EVOLUTION
OF ARYAN WORSHIP
Evolution
of Aryan Worship :
In reading the different Zoroastrian and Hindu texts, we are left
with the impression that the three different Aryan religions as
well as the relationship between them, evolved significantly over
time. They could have looked very different at different points
in history and also in different locations. The relationship between
them also changed from one of coexistence to irrevocable separation.
The
communities in which the religions were practiced could have been
exclusivist or pluralistic communities. Rulers of exclusivist communities
could be expected to acknowledge a single religion or even a single
deity within the deva or asura pantheon. Rulers of pluralistic communities
could be expected to be more ecumenical.
At
times the three religious groups coexisted while at other times
they competed violently.
Coexistence :
An example of a pluralistic, ecumenical accommodation of the asuras
and devas by specific communities is a c. 1400 BCE peace treaty
with the Hittites, the rulers of the Hurrian kingdom of Mitanni
invoked the asuras Varuna and Mitra, as well as the devas Indra
and the Nasatyas. Mitanni was located southwest of Lake Van, in
an area that is part of Southern Turkey and Northern Syria today.
In
the Rig Ved, we read that the initial relationship between the asuras
and deva was one of coexistence. This relationship would gradually
change to one of competition. Nevertheless, some asuras such as
Agni (fire) are invited by the deva chief Indra to becomes devas
(Rig Ved 10.124) and Agni is sometimes referred to as a deva. In
verse 5, Varuna, a principle asura, is also invited by Indra to
become a dev.
Cooperation
between the asuras and devas is not relegated to the earlier Hindu
scriptures, the Rig Veda. Stories of their cooperation can be found
in the later Puranas, such as the story of Mount Mandara. However,
their cooperation is short-lived. In the story, a catastrophic flood
befalls the earth submerging the treasured possessions of the devas
and asuras including the elixir of immortality, Amrita (cf. Avestan
Amertat, immortality). The peak of the lofty Mount Meru rose above
the flood and this is where the gods gathered and caucused on how
to retrieve the Amrita. They agreed to a plan proposed by the deva
Vishnu. Together, they uprooted the mountain Mandara and placed
it on the back of Kurma, the tortoise. The gods then coiled the
world serpent Vasuki around the mountain like a rope with the asuras
holding one end of the snake and the devas the other end. By coordinating
their actions, they used the snake coiled around the mountain to
rotate the mountain and thereby churn the cosmic ocean formed by
the flood. As the waters churned, the ocean turned to milk and then
to butter, revealing the lost elixir of immortality and other treasures.
The cooperation soon ended. According to the Bhagavata-Purana, as
soon as the Amrita was produced, the devas took possession of it,
and broke their promise to the asuras to give them half. As a consequence,
the asuras then tried to steal it from the devas. A struggle ensued
which the asuras lost and the devas consumed the nectar of immortality
all by themselves.
Devas and Asuras using the world serpent Vasuki and Mount
Mandara to churn the cosmic ocean
The
story marks the end of cooperation between the devs and asurs and
the start of a deep and irreconcilable schism between them. Their
relationship had deteriorated to the point that they were henceforth
bent on mutual destruction.
Schism Between Mazda-Asura and Deva Worshippers :
The story of the differences between the asuras and devas were of
course a reflection of the differences and the violent conflict
between the deva and asura worshippers. While, as we have mentioned,
the Hindu scriptures do not directly refer to Mazda worshippers,
the Zoroastrian and Persian texts talk about the conflict as one
between the deva and Mazda worshippers. We will therefore refer
to the conflict as between the deva and asura-Mazda worshippers.
Primordial Battles Between Mazda & Deva Worshippers :
According to the poet Ferdowsi's epic, the Shahnameh, at the dawn
of history the Mazda worshippers and the deva worshippers fought
two primordial battles. The battles took place during the reign
of the first Aryan king, Gaya Maretan (a name later shortened first
to Gayo-Mard and then Kayomars in the Shahnameh). The first battle
started when the deva worshippers led by Ahriman, attacked Gaya
Maretan's Mazda worshippers. During the battle, Ahriman's son killed
Gaya Maretan's son Siyamak, and the first battle resulted in the
defeat of Gaya Maretan's army by Ahriman's hordes. However, retribution
was to follow. After a bitter period of mourning, Gaya Maretan assembled
a large army led by his grandson Hushang. The Mazda worshippers
then attacked and defeated the deva worshippers in a second battle,
a defeat that resulted in a subjugation of the deva worshippers
by the Mazda worshippers.
Hushang slays a div - a scene from the Shahnameh
These initial battles were to characterize the relationship between
the deva and Mazda worshippers in subsequent millennia. Periodically,
one group would win dominance over the other. Nevertheless, until,
their separation into the nations of Iran and India, they did coexist,
possibly within a community or in adjacent communities.
The War of Religion :
If Gaya Maretan and his successors had asserted the dominance of
Mazda worshippers over the deva worshippers, that state of affairs
would change over time, and the deva worshippers would turn the
table and gradually assert their dominance.
This
change in dominance is recorded in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh. The Shahnameh's
chapter on King Vishtasp and Zarathushtra opens with the following
lines which we have adapted from James Atkinson's translation of
the Shahnameh:
I've
said preceding sovereigns worshipped God (Mazda)
By whom their crowns were given
To protect the people from oppressors.
God they served, acknowledging God's goodness -
For to God, the pure, unchangeable, the Holy One!
They owed their greatness and their earthly power.
But after times,
Worship of God gave way to idolatry and pagan faith,
And then Mazda's name was lost
In adoration of created things.
At
the time of Zarathushtra's birth, Mazda worship had lost ground
to deva worship, as had the virtues of honesty and not causing harm
to others. A young Zarathushtra, disgusted with the dishonesty,
violence, greed and lawlessness that surrounded him, resolved to
dedicate his life to changing this state of affairs. He preached
establishing an ethical order based on the old Mazdayasni faith
- one that would come to be known as the Mazdayasni Ahura-Tkaesha.
The
first royal patron of Zarathushtra's religion was King Vishtasp.
Ferdowsi's Shahnameh tells us that King Vishtasp was king of Balkh,
which at that time had become a tributary state of Turan (Sugd).
For a map that shows the location of these states, see Aryan Homeland
page.
When
King Vishtasp adopted the Zoroastrian Mazdayasni faith, he also
decided to stop paying tribute to King Arjasp of Turan, whereupon
Arjasp gave Vishtasp an ultimatum to resume paying tribute and forsake
his adopted faith, or face a devastating invasion (cf. Warner &
Atkinson translations of the Shahnameh) :
"Abandon
your ill course,
Be awed before the God of Paradise,
Put far from you that aging miscreant,
And hold a feast according to our customs... .
"If
not, in a month or two,
I will enter your kingdom with fire and sword,
And destroy your authority and you.
I give you good advice :
Do not be influenced by a wicked counsellor,
But return to your former religious practices.
Weigh well, therefore, what I say."
Vishtasp
rejected the ultimatum and what followed was the War of Religion
(cf. Greater Bundahishn 9.36 and Lesser Bundahishn 12.36) in which
Vishtasp was apparantly victorious (also see the last para of this
section).
The
conflict and Vishtasp's victory could have resulted in the deva
worshippers living in his Central Asian kingdom, leaving or being
pushed south through the Hindu Kush mountain passes into the upper
Indus valley (today's Pakistan). It is possible that the Indus valley
had previously been populated by deva worshippers, and that those
from Central Asia migrated to join their co-religionists. The Hindu
Kush (meaning Hindu Killer) would from that point, have formed a
border between the Zoroastrian Mazda worshippers and the deva worshippers.
The
Indus Valley was called Hindu (later Hind or Ind) in the Avesta.
The locals called the region Sindhu and then Sind. Replacing 'h'
with 's' is a common way of transforming many Avestan words to Sanskrit.
The Persians eventually called the people of the region Hindi, a
name that would in western parlance become Indie (India). Indians,
however, refer to their country as Bharat. In addition, the name
for the religion of the deva worshippers, Hindu, is also derived
from the Avestan / Iranian / Persian names for the Indus region.
Hindu is not a name for their religion used by the ancient Hindus.
Hindus refer to their religion by various names such as Sanatana
Dharma, meaning eternal law in Sanskrit, or the Vaideeha Dharma.
However,
the Greater Bundahishn also records in 9.36, "In the War of
Religion, when defeat was with the Iranians,... ." Such a defeat
could have pushed the Iranian out of their Central Asian homeland
westward. The Lesser Bundahishn in 12.32-33 states, "32. From
the same Padashkh-Vargar mountain unto Mount Kumish, which they
call Mount Madofryad ('Come-to-help') -- that in which Vishtasp
routed Arjasp -- is Mount Miyan-i-Dast ('mid-plain'), and was broken
off from that mountain there. 33. They say, in the War of the Religion,
when there was confusion among the Iranians it broke off from that
mountain, and slid down into the middle of the plain; the Iranians
were saved by it, and it was called 'Come-to-help' by them."
Asura Deva Conflict in the Hindu Scriptures :
The perpetual war between the asuras and devas form some of the
central themes in the later Hindu texts. This might signify that
at the time when these texts were written, the relationship between
the Aryan asura and deva worshippers had deteriorated to such an
extent that they engaged in continuous internecine conflict.
The
perpetual conflict between the devas and asura described in the
Hindu texts found its way into Buddhist literature as well. In Pali
Theravada Buddhist literature, the most frequent references to asuras
are in connection with the continual war between asuras and devas.
Similarly, in Mahayana Buddhist literature the asuras, motivated
by envy of the devas, are constantly at war with them. [111: 21-6].
Mahish-Asur & Durga-Devi :
Durga-devi killing Mahish-asura in the form of a buffalo
An example of the transformation in relations between the deva and
asura worshippers in Hindu scriptures from a grudging acknowledgement
of the onetime supremacy of the Mazda / asura worshippers to violent
conflict, is the Hindu myth of the battle between female dev, Durga-devi
and the asura, Mahish-asur in chapters 81 to 93 in the Markandeya
Puran.
[The
Vedic name Mahish-asura may have an Avestan equivalence in mazishta-ahura
i.e. the greatest ahura/asura. Mahish-asur could transform himself
into a buffalo and the scenes of Durga killing Mahish-asura sometimes
depicts Durga killing a buffalo, a scene reminiscent of Mitra killing
the bull in Roman mithraeums. (Curiously, Mithra in Iranian tradition
is the name of a woman.) Durga carries the title Mahish-asura-mardini,
mardini meaning a killer of the feminine gender.]
According
to the myth, Mahish-asur was pious and worshipped Brahma, the supreme
deity among the devas and asuras. As a reward, Brahma granted Mahish-asura
supremacy and omnipotence over all deities and humans - no man or
male deity would be able to defeat him or kill him. Mahish-asura
used his omnipotence over males to defeat Indra, the king of the
devas, and take control of Swarga Loka, Indra's realm in the upper
mountainous regions, and Prithvi Loka, the lower regions. In doing
so, Mahish-asur drove Indra and all the other devas (in other words,
the deva worshippers and temples housing the devas) out of Swarg
Lok.
This
description of Mahish-asura as an omnipotent god, a god who was
supreme over both devs and asurs, is a description shared only by
the Rig Vedic asura Varuna who is designated in the Rig Veda as
the asura who is king of everyone, both gods and mortals (RV II.27.10).
"This asura rules over the gods," is a further statement
of omnipotence in Atharva Veda I.10.1. No other Vedic god is described
in this manner. Asura Varuna is often thought to be the Vedic equivalent
of the Avestan Ahura Mazda.
Swarga
Loka, is the mountainous kingdom where Mount Meru stands. Mount
Meru and its companion mountains are the hub from which the Himalayas
stem (a possible description of the Pamirs). Bharatavarsha, Ancient
India, lay to the south of the Himalayas. The Vedic description
of Mount Meru is similar to the Zoroastrian description of Airyana
Vaeja's Mount Hara.
After
an eon-long lament by the expelled devas, Brahma created Durga,
a female deity who avenged the devas by killing Mahish-asura whose
omnipotence did not extend to females. The killing of Mahish-asura
and the defeat of his armies enabled the devas to return to Swarga
and Prithvi Loka.
The Deva and Mahish-asura armies meet in battle Berkley
Art Museum Artist unknown. Karnataka, India 1830-1845 CE. Ink, gouache,
and gold on paper
There
are indications in the myth, that while Mahish-asur was in the beginning
allied to other asuras, Mahish-asura eventually drove these asuras
out of Swarga Loka as well. (This could mean that Mahish-asura was
worshipped not just as a supreme God, but as an only God as well.)
When the devas prepared to invade and retake Swarga and Prithvi
Loka, the other asuras assisted Durga by providing her with weapons.
The
myth has embedded in it, the common roots and the schism between
the Aryan religious groups: the deva, asura and Mazda worshippers.
It may also contain history. For instance, at the outset there are
the common roots, shared history and co-existence among the groups.
Next, there is the rise to dominance of the Mazda worshippers who
drove the deva worshippers out of the upper and lower regions of
the Aryan homeland. Later, the Mazda worshippers drove out the asura
worshippers as well. Eventually, however, the deva worshippers,
assisted by the asura worshippers, assembled a strong army and drove
the Mazda worshippers out of Airyana Vaeja. The war of religion
between the two groups may have therefore taken place in two stages,
the second stage ending in the Mazda worshippers being driven out
of their traditional lands. The Bundahishn 12.33 states that "They
say, in the war of the religion, there was confusion among the Iranians...
."
There
is a inexplicable gap in Zoroastrian history this myth might help
to fill. The gap occurs after the closing of the Avestan canon and
the start of Median and Persian history (c. 800 BCE). Some reason
or event caused the Zoroastrians to migrate westward out of the
upper Aryan lands.
The
story is an example of how the schism between the two groups became
part of Hindu scripture. Similarly, an entire book of the Avesta,
the Vendidad, derives its name from Vi-dev-data, the law against
the devas, that is, the law against evil.
Post Separation Relations :
Once the two groups of Aryans had separated, the deva worshippers
migrating south across the Hindu Kush mountains into the upper Indus
valley, the relationship between the deva and Mazda worshippers
appears to have oscillated between peaceful neighbourliness and
conflict. However, when conflict did arise, it was more in the nature
of kings and ruling groups seeking power (sometimes perhaps at the
behest of religious advisors) than animosity between between two
peoples.
To
this day, the two peoples, the Zoroastrians and Hindus, intuitively
feel a certain historic kinship. When the Zoroastrians were driven
out of their Iranian homeland by the Arabs, it is the Hindus of
India who gave the Zoroastrians a home, and the two groups have
coexisted peacefully in India for over a thousand years, each honouring
the other's freedom to maintain their religious beliefs.
Zoroastrians
owe a debt of gratitude to their Hindu cousins for having opened
the doors of their land for Zoroastrians to enter not just as guests
but as members of a family. Even the Zoroastrians who remained behind
in Iran benefited from Indian hospitality since the Zoroastrians
(the Parsees) who prospered in India were able to provide support
and advocate on behalf of their Iranian brethren who were discriminated
against and persecuted in the land of their ancestors.
It
is on this note: the completion of a full cycle of relations between
the Aryan religious groups, that we end this chapter on Aryan heritage
- a heritage that started and ended in coexistence and cooperation.
Source
:
http://www.heritageinstitute.com/
zoroastrianism/aryans/religion2.htm