PALEOLITHIC
Hunting
a glyptodon. Glyptodons were hunted to extinction within two millennia
after humans' arrival in South America
Cave
of Altamira and Paleolithic Cave Art of Northern Spain
The
Paleolithic :
Pliocene (before Homo)
Lower Paleolithic : c. 3.3 Ma – 300 ka
Middle Paleolithic : c. 300 – 50 ka
Upper Paleolithic : c. 50 – 10 ka
The
Paleolithic or Palaeolithic or Palæolithic, also called the
Old Stone Age, is a period in human prehistory distinguished by
the original development of stone tools that covers c. 99% of the
time period of human technological prehistory. It extends from the
earliest known use of stone tools by hominins c. 3.3 million years
ago, to the end of the Pleistocene c. 11,650 cal BP.
The
Paleolithic Age in Europe preceded the Mesolithic Age, although
the date of the transition varies geographically by several thousand
years. During the Paleolithic Age, hominins grouped together in
small societies such as bands and subsisted by gathering plants,
fishing, and hunting or scavenging wild animals. The Paleolithic
Age is characterized by the use of knapped stone tools, although
at the time humans also used wood and bone tools. Other organic
commodities were adapted for use as tools, including leather and
vegetable fibers; however, due to rapid decomposition, these have
not survived to any great degree.
About
50,000 years ago a marked increase in the diversity of artifacts
occurred. In Africa, bone artifacts and the first art appear in
the archaeological record. The first evidence of human fishing is
also noted, from artifacts in places such as Blombos cave in South
Africa. Archaeologists classify artifacts of the last 50,000 years
into many different categories, such as projectile points, engraving
tools, knife blades, and drilling and piercing tools.
Humankind
gradually evolved from early members of the genus Homo—such
as Homo habilis, who used simple stone tools—into anatomically
modern humans as well as behaviourally modern humans by the Upper
Paleolithic. During the end of the Paleolithic Age, specifically
the Middle or Upper Paleolithic Age, humans began to produce the
earliest works of art and to engage in religious or spiritual behavior
such as burial and ritual. [page needed] [need quotation to verify]
Conditions during the Paleolithic Age went through a set of glacial
and interglacial periods in which the climate periodically fluctuated
between warm and cool temperatures. Archaeological and genetic data
suggest that the source populations of Paleolithic humans survived
in sparsely-wooded areas and dispersed through areas of high primary
productivity while avoiding dense forest-cover.
By
c. 50,000 – c. 40,000 BP, the first humans set foot in Australia.
By c. 45,000 BP, humans lived at 61°N latitude in Europe. By
c. 30,000 BP, Japan was reached, and by c. 27,000 BP humans were
present in Siberia, above the Arctic Circle. At the end of the Upper
Paleolithic Age a group of humans crossed Beringia and quickly expanded
throughout the Americas.
Etymology
:
The term "Palaeolithic" was coined by archaeologist John
Lubbock in 1865. It derives from Greek, palaios, "old"
and lithos, "stone", meaning "old age of the stone"
or "Old Stone Age".
Paleogeography
and climate :
This
skull, of early Homo neanderthalensis, Miguelón from the
Lower Paleolithic dated to 430,000 bp
Temperature
rise marking the end of Paleolithic, as derived from ice core data
The Paleolithic coincides almost exactly with the Pleistocene epoch
of geologic time, which lasted from 2.6 million years ago to about
12,000 years ago. This epoch experienced important geographic and
climatic changes that affected human societies.
During
the preceding Pliocene, continents had continued to drift from possibly
as far as 250 km (160 mi) from their present locations to positions
only 70 km (43 mi) from their current location. South America became
linked to North America through the Isthmus of Panama, bringing
a nearly complete end to South America's distinctive marsupial fauna.
The formation of the isthmus had major consequences on global temperatures,
because warm equatorial ocean currents were cut off, and the cold
Arctic and Antarctic waters lowered temperatures in the now-isolated
Atlantic Ocean.
Most
of Central America formed during the Pliocene to connect the continents
of North and South America, allowing fauna from these continents
to leave their native habitats and colonize new areas. Africa's
collision with Asia created the Mediterranean, cutting off the remnants
of the Tethys Ocean. During the Pleistocene, the modern continents
were essentially at their present positions; the tectonic plates
on which they sit have probably moved at most 100 km (62 mi) from
each other since the beginning of the period.
Climates
during the Pliocene became cooler and drier, and seasonal, similar
to modern climates. Ice sheets grew on Antarctica. The formation
of an Arctic ice cap around 3 million years ago is signaled by an
abrupt shift in oxygen isotope ratios and ice-rafted cobbles in
the North Atlantic and North Pacific Ocean beds. Mid-latitude glaciation
probably began before the end of the epoch. The global cooling that
occurred during the Pliocene may have spurred on the disappearance
of forests and the spread of grasslands and savannas. The Pleistocene
climate was characterized by repeated glacial cycles during which
continental glaciers pushed to the 40th parallel in some places.
Four major glacial events have been identified, as well as many
minor intervening events. A major event is a general glacial excursion,
termed a "glacial". Glacials are separated by "interglacials".
During a glacial, the glacier experiences minor advances and retreats.
The minor excursion is a "stadial"; times between stadials
are "interstadials". Each glacial advance tied up huge
volumes of water in continental ice sheets 1,500–3,000 m (4,900–9,800
ft) deep, resulting in temporary sea level drops of 100 m (330 ft)
or more over the entire surface of the Earth. During interglacial
times, such as at present, drowned coastlines were common, mitigated
by isostatic or other emergent motion of some regions.
Many great mammals such as woolly mammoths, woolly rhinoceroses,
and cave lions inhabited the mammoth steppe during the Pleistocene
The effects of glaciation were global. Antarctica was ice-bound
throughout the Pleistocene and the preceding Pliocene. The Andes
were covered in the south by the Patagonian ice cap. There were
glaciers in New Zealand and Tasmania. The now decaying glaciers
of Mount Kenya, Mount Kilimanjaro, and the Ruwenzori Range in east
and central Africa were larger. Glaciers existed in the mountains
of Ethiopia and to the west in the Atlas mountains. In the northern
hemisphere, many glaciers fused into one. The Cordilleran Ice Sheet
covered the North American northwest; the Laurentide covered the
east. The Fenno-Scandian ice sheet covered northern Europe, including
Great Britain; the Alpine ice sheet covered the Alps. Scattered
domes stretched across Siberia and the Arctic shelf. The northern
seas were frozen. During the late Upper Paleolithic (Latest Pleistocene)
c. 18,000 BP, the Beringia land bridge between Asia and North America
was blocked by ice, which may have prevented early Paleo-Indians
such as the Clovis culture from directly crossing Beringia to reach
the Americas.
According
to Mark Lynas (through collected data), the Pleistocene's overall
climate could be characterized as a continuous El Niño with
trade winds in the south Pacific weakening or heading east, warm
air rising near Peru, warm water spreading from the west Pacific
and the Indian Ocean to the east Pacific, and other El Niño
markers.
The
Paleolithic is often held to finish at the end of the ice age (the
end of the Pleistocene epoch), and Earth's climate became warmer.
This may have caused or contributed to the extinction of the Pleistocene
megafauna, although it is also possible that the late Pleistocene
extinctions were (at least in part) caused by other factors such
as disease and overhunting by humans. New research suggests that
the extinction of the woolly mammoth may have been caused by the
combined effect of climatic change and human hunting. Scientists
suggest that climate change during the end of the Pleistocene caused
the mammoths' habitat to shrink in size, resulting in a drop in
population. The small populations were then hunted out by Paleolithic
humans. The global warming that occurred during the end of the Pleistocene
and the beginning of the Holocene may have made it easier for humans
to reach mammoth habitats that were previously frozen and inaccessible.
Small populations of woolly mammoths survived on isolated Arctic
islands, Saint Paul Island and Wrangel Island, until c. 3700 BP
and c. 1700 BP respectively. The Wrangel Island population became
extinct around the same time the island was settled by prehistoric
humans. There is no evidence of prehistoric human presence on Saint
Paul island (though early human settlements dating as far back as
6500 BP were found on the nearby Aleutian Islands).
Currently
agreed upon classifications as Paleolithic geoclimatic episodes
:
Age
(before) |
Particulars |
10,000
years |
America
: Flandrian interglacial
Atlantic
Europe : Flandriense
Maghreb
: Mellahiense
Mediterranean
Europe : Versiliense
Central
Europe : Flandrian interglacial |
80,000
years |
America
: Wisconsin
Atlantic
Europe : Devensiense
Maghreb
: Regresión
Mediterranean
Europe : Regresión
Central
Europe : Wisconsin Stage |
140,000
years |
America
: Sangamoniense
Atlantic
Europe : Ipswichiense
Maghreb
: Ouljiense
Mediterranean
Europe : Tirreniense II y III
Central
Europe : Eemian Stage |
200,000
years |
America
: Illinois
Atlantic
Europe : Wolstoniense
Maghreb
: Regresión
Mediterranean
Europe : Regresión
Central
Europe : Wolstonian Stage |
450,000
years |
America
: Yarmouthiense
Atlantic
Europe : Hoxniense
Maghreb
: Anfatiense
Mediterranean
Europe : Tirreniense I
Central
Europe : Hoxnian Stage |
580,000
years |
America
: Kansas
Atlantic
Europe : Angliense
Maghreb
: Regresión
Mediterranean
Europe : Regresión
Central
Europe : Kansan Stage |
750,000
years |
America
: Aftoniense
Atlantic
Europe : Cromeriense
Maghreb
: Maarifiense
Mediterranean
Europe : Siciliense
Central
Europe : Cromerian Complex |
1,100,000
years |
America
: Nebraska
Atlantic
Europe : Beestoniense
Maghreb
: Regresión
Mediterranean
Europe : Regresión
Central
Europe : Beestonian stage |
1,400,000
years |
America
: Interglaciar
Atlantic
Europe : Ludhamiense
Maghreb
: Messaudiense
Mediterranean
Europe : Calabriense
Central
Europe : Donau-Günz
|
Human way of life :
An
artist's rendering of a temporary wood house, based on evidence
found at Terra Amata (in Nice, France) and dated to the Lower Paleolithic
(c. 400,000 BP)
Nearly all of our knowledge of Paleolithic human culture and way
of life comes from archaeology and ethnographic comparisons to modern
hunter-gatherer cultures such as the !Kung San who live similarly
to their Paleolithic predecessors. The economy of a typical Paleolithic
society was a hunter-gatherer economy. Humans hunted wild animals
for meat and gathered food, firewood, and materials for their tools,
clothes, or shelters.
Human
population density was very low, around only one person per square
mile. This was most likely due to low body fat, infanticide, women
regularly engaging in intense endurance exercise, late weaning of
infants, and a nomadic lifestyle. Like contemporary hunter-gatherers,
Paleolithic humans enjoyed an abundance of leisure time unparalleled
in both Neolithic farming societies and modern industrial societies.
At the end of the Paleolithic, specifically the Middle or Upper
Paleolithic, humans began to produce works of art such as cave paintings,
rock art and jewellery and began to engage in religious behavior
such as burial and ritual.
Distribution
:
At the beginning of the Paleolithic, hominins were found primarily
in eastern Africa, east of the Great Rift Valley. Most known hominin
fossils dating earlier than one million years before present are
found in this area, particularly in Kenya, Tanzania, and Ethiopia.
By
c. 2,000,000 – c. 1,500,000 BP, groups of hominins began leaving
Africa and settling southern Europe and Asia. Southern Caucasus
was occupied by c. 1,700,000 BP, and northern China was reached
by c. 1,660,000 BP. By the end of the Lower Paleolithic, members
of the hominin family were living in what is now China, western
Indonesia, and, in Europe, around the Mediterranean and as far north
as England, France, southern Germany, and Bulgaria. Their further
northward expansion may have been limited by the lack of control
of fire: studies of cave settlements in Europe indicate no regular
use of fire prior to c. 400,000 – c. 300,000 BP.
East
Asian fossils from this period are typically placed in the genus
Homo erectus. Very little fossil evidence is available at known
Lower Paleolithic sites in Europe, but it is believed that hominins
who inhabited these sites were likewise Homo erectus. There is no
evidence of hominins in America, Australia, or almost anywhere in
Oceania during this time period.
Fates
of these early colonists, and their relationships to modern humans,
are still subject to debate. According to current archaeological
and genetic models, there were at least two notable expansion events
subsequent to peopling of Eurasia c. 2,000,000 – c. 1,500,000
BP. Around 500,000 BP a group of early humans, frequently called
Homo heidelbergensis, came to Europe from Africa and eventually
evolved into Homo neanderthalensis (Neanderthals). In the Middle
Paleolithic, Neanderthals were present in the region now occupied
by Poland.
Both
Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis became extinct by the end
of the Paleolithic. Descended from Homo sapiens, the anatomically
modern Homo sapiens sapiens emerged in eastern Africa c. 200,000
BP, left Africa around 50,000 BP, and expanded throughout the planet.
Multiple hominid groups coexisted for some time in certain locations.
Homo neanderthalensis were still found in parts of Eurasia c. 30,000
BP years, and engaged in an unknown degree of interbreeding with
Homo sapiens sapiens. DNA studies also suggest an unknown degree
of interbreeding between Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens denisova.
Hominin
fossils not belonging either to Homo neanderthalensis or to Homo
sapiens species, found in the Altai Mountains and Indonesia, were
radiocarbon dated to c. 30,000 – c. 40,000 BP and c. 17,000
BP respectively.
For
the duration of the Paleolithic, human populations remained low,
especially outside the equatorial region. The entire population
of Europe between 16,000 and 11,000 BP likely averaged some 30,000
individuals, and between 40,000 and 16,000 BP, it was even lower
at 4,000–6,000 individuals. However, remains of thousands
of butchered animals and tools made by Palaeolithic humans were
found in Lapa do Picareiro (pt), a cave in Portugal, date back between
41,000 and 38,000 years ago.
Technology
:
Lower Paleolithic biface viewed from both its superior and
inferior surface
Stone ball from a set of Paleolithic bolas
Tools :
Paleolithic humans made tools of stone, bone, and wood. The early
paleolithic hominins, Australopithecus, were the first users of
stone tools. Excavations in Gona, Ethiopia have produced thousands
of artifacts, and through radioisotopic dating and magnetostratigraphy,
the sites can be firmly dated to 2.6 million years ago. Evidence
shows these early hominins intentionally selected raw materials
with good flaking qualities and chose appropriate sized stones for
their needs to produce sharp-edged tools for cutting.
The
earliest Paleolithic stone tool industry, the Oldowan, began around
2.6 million years ago. It contained tools such as choppers, burins,
and stitching awls. It was completely replaced around 250,000 years
ago by the more complex Acheulean industry, which was first conceived
by Homo ergaster around 1.8–1.65 million years ago. The Acheulean
implements completely vanish from the archaeological record around
100,000 years ago and were replaced by more complex Middle Paleolithic
tool kits such as the Mousterian and the Aterian industries.
Lower
Paleolithic humans used a variety of stone tools, including hand
axes and choppers. Although they appear to have used hand axes often,
there is disagreement about their use. Interpretations range from
cutting and chopping tools, to digging implements, to flaking cores,
to the use in traps, and as a purely ritual significance, perhaps
in courting behavior. William H. Calvin has suggested that some
hand axes could have served as "killer Frisbees" meant
to be thrown at a herd of animals at a waterhole so as to stun one
of them. There are no indications of hafting, and some artifacts
are far too large for that. Thus, a thrown hand axe would not usually
have penetrated deeply enough to cause very serious injuries. Nevertheless,
it could have been an effective weapon for defense against predators.
Choppers and scrapers were likely used for skinning and butchering
scavenged animals and sharp-ended sticks were often obtained for
digging up edible roots. Presumably, early humans used wooden spears
as early as 5 million years ago to hunt small animals, much as their
relatives, chimpanzees, have been observed to do in Senegal, Africa.
Lower Paleolithic humans constructed shelters, such as the possible
wood hut at Terra Amata.
Fire
use :
Fire was used by the Lower Paleolithic hominins Homo erectus and
Homo ergaster as early as 300,000 to 1.5 million years ago and possibly
even earlier by the early Lower Paleolithic (Oldowan) hominin Homo
habilis or by robust Australopithecines such as Paranthropus. However,
the use of fire only became common in the societies of the following
Middle Stone Age and Middle Paleolithic. Use of fire reduced mortality
rates and provided protection against predators. Early hominins
may have begun to cook their food as early as the Lower Paleolithic
(c. 1.9 million years ago) or at the latest in the early Middle
Paleolithic (c. 250,000 years ago). Some scientists have hypothesized
that hominins began cooking food to defrost frozen meat, which would
help ensure their survival in cold regions.
Raft
:
The Lower Paleolithic Homo erectus possibly invented rafts (c. 840,000
– c. 800,000 BP) to travel over large bodies of water, which
may have allowed a group of Homo erectus to reach the island of
Flores and evolve into the small hominin Homo floresiensis. However,
this hypothesis is disputed within the anthropological community.
The possible use of rafts during the Lower Paleolithic may indicate
that Lower Paleolithic hominins such as Homo erectus were more advanced
than previously believed, and may have even spoken an early form
of modern language. Supplementary evidence from Neanderthal and
modern human sites located around the Mediterranean Sea, such as
Coa de sa Multa (c. 300,000 BP), has also indicated that both Middle
and Upper Paleolithic humans used rafts to travel over large bodies
of water (i.e. the Mediterranean Sea) for the purpose of colonizing
other bodies of land.
Advanced
tools :
By around 200,000 BP, Middle Paleolithic stone tool manufacturing
spawned a tool making technique known as the prepared-core technique,
that was more elaborate than previous Acheulean techniques. This
technique increased efficiency by allowing the creation of more
controlled and consistent flakes. It allowed Middle Paleolithic
humans to create stone tipped spears, which were the earliest composite
tools, by hafting sharp, pointy stone flakes onto wooden shafts.
In addition to improving tool making methods, the Middle Paleolithic
also saw an improvement of the tools themselves that allowed access
to a wider variety and amount of food sources. For example, microliths
or small stone tools or points were invented around 70,000–65,000
BP and were essential to the invention of bows and spear throwers
in the following Upper Paleolithic.
Harpoons
were invented and used for the first time during the late Middle
Paleolithic (c. 90,000 BP); the invention of these devices brought
fish into the human diets, which provided a hedge against starvation
and a more abundant food supply. Thanks to their technology and
their advanced social structures, Paleolithic groups such as the
Neanderthals—who had a Middle Paleolithic level of technology—appear
to have hunted large game just as well as Upper Paleolithic modern
humans. and the Neanderthals in particular may have likewise hunted
with projectile weapons. Nonetheless, Neanderthal use of projectile
weapons in hunting occurred very rarely (or perhaps never) and the
Neanderthals hunted large game animals mostly by ambushing them
and attacking them with mêlée weapons such as thrusting
spears rather than attacking them from a distance with projectile
weapons.
Other
inventions :
During the Upper Paleolithic, further inventions were made, such
as the net c. 22,000 or c. 29,000 BP) bolas, the spear thrower (c.
30,000 BP), the bow and arrow (c. 25,000 or c. 30,000 BP) and the
oldest example of ceramic art, the Venus of Dolní Vestonice
(c. 29,000 – c. 25,000 BP). Kilu Cave at Buku island, Solomon
islands, demonstrates navigation of some 60 km of open ocean at
30,000 BCcal.
Early
dogs were domesticated, sometime between 30,000 and 14,000 BP, presumably
to aid in hunting. However, the earliest instances of successful
domestication of dogs may be much more ancient than this. Evidence
from canine DNA collected by Robert K. Wayne suggests that dogs
may have been first domesticated in the late Middle Paleolithic
around 100,000 BP or perhaps even earlier.
Archaeological
evidence from the Dordogne region of France demonstrates that members
of the European early Upper Paleolithic culture known as the Aurignacian
used calendars (c. 30,000 BP). This was a lunar calendar that was
used to document the phases of the moon. Genuine solar calendars
did not appear until the Neolithic. Upper Paleolithic cultures were
probably able to time the migration of game animals such as wild
horses and deer. This ability allowed humans to become efficient
hunters and to exploit a wide variety of game animals. Recent research
indicates that the Neanderthals timed their hunts and the migrations
of game animals long before the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic.
Social
organization :
Humans
may have taken part in long-distance trade between bands for rare
commodities and raw materials (such as stone needed for making tools)
as early as 120,000 years ago in Middle Paleolithic.
The social organization of the earliest Paleolithic (Lower Paleolithic)
societies remains largely unknown to scientists, though Lower Paleolithic
hominins such as Homo habilis and Homo erectus are likely to have
had more complex social structures than chimpanzee societies. Late
Oldowan/Early Acheulean humans such as Homo ergaster/Homo erectus
may have been the first people to invent central campsites or home
bases and incorporate them into their foraging and hunting strategies
like contemporary hunter-gatherers, possibly as early as 1.7 million
years ago; however, the earliest solid evidence for the existence
of home bases or central campsites (hearths and shelters) among
humans only dates back to 500,000 years ago.
Similarly,
scientists disagree whether Lower Paleolithic humans were largely
monogamous or polygynous. In particular, the Provisional model suggests
that bipedalism arose in pre-Paleolithic australopithecine societies
as an adaptation to monogamous lifestyles; however, other researchers
note that sexual dimorphism is more pronounced in Lower Paleolithic
humans such as Homo erectus than in modern humans, who are less
polygynous than other primates, which suggests that Lower Paleolithic
humans had a largely polygynous lifestyle, because species that
have the most pronounced sexual dimorphism tend more likely to be
polygynous.
Human
societies from the Paleolithic to the early Neolithic farming tribes
lived without states and organized governments. For most of the
Lower Paleolithic, human societies were possibly more hierarchical
than their Middle and Upper Paleolithic descendants, and probably
were not grouped into bands, though during the end of the Lower
Paleolithic, the latest populations of the hominin Homo erectus
may have begun living in small-scale (possibly egalitarian) bands
similar to both Middle and Upper Paleolithic societies and modern
hunter-gatherers.
Middle
Paleolithic societies, unlike Lower Paleolithic and early Neolithic
ones, consisted of bands that ranged from 20–30 or 25–100
members and were usually nomadic. These bands were formed by several
families. Bands sometimes joined together into larger "macrobands"
for activities such as acquiring mates and celebrations or where
resources were abundant. By the end of the Paleolithic era (c. 10,000
BP), people began to settle down into permanent locations, and began
to rely on agriculture for sustenance in many locations. Much evidence
exists that humans took part in long-distance trade between bands
for rare commodities (such as ochre, which was often used for religious
purposes such as ritual) and raw materials, as early as 120,000
years ago in Middle Paleolithic. Inter-band trade may have appeared
during the Middle Paleolithic because trade between bands would
have helped ensure their survival by allowing them to exchange resources
and commodities such as raw materials during times of relative scarcity
(i.e. famine, drought). Like in modern hunter-gatherer societies,
individuals in Paleolithic societies may have been subordinate to
the band as a whole. Both Neanderthals and modern humans took care
of the elderly members of their societies during the Middle and
Upper Paleolithic.
Some
sources claim that most Middle and Upper Paleolithic societies were
possibly fundamentally egalitarian and may have rarely or never
engaged in organized violence between groups (i.e. war). Some Upper
Paleolithic societies in resource-rich environments (such as societies
in Sungir, in what is now Russia) may have had more complex and
hierarchical organization (such as tribes with a pronounced hierarchy
and a somewhat formal division of labor) and may have engaged in
endemic warfare. Some argue that there was no formal leadership
during the Middle and Upper Paleolithic. Like contemporary egalitarian
hunter-gatherers such as the Mbuti pygmies, societies may have made
decisions by communal consensus decision making rather than by appointing
permanent rulers such as chiefs and monarchs. Nor was there a formal
division of labor during the Paleolithic. Each member of the group
was skilled at all tasks essential to survival, regardless of individual
abilities.
Theories
to explain the apparent egalitarianism have arisen, notably the
Marxist concept of primitive communism. Christopher Boehm (1999)
has hypothesized that egalitarianism may have evolved in Paleolithic
societies because of a need to distribute resources such as food
and meat equally to avoid famine and ensure a stable food supply.
Raymond C. Kelly speculates that the relative peacefulness of Middle
and Upper Paleolithic societies resulted from a low population density,
cooperative relationships between groups such as reciprocal exchange
of commodities and collaboration on hunting expeditions, and because
the invention of projectile weapons such as throwing spears provided
less incentive for war, because they increased the damage done to
the attacker and decreased the relative amount of territory attackers
could gain. However, other sources claim that most Paleolithic groups
may have been larger, more complex, sedentary and warlike than most
contemporary hunter-gatherer societies, due to occupying more resource-abundant
areas than most modern hunter-gatherers who have been pushed into
more marginal habitats by agricultural societies.
Anthropologists
have typically assumed that in Paleolithic societies, women were
responsible for gathering wild plants and firewood, and men were
responsible for hunting and scavenging dead animals. However, analogies
to existent hunter-gatherer societies such as the Hadza people and
the Aboriginal Australians suggest that the sexual division of labor
in the Paleolithic was relatively flexible. Men may have participated
in gathering plants, firewood and insects, and women may have procured
small game animals for consumption and assisted men in driving herds
of large game animals (such as woolly mammoths and deer) off cliffs.
Additionally, recent research by anthropologist and archaeologist
Steven Kuhn from the University of Arizona is argued to support
that this division of labor did not exist prior to the Upper Paleolithic
and was invented relatively recently in human pre-history. Sexual
division of labor may have been developed to allow humans to acquire
food and other resources more efficiently. Possibly there was approximate
parity between men and women during the Middle and Upper Paleolithic,
and that period may have been the most gender-equal time in human
history. Archaeological evidence from art and funerary rituals indicates
that a number of individual women enjoyed seemingly high status
in their communities, and it is likely that both sexes participated
in decision making. The earliest known Paleolithic shaman (c. 30,000
BP) was female. Jared Diamond suggests that the status of women
declined with the adoption of agriculture because women in farming
societies typically have more pregnancies and are expected to do
more demanding work than women in hunter-gatherer societies. Like
most contemporary hunter-gatherer societies, Paleolithic and the
Mesolithic groups probably followed mostly matrilineal and ambilineal
descent patterns; patrilineal descent patterns were probably rarer
than in the Neolithic.
Sculpture
and painting :
The
Venus of Willendorf is one of the most famous Venus figurines
Early
examples of artistic expression, such as the Venus of Tan-Tan and
the patterns found on elephant bones from Bilzingsleben in Thuringia,
may have been produced by Acheulean tool users such as Homo erectus
prior to the start of the Middle Paleolithic period. However, the
earliest undisputed evidence of art during the Paleolithic comes
from Middle Paleolithic/Middle Stone Age sites such as Blombos Cave–South
Africa–in the form of bracelets, beads, rock art, and ochre
used as body paint and perhaps in ritual. Undisputed evidence of
art only becomes common in the Upper Paleolithic.
Lower
Paleolithic Acheulean tool users, according to Robert G. Bednarik,
began to engage in symbolic behavior such as art around 850,000
BP. They decorated themselves with beads and collected exotic stones
for aesthetic, rather than utilitarian qualities. According to him,
traces of the pigment ochre from late Lower Paleolithic Acheulean
archaeological sites suggests that Acheulean societies, like later
Upper Paleolithic societies, collected and used ochre to create
rock art. Nevertheless, it is also possible that the ochre traces
found at Lower Paleolithic sites is naturally occurring.
Upper
Paleolithic humans produced works of art such as cave paintings,
Venus figurines, animal carvings, and rock paintings. Upper Paleolithic
art can be divided into two broad categories: figurative art such
as cave paintings that clearly depicts animals (or more rarely humans);
and nonfigurative, which consists of shapes and symbols. Cave paintings
have been interpreted in a number of ways by modern archaeologists.
The earliest explanation, by the prehistorian Abbe Breuil, interpreted
the paintings as a form of magic designed to ensure a successful
hunt. However, this hypothesis fails to explain the existence of
animals such as saber-toothed cats and lions, which were not hunted
for food, and the existence of half-human, half-animal beings in
cave paintings. The anthropologist David Lewis-Williams has suggested
that Paleolithic cave paintings were indications of shamanistic
practices, because the paintings of half-human, half-animal paintings
and the remoteness of the caves are reminiscent of modern hunter-gatherer
shamanistic practices. Symbol-like images are more common in Paleolithic
cave paintings than are depictions of animals or humans, and unique
symbolic patterns might have been trademarks that represent different
Upper Paleolithic ethnic groups. Venus figurines have evoked similar
controversy. Archaeologists and anthropologists have described the
figurines as representations of goddesses, pornographic imagery,
apotropaic amulets used for sympathetic magic, and even as self-portraits
of women themselves.
R.
Dale Guthrie has studied not only the most artistic and publicized
paintings, but also a variety of lower-quality art and figurines,
and he identifies a wide range of skill and ages among the artists.
He also points out that the main themes in the paintings and other
artifacts (powerful beasts, risky hunting scenes and the over-sexual
representation of women) are to be expected in the fantasies of
adolescent males during the Upper Paleolithic.
Bradshaw
rock paintings found in the north-west Kimberley region of Western
Australia
The "Venus" figurines have been theorized, not universally,
as representing a mother goddess; the abundance of such female imagery
has inspired the theory that religion and society in Paleolithic
(and later Neolithic) cultures were primarily interested in, and
may have been directed by, women. Adherents of the theory include
archaeologist Marija Gimbutas and feminist scholar Merlin Stone,
the author of the 1976 book When God Was a Woman. Other explanations
for the purpose of the figurines have been proposed, such as Catherine
McCoid and LeRoy McDermott's hypothesis that they were self-portraits
of woman artists and R.Dale Gutrie's hypothesis that served as "stone
age pornography".
Music
:
The origins of music during the Paleolithic are unknown. The earliest
forms of music probably did not use musical instruments other than
the human voice or natural objects such as rocks. This early music
would not have left an archaeological footprint. Music may have
developed from rhythmic sounds produced by daily chores, for example,
cracking open nuts with stones. Maintaining a rhythm while working
may have helped people to become more efficient at daily activities.
An alternative theory originally proposed by Charles Darwin explains
that music may have begun as a hominin mating strategy. Bird and
other animal species produce music such as calls to attract mates.
This hypothesis is generally less accepted than the previous hypothesis,
but nonetheless provides a possible alternative.
Upper
Paleolithic (and possibly Middle Paleolithic) humans used flute-like
bone pipes as musical instruments, and music may have played a large
role in the religious lives of Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherers.
As with modern hunter-gatherer societies, music may have been used
in ritual or to help induce trances. In particular, it appears that
animal skin drums may have been used in religious events by Upper
Paleolithic shamans, as shown by the remains of drum-like instruments
from some Upper Paleolithic graves of shamans and the ethnographic
record of contemporary hunter-gatherer shamanic and ritual practices.
Religion
and beliefs :
Picture
of a half-human, half-animal being in a Paleolithic cave painting
in Dordogne. France. Some archaeologists believe that cave paintings
of half-human, half-animal beings may be evidence for early shamanic
practices during the Paleolithic.
According to James B. Harrod humankind first developed religious
and spiritual beliefs during the Middle Paleolithic or Upper Paleolithic.
Controversial scholars of prehistoric religion and anthropology,
James Harrod and Vincent W. Fallio, have recently proposed that
religion and spirituality (and art) may have first arisen in Pre-Paleolithic
chimpanzees or Early Lower Paleolithic (Oldowan) societies. According
to Fallio, the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans experienced
altered states of consciousness and partook in ritual, and ritual
was used in their societies to strengthen social bonding and group
cohesion.
Middle
Paleolithic humans' use of burials at sites such as Krapina, Croatia
(c. 130,000 BP) and Qafzeh, Israel (c. 100,000 BP) have led some
anthropologists and archaeologists, such as Philip Lieberman, to
believe that Middle Paleolithic humans may have possessed a belief
in an afterlife and a "concern for the dead that transcends
daily life". Cut marks on Neanderthal bones from various sites,
such as Combe-Grenal and Abri Moula in France, suggest that the
Neanderthals—like some contemporary human cultures—may
have practiced ritual defleshing for (presumably) religious reasons.
According to recent archaeological findings from Homo heidelbergensis
sites in Atapuerca, humans may have begun burying their dead much
earlier, during the late Lower Paleolithic; but this theory is widely
questioned in the scientific community.
Likewise,
some scientists have proposed that Middle Paleolithic societies
such as Neanderthal societies may also have practiced the earliest
form of totemism or animal worship, in addition to their (presumably
religious) burial of the dead. In particular, Emil Bächler
suggested (based on archaeological evidence from Middle Paleolithic
caves) that a bear cult was widespread among Middle Paleolithic
Neanderthals. A claim that evidence was found for Middle Paleolithic
animal worship c. 70,000 BCE originates from the Tsodilo Hills in
the African Kalahari desert has been denied by the original investigators
of the site. Animal cults in the Upper Paleolithic, such as the
bear cult, may have had their origins in these hypothetical Middle
Paleolithic animal cults. Animal worship during the Upper Paleolithic
was intertwined with hunting rites. For instance, archaeological
evidence from art and bear remains reveals that the bear cult apparently
involved a type of sacrificial bear ceremonialism, in which a bear
was shot with arrows, finished off by a shot or thrust in the lungs,
and ritually worshipped near a clay bear statue covered by a bear
fur with the skull and the body of the bear buried separately. Barbara
Ehrenreich controversially theorizes that the sacrificial hunting
rites of the Upper Paleolithic (and by extension Paleolithic cooperative
big-game hunting) gave rise to war or warlike raiding during the
following Epipaleolithic and Mesolithic or late Upper Paleolithic.
The
existence of anthropomorphic images and half-human, half-animal
images in the Upper Paleolithic may further indicate that Upper
Paleolithic humans were the first people to believe in a pantheon
of gods or supernatural beings, though such images may instead indicate
shamanistic practices similar to those of contemporary tribal societies.
The earliest known undisputed burial of a shaman (and by extension
the earliest undisputed evidence of shamans and shamanic practices)
dates back to the early Upper Paleolithic era (c. 30,000 BP) in
what is now the Czech Republic. However, during the early Upper
Paleolithic it was probably more common for all members of the band
to participate equally and fully in religious ceremonies, in contrast
to the religious traditions of later periods when religious authorities
and part-time ritual specialists such as shamans, priests and medicine
men were relatively common and integral to religious life. Additionally,
it is also possible that Upper Paleolithic religions, like contemporary
and historical animistic and polytheistic religions, believed in
the existence of a single creator deity in addition to other supernatural
beings such as animistic spirits.
Religion
was possibly apotropaic; specifically, it may have involved sympathetic
magic. The Venus figurines, which are abundant in the Upper Paleolithic
archaeological record, provide an example of possible Paleolithic
sympathetic magic, as they may have been used for ensuring success
in hunting and to bring about fertility of the land and women. The
Upper Paleolithic Venus figurines have sometimes been explained
as depictions of an earth goddess similar to Gaia, or as representations
of a goddess who is the ruler or mother of the animals. James Harrod
has described them as representative of female (and male) shamanistic
spiritual transformation processes.
Diet
and nutrition :
People
may have first fermented grapes in animal skin pouches to create
wine during the Paleolithic age
Paleolithic hunting and gathering people ate varying proportions
of vegetables (including tubers and roots), fruit, seeds (including
nuts and wild grass seeds) and insects, meat, fish, and shellfish.
However, there is little direct evidence of the relative proportions
of plant and animal foods. Although the term "paleolithic diet",
without references to a specific timeframe or locale, is sometimes
used with an implication that most humans shared a certain diet
during the entire era, that is not entirely accurate. The Paleolithic
was an extended period of time, during which multiple technological
advances were made, many of which had impact on human dietary structure.
For example, humans probably did not possess the control of fire
until the Middle Paleolithic, or tools necessary to engage in extensive
fishing. [citation needed] On the other hand, both these technologies
are generally agreed to have been widely available to humans by
the end of the Paleolithic (consequently, allowing humans in some
regions of the planet to rely heavily on fishing and hunting). In
addition, the Paleolithic involved a substantial geographical expansion
of human populations. During the Lower Paleolithic, ancestors of
modern humans are thought to have been constrained to Africa east
of the Great Rift Valley. During the Middle and Upper Paleolithic,
humans greatly expanded their area of settlement, reaching ecosystems
as diverse as New Guinea and Alaska, and adapting their diets to
whatever local resources were available.
Another
view is that until the Upper Paleolithic, humans were frugivores
(fruit eaters) who supplemented their meals with carrion, eggs,
and small prey such as baby birds and mussels, and only on rare
occasions managed to kill and consume big game such as antelopes.
This view is supported by studies of higher apes, particularly chimpanzees.
Chimpanzees are the closest to humans genetically, sharing more
than 96% of their DNA code with humans, and their digestive tract
is functionally very similar to that of humans. Chimpanzees are
primarily frugivores, but they could and would consume and digest
animal flesh, given the opportunity. In general, their actual diet
in the wild is about 95% plant-based, with the remaining 5% filled
with insects, eggs, and baby animals. In some ecosystems, however,
chimpanzees are predatory, forming parties to hunt monkeys. Some
comparative studies of human and higher primate digestive tracts
do suggest that humans have evolved to obtain greater amounts of
calories from sources such as animal foods, allowing them to shrink
the size of the gastrointestinal tract relative to body mass and
to increase the brain mass instead.
Anthropologists
have diverse opinions about the proportions of plant and animal
foods consumed. Just as with still existing hunters and gatherers,
there were many varied "diets" in different groups, and
also varying through this vast amount of time. Some paleolithic
hunter-gatherers consumed a significant amount of meat and possibly
obtained most of their food from hunting, while others were believed
to have a primarily plant-based diet. Most, if not all, are believed
to have been opportunistic omnivores. One hypothesis is that carbohydrate
tubers (plant underground storage organs) may have been eaten in
high amounts by pre-agricultural humans. It is thought that the
Paleolithic diet included as much as 1.65–1.9 kg (3.6–4.2
lb) per day of fruit and vegetables. The relative proportions of
plant and animal foods in the diets of Paleolithic people often
varied between regions, with more meat being necessary in colder
regions (which weren't populated by anatomically modern humans until
c. 30,000 – c. 50,000 BP). It is generally agreed that many
modern hunting and fishing tools, such as fish hooks, nets, bows,
and poisons, weren't introduced until the Upper Paleolithic and
possibly even Neolithic. The only hunting tools widely available
to humans during any significant part of the Paleolithic were hand-held
spears and harpoons. There's evidence of Paleolithic people killing
and eating seals and elands as far as c. 100,000 BP. On the other
hand, buffalo bones found in African caves from the same period
are typically of very young or very old individuals, and there's
no evidence that pigs, elephants, or rhinos were hunted by humans
at the time.
Paleolithic
peoples suffered less famine and malnutrition than the Neolithic
farming tribes that followed them. This was partly because Paleolithic
hunter-gatherers accessed a wider variety of natural foods, which
allowed them a more nutritious diet and a decreased risk of famine.
Many of the famines experienced by Neolithic (and some modern) farmers
were caused or amplified by their dependence on a small number of
crops. It is thought that wild foods can have a significantly different
nutritional profile than cultivated foods. The greater amount of
meat obtained by hunting big game animals in Paleolithic diets than
Neolithic diets may have also allowed Paleolithic hunter-gatherers
to enjoy a more nutritious diet than Neolithic agriculturalists.
It has been argued that the shift from hunting and gathering to
agriculture resulted in an increasing focus on a limited variety
of foods, with meat likely taking a back seat to plants. It is also
unlikely that Paleolithic hunter-gatherers were affected by modern
diseases of affluence such as type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease,
and cerebrovascular disease, because they ate mostly lean meats
and plants and frequently engaged in intense physical activity,
and because the average lifespan was shorter than the age of common
onset of these conditions.
Large-seeded
legumes were part of the human diet long before the Neolithic Revolution,
as evident from archaeobotanical finds from the Mousterian layers
of Kebara Cave, in Israel.
There
is evidence suggesting that Paleolithic societies were gathering
wild cereals for food use at least as early as 30,000 years ago.
However, seeds—such as grains and beans—were rarely
eaten and never in large quantities on a daily basis. Recent archaeological
evidence also indicates that winemaking may have originated in the
Paleolithic, when early humans drank the juice of naturally fermented
wild grapes from animal-skin pouches. Paleolithic humans consumed
animal organ meats, including the livers, kidneys, and brains. Upper
Paleolithic cultures appear to have had significant knowledge about
plants and herbs and may have, albeit very rarely, practiced rudimentary
forms of horticulture. In particular, bananas and tubers may have
been cultivated as early as 25,000 BP in southeast Asia. Late Upper
Paleolithic societies also appear to have occasionally practiced
pastoralism and animal husbandry, presumably for dietary reasons.
For instance, some European late Upper Paleolithic cultures domesticated
and raised reindeer, presumably for their meat or milk, as early
as 14,000 BP. Humans also probably consumed hallucinogenic plants
during the Paleolithic. The Aboriginal Australians have been consuming
a variety of native animal and plant foods, called bushfood, for
an estimated 60,000 years, since the Middle Paleolithic.
Large
game animals such as deer were an important source of protein in
Middle and Upper Paleolithic diets
In February 2019, scientists reported evidence, based on isotope
studies, that at least some Neanderthals may have eaten meat. People
during the Middle Paleolithic, such as the Neanderthals and Middle
Paleolithic Homo sapiens in Africa, began to catch shellfish for
food as revealed by shellfish cooking in Neanderthal sites in Italy
about 110,000 years ago and in Middle Paleolithic Homo sapiens sites
at Pinnacle Point, Africa around 164,000 BP. Although fishing only
became common during the Upper Paleolithic, fish have been part
of human diets long before the dawn of the Upper Paleolithic and
have certainly been consumed by humans since at least the Middle
Paleolithic. For example, the Middle Paleolithic Homo sapiens in
the region now occupied by the Democratic Republic of the Congo
hunted large 6 ft (1.8 m)-long catfish with specialized barbed fishing
points as early as 90,000 years ago. The invention of fishing allowed
some Upper Paleolithic and later hunter-gatherer societies to become
sedentary or semi-nomadic, which altered their social structures.
Example societies are the Lepenski Vir as well as some contemporary
hunter-gatherers, such as the Tlingit.
In
some instances (at least the Tlingit), they developed social stratification,
slavery, and complex social structures such as chiefdoms.
Anthropologists
such as Tim White suggest that cannibalism was common in human societies
prior to the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic, based on the large
amount of “butchered human" bones found in Neanderthal
and other Lower/Middle Paleolithic sites. Cannibalism in the Lower
and Middle Paleolithic may have occurred because of food shortages.
However, it may have been for religious reasons, and would coincide
with the development of religious practices thought to have occurred
during the Upper Paleolithic. Nonetheless, it remains possible that
Paleolithic societies never practiced cannibalism, and that the
damage to recovered human bones was either the result of excarnation
or predation by carnivores such as saber-toothed cats, lions, and
hyenas.
A
modern-day diet known as the Paleolithic diet exists, based on restricting
consumption to the foods presumed to be available to anatomically
modern humans prior to the advent of settled agriculture.
Source
:
https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Paleolithic