artificial hoods of cobra on their heads, hence were called serpents or Nagas. These people, in origin were inhabitants of Panjab or Indus Valley. Still three parts of this land are known as Taka, Majha (Madra) and Malava, which were ruled by three royal families or blood relatives of the same names. Malava is Southern part of Satluj river, land between Beas and Jhelam in general, is known as Majha and whole North-Western part beyond Jhelam or present Pakistan is known as Taka. This Taka is named after the name of royal family of Taka. One province of Afghanistan is still called Takhar. Name of their tribe was Andhra.

 

The name of Takshak Nag first appears in the Mahabharata as opponent of Pandavas. Hence, this seems to be one of the most ancient royal families of Naga race, who gave birth to the most of the Naga royal families of ancient India. Their capital was Taka-shar (Taki or Takka-war) near Sialkot. Cunningham mentions other names of this city as Taki and Asurar (of Assyrians). Their ancient traditional capital was Takshila. H. L. Kosare after Mahabharat informs that Arattas had their three branches Takka, Vahika and Jertika.

 

In Mahabharat, the family Gotra of Takas has been given Karpati and among them, along with the Malavas of Rajasthan and Panjab, Panch-karpatis also have been included. These were people of republic society. It seems that they were relatives of their nearest neighbourers, the Malavas. These Malavas used to worship Karkota Nag, hence Takas were also believed to be worshipers of above deity. They later shifted from Panjab to Rajasthan and settled there in the east. It is clear that Takas were republicans or guild or Sangha people. They had their two other families or blood relatives Malavas and Madras and their Gotra was Karpati.

 

Madras were called Vahika and Jertika. Hemchandra, in his Abhidhan Chintamani (lV-25) has equated Vahikas with Takas. These Takas were Vahika Nagas, therefore Vahikas, Jertikas and Madras were also Nagas and all the four Naga tribes were blood relatives of Arattas . There was a tribal confederacy of Taka Nagas in Panjab that is why the Panjab was known as Taka-Mulka or Taka-country as mentioned by Hieuntsang. It is obvious that Vahikas were from Taka family.

 

Some scholars think these Jertikas were Jats. Taka or Takshakas and Vahikas appear in the Mahabharata period (950 B.C.) where as Kushanas, the progenitors of Jats appear on the horizon of history about 1000 ears later, as invaders from North. On the other hand Jat is the name of a gotra of Taka kshatriyas. Dr Naval Viyogi hence on this basis concludes that above Jat is not related to Jat caste or Kushanas but Takas. Jat in the Nagavansha were already there on the Indian soil. This is also confirmed from presence of large number of Jat Gotras originated from Nagavansh.

 

It has been observed, that ancient inscriptions in the Pali or Buddhist character have been discovered in various parts of Rajasthan of the race called Tastas, Takshak and Tak relating to the tribes, the Mori (or Maurya) Parmar their descendants. Nagas and Takshakas are synonymous appellation in Sanskrit for the snake, and the Takshak is the celebrated Nagavansha of the early heroic history of India. The Mahabharata describes in its usual allegorical style the war between the Pandavs of Indraprasth and the Takshaka of the North. The assassination of Parikshita by the Takshak and the exterminating warfare carried on against them by his son and successor, Janmejay, who at last compelled them to sign tributary engagements, divested of its allegory, is plain historical fact. Their warfare lasted for a longer period, ultimately progeny of Pandavas had to leave Hastinapur while the city was washed away in a terrible flood of the river Ganga at about 800 B.C. Later on it was taken over by the Nagas.

 

"In the Bhavishya Puran." According to James Tod" Prince Sahasra-Arjuna is termed as Chakravartin or paramount sovereign. It is said that he conquered Karkotaka of the Takshak, Turushka or snake race and brought with him the population of Mahishmati and founded Hemnagara in the North India, on his expulsion from his dominions on the Narbuda. Traditional legends of this prince yet remain on the Narbuda, where he is styled "Sahasrabahu or with a thousand arms," figurative of his numerous progeny. The Takshak or snake race, here alluded to, will engage our attention. The name of animals in early time, planets and things inanimate, all furnished symbolic appellations for various races."

 

It is evident that race of Takshak, being at the entry gate of India in North West not only suffered at the hand of invaders from North and West but also those from South.

 

From the Mahabharat account, Son of Takshak was Ashwasena who was saved by Indra, while Khandavavana was put into flame by Pandav Arjun (1000 BC-950 BC).

 

It seems that there was also possession of Nagas over Gandhar country in the time of Parshvanath, because Nagjit or Naget, the king of Gandhar, has been said to be the follower of Parashwanath. Perhaps this Naga king Nagjit would have been related to Takshaka since country of Gandhara or Takshila was their main centre of rule from remote past. We know that the primogenitor of Naga, according to Mahabharat was Rajrishi Kashyap, who was national guru of Parswanath also.

 

During the life time of Buddha (567-487 BC), Takshila was the capital of Gandhar country or the modern Kandhar. Then, the king of Gandhar was Pukkusati, who is said to have sent an embassy and a letter to king Bimbisara of Magadha. He was a follower of Buddha. He died in his old age on his first and last trip to Magadha, a week after his meeting with Buddha.

 

Like Nanda dynasty, Taka family also suffered at the hands of Puranic Chronicles. Contemporary Puranas have ignored pedigree and chronology of this family in general. However we have traced out a very handful names from different sources; when Alexander invaded India (325 BC) he found the Paraitakai, the mountain (Pahar) Tak, inhabiting the Paropamisos range; nor is it by any means unlikely that Taxiles [Arrian says that his name was Omphis (Ambhi)]. Hence, perhaps (from Tak), the name of Indus Attok, not Atak or forbidden according to modern signification the ally of the Macedonian king, was the chief of the Takas; and in the early history of the Bhatti prince of Jaisalmer, when driven from Zabulistan, they dispossessed the Takas on the Indus, and established themselves in their land the capital of which was called Salivahanpura. It is by no means unlikely that Salivahana or Salbhan (who was a Takshaka) the conqueror of the Tuar Vikram, was of the very family dispossessed by the Bhattis who compelled them to migrate to the South.

 

These Takas or Takshakas, whose chief was Omphis or Ambhi, was a snake worshiper tribe as noted by the Greek historian M.C. Crindle. He reproduces as such,

 

"They found in many of them besides other animals, a snake, which the Indians regarding as sacred, kept in a cave and worshiped with much devotion. The Indians accordingly with every kind of entreaty implored Alexander to let no one molest the animal, and he consented to this (Strabo XV-1-28). Now when the army was marching past the cave the snake heard the sound that arose (that kind of animal being very sharp both of hearing and sight) and hissed so loud and emitted such gusts of rage that everyone was terrified and quite confounded. It was said to be seventy cubits long, and yet the whole of it was not seen, except its head that projected from the cave its eyes, moreover are reported to have equaled the size of the large round Mecedonian shield."

It shows these Naga worshipers were of Naga race whose chief Ambhi was of Takshak race.

 

The ancient inscriptions in the Pali Buddhist character have been discovered in various parts of Rajasthan of the race of Taxak or Tak, relating to the tribe Mori and Parmara are their descendants. Taxak Mori was the lord of Chittor from very early period.

 

The Huna Kingdom of Sialkot (of Mihir Kula 515-540 AD), destroyed by Yashodharman, was subsequently seized by a new dynasty of kshatriyas called Tak or Taxak. The Taxak Mori as being lords of Chittor from very early period and few generations after the Guhilots supplanted the Moris, this palladium of Hindu liberty was assailed by the arms of Islam. (725-35) we find amongst the numerous defenders who appear to have considered the cause of Chittor their own the Tak from Asirgarh. This race appears to have retained possession of Asirgarh for at least two centuries after this event as its chieftain was one of the most conspicuous leaders in the array of Prithvi Raj. In the poems of Chandar he is called the "Standard, bearer, Tak of Asir."

 

Tokas in world history :

Tokas is found also in Romania. Takshak Jats ruled Alexandria in Egypt. Their title was Asi. The Takshak Jats are found spread all over Northern India, Pakistan and Central Asia.

 

In Rajatarangini :

Rajatarangini writes that..... The prime minister Changkuna built in another place a vihar with a chaitya; and Ishanachandra the physician and brother to the wife of Changkuna, having obtained wealth through the favor of Takshak, built a Vihar. The king Lalitaditya further caused a permanent asylum for the poor to be built at Parihasapura, to which he presented one lac and one plates filled with food. He also caused a town to be built in a barren place that thirsty men might find water, there. He invited prudent men from other countries, and brought Changkuna brother of Kangkanavarsha, an alchemist, from Bhuskhar. The king exchanged with this man a statue of Buddha which he brought from Magadh for certain jewels of mysterious properties. This statue Changkuna placed in the monastery which he built, and can be seen to this day, surrounded by iron railings. (Book IV,p.73)

 

Taxak and Jats :

James Tod writes that the tribes here alluded to are the Haihaya or Aswa, the Takshak, and the Jat or Getae; the similitude of whose theogony, names in their early genealogies, and many other points, with the Chinese, Tatar, Mogul, Hindu, and Scythic races, would appear to warrant the assertion of one common origin.

 

Ram Sarup Joon quotes Todd, who writes that the Chauhan King Anhal I, who ruled 39 generations before Prithvi Raj was a Takshak.

 

James Tod on Taxak :

James Tod as a pioneer historian on Jats has to his credit that he thoroughly scrutinized the bardic tales of Rajasthan and Gujarat and also brought to light over a dozen inscriptions on the Jats as well as translated many of them into English. Both of his volumes of Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan reflect his efforts to illuminate the dark patches in History of Jats and as such shed light on our community’s historic contribution in those times in the area of his study. We reproduce the Chapter Chapter 7 Catalogue of the Thirty Six Royal Races from Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, Volume I, Publisher: Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press 1920, pp. 123-127.

 

Tak or Takshak :

Takshak appears to be the generic term of the race from which the various Scythic tribes, the early invaders of India, branched off. It appears of more ancient application than Getae, which was the parent of innumerable sakha. It might not be judicious to separate them, though it would be speculative to say which was the primitive title of the races called Scythic, after their country, Sakatai or Sakadwipa, the land of the great Getae.

 

Abulghazi makes Taunak1 the son of Turk or Targetai, who appears to be the Turushka of the Puranas, the Tukyuks of the Chinese historians, the nomadic Tokhari of Strabo, who aided to overturn the Greek kingdom of Bactria, and gave their name to

 

1 Abulghazi [Hist, of the Turks, Moguls, and Tartars, 1730, i. 5 f .] says, when Noah left the ark he divided the earth amongst his three sons : Shem had Iran : Japhet, the country of ' Kuttup Shamach,' the name of the regions between the Caspian Sea and India. There he lived two hundred and fifty years. He left eight sons, of whom Turk was the elder and the seventh Camari, supposed the Gomer of Scripture. Turk had four sons ; the eldest of whom was Taunak, the fourth from whom was Mogul, a corruption of Mongol, signifying sad, whose successors made the Jaxartes their winter abode. [The word means ' brave ' (Howorth, Hist, of the Mongols, i. 27).] Under his reign no trace of the true religion remained : idolatry reigned everywhere. Aghuz Khan succeeded. The ancient Cimbri, who went west with Odin's horde of Jats, Chattis, and Su , were probably the tribes descended from Camari, the son of Turk.

[p.124]: the grand division of Asia, Tokharistan1 or Turkistan : and there is every appearance of that singular race, the Tajik,2 still scattered over these regions, and whose history appears a mystery, being the descendants of the Takshak.

 

It has been already observed, that ancient inscriptions in the Pali or Buddhist character have been discovered in various parts of Rajasthan, of the race called Tasta, Takshak, and Tak, relating to the tribes, the Mori or Maurya, Pramar, their descendants.

 

Naga and Takshak are synonymous appellations in Sanskrit for the snake, and the Takshak is the celebrated Nagvansh of the early heroic history of India. The Mahabharata describes, in its usual allegorical style, the wars between the Pandavas of Indraprastha and the Takshaks of the north. The assassination of Parikshit by the Takshak, and the exterminating warfare carried on against them by his son and successor, Janamejaya, who at last compelled them to sign tributary engagements, divested of its allegory,3 is plain historical fact.

 

1 Tacash continued to be a proper name with the great Khans of Kharizm (Chorasmia) until they adopted the faith of Muhammad. The father of Jala], the foe of Jenghiz Khan, was named Tacash. Tashkent on the [Jaxartes]], the capital of Turkistan, may be derived from the name of the race. Bayer says, " Tocharistan was the region of the Tochari, who were the ancient T??a?o? (Tochari), or T??a?o? (Tacharoi)." Amraianus Marcellinus says, " many nations obey the Bactrians, whom the Tochari surpass " (Hist. Beg. Bad. p. 7).

2 This singular race, the Tajiks, are repeatedly mentioned by Mr. Elpliinstone in his admirable account of the kingdom of Kabul. They are also particularly noticed as monopolising the commercial transactions of the kingdom of Bokhara, in that interesting work. Voyage d'Orenbourg a Bokhara, the map accompanying which, for the first time, lays down authentically the sources and course of the Oxus and Jaxartes. [The term Tajik means the settled population, as opposed to the Turks or tent-dwellers. It is the same word as Tazi, ' Arab,' still surviving in the name of the Persian greyhound, which was apparently introduced by the Arabs. Sykes (Hist, of Persia, ii. 153, note) and Skrine-Ross {The Heart of Asia, 3, 364 note) state that the Tajiks represent the Iranian branch of the Aryans.]

3 The Mahabharat describes this warfare against the snakes literally : of which, in one attack, he seized and made a burnt-offering (hom) of twenty thousand. It is surprising that the Hindu will accept these things literally. It might be said he had but a choice of difficulties, and that it would be as impossible for any human being to make the barbarous sacrifice of twenty thousand of his species, as it would be difficult to find twenty thousand snakes for the purpose. The author's knowledge of what barbarity will inflict leaves the fact of the human sacrifice, though not perhaps to this extent, not even improbable. In 1811 his duties called him to a survey

[p 125]: When Alexander invaded India, he found the Paraitakai, the mountain (pahar) Tak, inhabiting the Paropamisos range; nor is it by any means unlikely that Taxiles,1 the ally of the Macedonian king, was the chief (es) of the Taks ; and in the early history of the Bhatti princes of Jaisalmer, when driven from Zabulistan, they dispossessed the Taks on the Indus, and established themselves in their land, the capital of which was called Salivahanpura ; and as the date of this event is given as 3008 of the Yudhishthira era, it is by no means unlikely that Salivahana, or Salbhan (who was a Takshak), the conqueror of the Tuar Vikrama, was of the very family dispossessed by the Bhattis, who compelled them to migrate to the south.

 

The calculated period of the invasion of the Takshaks, or Nagvansa, under Sheshnag, is about six or seven centuries before the Christian era, at which very period the Scythic invasion of Egypt and Syria, " by the sons of Togarmah riding on horses " (the Aswas, or Asi), is alike recorded by the prophet Ezekiel and Diodorus. The Abu Mahatma calls the Takshaks " the sons of Himachal," all evincing Scythic descent ; and it was only eight reigns anterior to this change in the Lunar dynasties of India, that Parsvanath, the twenty-third Buddha [Jain Tirthankara], introduced his tenets into India, and fixed his abode in the holy mount Sarnet

 

amidst the ravines of the Chambal, the tract called Gujargarh, a district inhabited by the Gujar tribe. Turbulent and independent, like the sons of Esau, their hand against every man and every man's hand against them, their nominal prince, Surajmall, the Jat chief of Bharatpur, pursued exactly the same plan towards the population of these villages, whom they captured in a night attack, that Janamejaya did to the Takshaks : he threw them into pits with combustibles, and actually thus consumed them ! This occurred not three-quarters of a century ago.

 

1 Arrian says that his name was Omphis [Ambhi], and that his father dying at this time, he did homage to Alexander, who invested him with the title and estates of his father Taxiles. Hence, perhaps (from Tak), the name of the Indus, Attak; not Atak, or ' forbidden,' according to modern signification, and which has only been given since the Muhammadan religion for a time made it the boundary between the two faiths. [All these speculations are valueless.

2 In Bihar, during the reign of Pradyota, the successor of Ripunjaya. Parsva's symbol is the serpent of Takshak. His doctrines spread to the remotest parts of India, and the princes of Valabhipura of Mandor and Anhilwara all held to the tenets of Buddha. [As usual, Jains are confounded with Buddhists. There is no reason to believe that the Nagas, a serpent-worshipping tribe, were not indigenous in India.]

[p.126]: Enough of the ancient history of the Tak ; we will now descend to more modern times, on which we shall be brief. We have already mentioned the Takshak Mori (or Maurya) as being lords of Chitor from a very early period ; and but a few generations after the Guhilots supplanted the Moris, this palladium of Hindu liberty was assailed by the arms of Islam. We find amongst the numerous defenders who appear to have considered the cause of Chitor their own, " the Tak from Asirgarh." 1 This race appears to liave retained possession of Asir for at least two centuries after this event, as its chieftain was one of the most conspicuous leaders in the array of Prithwiraja. In the poems of Chand he is called the " standard-bearer, Tak of Asir."

 

This ancient race, the foe of Janamejaya and the friend of Alexander, closed its career in a blaze of splendour. The celebrity of the kings of Gujarat will make amends for the obscurity of the Taks of modern times, of whom a dynasty of fourteen kings followed each other in succession, commencing and ending with the proud title of Muzaffar. It was in the reign of Muhammad,3 son of the first Tughlak, that an accident to his nephew Firoz proved the dawn of the fortunes of the Tak ; purchased, however, with the change of name and religion. Saharan the Tak was the first apostate of his line, who, under the name of Wajihu-1-mulk, concealed both his origin and tribe. His son, Zafar Khan, was raised by his patron Firoz to the government of Gujarat, about the period when Timur invaded India. Zafar availed himself of the weakness of his master and the distraction of the times, and mounted the throne of Gujarat under the name of Muzaffar.4 He was assassinated by the hand of his grandson, Ahmad, who changed the ancient capital, Anhilwara, for the city founded by himself, and called Ahmadabad, one of the most splendid in the east. With the apostasy of the Tak,5 the name appears to have

 

1 This is the celebrated fortress in Khandesh, now in the possession of the British.

2 In the list of the wounded at the battle of Kanauj he is mentioned by name, as " Chatto the Tak."

3 He reigned from a.d. 1324 to 1351.

4 'The victorious' [see p. 118 above].

5 The Miratu-l-Sikandari gives the ancestry of the apostate for twenty-three generations ; the last of whom was Sesh, the same which introduced the Nagvansa, seven centuries before the Christian era, into India. The author of the work gives the origin of the name of Tak, or Tank, from tarka, ' expulsion,' from his caste, which he styles Khatri, evincing his ignorance of this ancient race.

[p.127]: been obliterated from the tribes of Rajasthan ; nor has my search ever discovered one of this name now existing.

 

Inscriptions about Takshak and Jats by Col Tod :

James Tod discovered many Inscriptions related with Takshak and Jats. You may see them here - Inscriptions about Jats by Col Tod.

 

Takshak: Thakur Deshraj :

Thakur Deshraj wrote .... Takshak - is a very old family. In the ninth century these people ruled in Asirgarh. The Jats of Takshak gotra are in both Malwa and Rajasthan.

 

History :

Thakur Deshraj wrote .... [p.561]: Bhat texts say that Shiv's famous gana Veerabhadra had four women. Among them were born Sonbhadra and Swarnabhadra from Ashadevi, Pawanabhadra from Bhadradevi, Jhashabhadra from Alka Devi, and Dhirbhadra from Mayadevi.

 

Son Dhirbdra Rudradev of Kashmir Rudrakot built the town its name. Rudrabhadra was preceded by Brahmabhadra, Karnabhadra, Jayabhadra, Tamrabhadra, Gyanabhadra, Chakrabhadra, in this dynasty. 2 sons of Chakrabhadra Nagabhadra and Vajrabhadra.

 

Nagabhadra was married to the daughter of Karkotak Nag. Those arising from it are called Takshaka and settled Taxila city.

 

Nagabhadra's other brothers, Vajrabhadra Kreetabhadra, Chandrabhadra, Rorabhadra, Kokabhadra, Tamalabhadra, Meppabhadra, Pullingabhadra, were ruled by generations. Among them, Pulingbhadra moved from Kashmir to the town of Mayapuri, on the banks of the Ganges, which later became famous as Haridwar.

 

Beyond them, this dynasty consisted of Tungabhadra, Purnabhadra, Tejbhadra, Rajabhadra, Meghbhadra and (II) Swarnabhadra. Rana Hariyaditya was in the 40th generation of Swarnabhadra. The city of Mayapuri became famous as Haridwar after her name. Hariaditya was killed by Bhima at Surya Digvijay, the kingdom of the Pandavas.

 

Raja Pejsar, the 16th generation of Rana Hariyaditya, left Haridwar and his offspring were populated by the banks of the Yamuna.

 

[P 0.562]: The Union victory 270 years in Alexander's attack on Punjab Takshak killed fighting descent King Virsinh. They had two sons: 1. Amarsen and 2. Madansen. Amarsen was the overlord of the convergence . It is known that the Greek writers have written Ambsi (Abhisar) as ambhi.

 

Amarsen (Abhisar) had two sons, Vijaydev and Swarnadeva. Many generations ahead of it are not known.

 

Samvat 875 (818 AD.) In Krkdev except converge (Punjab) Dunderkede come and people Donderia become known.

 

Takshak Nagvans :

Dalip Singh Ahlawat writes -

 

The Takshak Jats together with many other Jat dynasties formed an association called Nagavansha. Takshak people are a branch of Nagavansh. L Ramsarup June , Jat History English writes on page 104 that “Takshak people are Chandravanshi. In the tenth generation of Anu 's son Anu , there was a glorious Emperor camp. In the 29th generation of the camp, a son of King Satauti was named Takshak. Takshak dynasty came out in his name because of Takshak's fame. " There was a kingdom of Takshak kings before the Pandavas burnt the Khandava forest and make Indraprastha their capital. Takshak Jats fought fiercely against Arjuna and Shri Krishna. In the end, these people were defeated and went to Takshashila along with the Takshak king and settled down.

 

Due to this malice, the Coast Guard fought in the Mahabharata war against the Pandavas on behalf of Duryodhana. The guards killed Arjunputra Parikshit in his palaces. His son Janamejaya attacked Taxila. But Janmejaya forgives Takshakaraja in consultation with sage Aastiq 1. That the Tkshkvansh gradually Bhashabed stitch, niche, tuck, Tckr, Toks, argument was Lokprasiddh name. The Kashmiri poet Kalhan has written it as part of Gurjar country, referring to the kingdom of Takka. These people were famously powerful. The whole Punjab was jealous of his greatness. China River Nearby, his kingdom was forced by his king Alkhan to give the Virkwanshi Jats to the people between 883 and 901 AD. Before this, Alexander had taken Takshak Vaidya from Taxila with him. Hunsang by Takk the people Taxila is praised gazing glory of the smart residents and wrote a warm nature. Tod saheb wrote the power of the Takshas in Kathanagar on the banks of the Yamuna in the 14th-15th century. 'Madan Parijat' has written the king named Ratnapala, Varhap, Harishchandra, Ordinary, Sahasrapala, Madanpal of this place. This king Madanpal wrote the famous text of Ayurveda 'Madanpalanighantu'. Tod counts the Takshak dynasty among 36 princes and ChittorAnd the ruler of Asirgarh and who settled in the high regions of Asia and the famous hero is written.

 

On the princely state of Tonk, Takshak was a state of Jats. 5 miles north of this is Pirana, a village under the mountain . There was a democratic state of these Jats in it (Jatveer year 8, issue 42, author Ritchpal Singh). These people used to collect tax from the traders passing through their state. Once there the king of Jahangir passed away. The Piranas' chiefs allowed him to take tax from them. On being known, the emperor sent his commander Malukkhan to avenge him. Hearing the might of the Jats, he stayed at Sherpur, a village near Pirana. The Doom (Dome) of the Jats of Pirana came in greed and told Malukkhan that “Bhadon Badi 12 will have a fair (celebration) of the Bachchwars. On that day all men and women swing disarmed and fearless. ”On this festival, Malukkhan surrounded Bachhwaras. The Jatviron of Pirana Sardar Jivnsinh andDespite being disarmed, Raimal broke the heads of fifty enemies. These two brave fighters worked. Some women fighting in this war were also killed. In this way this democratic state of the Jats was destroyed. (Jat History, p. 600-601, author Tha Deshraj), Utterance of Jats, pages 326-327, author Yogendrapal Shastri.

 

There are 12 villages in Sonipat in Haryana of Takshak Jats, in which Rathdhana, Bayampur, Harsana, Libaspur, Kalupur, Lolhada, Jatheda etc. are prominent. The Takshak of Dehli is called Jat Tokas, who escaped from Khandavadah and settled here. Their Munirka Mohammadpur, Humayumpur, Hauz Khas etc. are special rich villages. In Bikaner, 15 villages belong to the Tanks . Bhagi village in Dadri tehsil in district Bhiwani Takshak is of Jats.

 

These people are in many villages of Jalandhar district of Punjab which are Sikhdharmis. These people in pakistan

 

History: Jat Samaj Patrika :

According to the book of Bhat Granth, the dynasty of Tokas Jats - Chandra dynasty, Kul- Yadukul, Mool Gotra- Atri, Branch-Tokas, Fort-Tahn Garh (Rajasthan), Takht (main place) - Mathurapuri, Scar-yellow, Horse-currency, Kul Devi - Yogeshwari, Deity - Krishna, Mantra - Panchakshari, Pujan and Arms-Talwar, Nadi-Yamuna, Ved-Yajurved, Upved-Dhanurved, Vriksh-Kadamb, Exhalation - Tank from Toda and the first is Padava Rawaladi (Haryana).

 

Charkhi Dadri near Ravldi Ran / Bagwati name of Leo Behror was married. In Bahrod, the people of the majority of the society used to harass Bhaga. Bhaga summoned his brother Raja Udai Singh Tokas and Raja Ruddh Singh Tokas from Rawaladi. They defeated the society that had harassed the majority. A separate village was established in the name of Bhaga . Which is famous today as Bhangi Bahrod.

 

The deceases offspring to protect his sister ran people ran lived. Since then, the village of Bhakso was populated in village Bhagi.

 

After some time, the wives of Chaudhary Udai Singh and Chaudhary Rudh Singh said that your sister is now safe and living happily. So now we should leave the sister's house. Leaving some men near the sister, they left. They were going on the road that their vehicle broke. They stayed there

 

According to Pandit Chandrabhan Vaidya (Bhatt), when asked by the younger queen (wife of Rudh Singh) to move the Jeth ji a little further, Raja Uday Singh accepted this as a taunt and went to Pilibhit. Asked from there to ask the little queen if I should go further. In this way Raja Udai Singh settled in Pilibhit.

 

Ruddha Singh remained alone. Settled in Naharpur from there . Due to the poor land there, Baburpur settled, which is called Harding Bridge. Walking from here, Ruddha Singh Tokas permanently settled in Munirka. According to the Bhatt Granth, Vikrami Samvat 1503, 1446 Varkha Sawan Sudi on the ninth day, on Monday, Rudh Singh settled the village of Munirka. Ruddha Singh Tokas had a business of cow, buffalo milk. And they also used to do milk business from Pathan named Manir Khan. Manir Khan Pathan was the debtor of Ruddh Singh. He could not get the loan Therefore, Manir Khan gave all the three strips of Veerpur, Raipur, Ujirpur to Rudh Singh. In this way he became the owner of this manor. King Jagir Mubarak Shah to Manir KhanHad given in the reward.

 

At that time, the land of Munirka village was 7000 bighas. In which today R. K. Puram, J. Un. U, D.D.A. Flat, Basant Kunj, Basant Bihar are inhabited. In the year 1675 Vikram Samvat 1732, Rupa Ram / Ratia Singh Tokas, descendant of Ruddha Singh, moved to Humayumpur village from Munirka and after that in 1715 Vikram Samvat 1772 from Tula Ram Tokas Munirka to Mohammadpur village.

 

Today there are 200 families of Tokas dynasty in Munirka village whose population is between 20 and 25 thousand . Munirka village, situated in the region of Aravalli mountain, is situated amidst natural drains. Earlier there used to be rugged forests here. In Munirka village, there is an ancient temple of Munir Baba Gangnathji, the presiding deity of the village, associated with Siddha Machendra Yeti Guru Gorakh Nath Siddha Baba. Baba Gangnath ji had taken life for a long time here after doing penance. The mausoleum of Baba Gangnathji, his magnificent temple and his Dhuni is still the heart of the village. There is an ancient grand pond near the temple.

 

Taxak khap :

Taxak khap has 12 villages in Haryana in Sonipat district. Main The Villages Are: Rathdhana (Rathdna), Baiyapur (Bayapur), Harsana (Hrsana), Libaspur (Libaspur), Kalupur (Kalupur). 15 villages of this khap are in Bikaner janpad and 4 villages in Delhi, one village Bhagvi (Bhagi) in Bhiwani district in Haryana.

 

Source :

 

https://www.jatland.com/
home/Taxak