GOKTURKS
Göktürk
petroglyphs from Mongolia (6th to 8th century)
Total
population : Ancestral to some Turkic population
Regions with significant populations : Central
and Eastern Asia
Languages : Old Turkic and Middle Chinese
Religion : Tengrism
Related ethnic groups : Türgesh, Toquz Oghuz,
Xueyantuo and Shatuo
The
Göktürks, Celestial Turks or Blue Turks (Romanized: Türük
Bodun; Chinese: Tujué; Wade-Giles: T'u-chüeh) were a
nomadic confederation of Turkic peoples in medieval Inner Asia.
The Göktürks, under the leadership of Bumin Qaghan (d.
552) and his sons, succeeded the Rouran Khaganate as the main power
in the region and established the Turkic Khaganate, one of several
nomadic dynasties which would shape the future geolocation, culture,
and dominant beliefs of Turkic peoples.
Etymology
:
Strictly
speaking, the common name Göktürk is the Anatolian Turkish
form of the historical ethnic group's endonym: which was attested
as romanized: Türük Old Turkic: romanized: Kök Türük,
or romanized: Türk. They were known in Middle Chinese historical
sources as the Tujué. According to Chinese sources, Tujué
meant "combat helmet" (Chinese: pinyin: Doumóu;
Wade–Giles: Tou1-mou2), reportedly because the shape of the
Altai Mountains where they lived, was similar to a combat helmet.
Róna-Tas (1991) pointed to a Khotanese-Saka word, tturakä
"lid", semantically stretchable to "helmet",
as a possible source for this folk etymology, yet Golden thinks
this connection requires more data.
Göktürk
means "Celestial Turks", or sometimes "Blue Turks"
(i.e. because sky blue is associated with celestial realms). This
is consistent with "the cult of heavenly ordained rule"
which was a recurrent element of Altaic political culture and as
such may have been imbibed by the Göktürks from their
predecessors in Mongolia. The name of the ruling Ashina clan may
derive from the Khotanese Saka term for "deep blue", aššina.
The
ethnonym was also recorded in various other Middle Asian languages,
such as Sogdian *Türkit ~ Türküt, tr'wkt, trwkt,
turkt > trwkc, trukc; Khotanese Saka Tturka, Ttruka and Old Tibetan
Drugu.
The
ethnonym Türük/Törük, possibly means "created",
"born", from the Old Turkic word root *türi-/töri-
("tribal root, (mythic) ancestry; take shape, to be born, be
created, arise, spring up") and conjugated with Old Turkic
suffix (-ik), perhaps from Proto-Turkic *türi-k ("lineage,
ancestry"), (compare also Proto-Turkic root *töre- "to
be born, originate")
According
to American Heritage Dictionary the word Türk meant "strong"
in Old Turkic; though Gerhard Doerfer supports this theory, Gerard
Clauson points out that "the word türk is never used in
the generalized sense of 'strong'" and that the noun türk
originally meant "'the culminating point of maturity' (of a
fruit, human being, etc.), but more often used as an [adjective]
meaning (of a fruit) 'just fully ripe'; (of a human being) 'in the
prime of life, young, and vigorous'".
Origins
:
Kül Tigin
The Göktürk rulers originated from the Ashina clan, who
were first attested to 439. The Book of Sui reports that in that
year, on October 18, the Tuoba ruler Emperor Taiwu of Northern Wei
overthrew Juqu Mujian of the Northern Liang in eastern Gansu, whence
500 Ashina families fled northwest to the Rouran Khaganate in the
vicinity of Gaochang.
According
to the Book of Zhou and History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina
clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation, specifically,
the Northern Xiongnu tribes or southern Xiongnu "who settled
along the northern Chinese frontier", according to Pulleyblank.
However, this view is contested. Göktürks were also posited
as had originated from an obscure Suo state (MC: *sâk) which
was situated north of the Xiongnu and had been founded either by
Sakas or Xianbei. According to the Book of Sui and the Tongdian,
they were "mixed Hu (barbarians)" from Pingliang, now
in Gansu, Northwest China. Pointing to the Ashina's association
with the Northern tribes of the Xiongnu, some researchers (e.g.
Duan, Lung, etc.) proposed that Göktürks belonged in particular
to the Tiele confederation, likewise Xiongnu-associated, by ancestral
lineage.
Chinese
sources linked the Hu on their northern borders to the Xiongnu just
as Graeco-Roman historiographers called the Pannonian Avars, Huns
and Hungarians "Scythians". Such archaizing was a common
literary topos, implying similar geographic origins and nomadic
lifestyle but not direct filiation.[page needed]
As
part of the heterogeneous Rouran Khaganate, the Türks lived
for generations north of the Altai Mountains, where they 'engaged
in metal working for the Rouran'. According to Denis Sinor, the
rise to power of the Ashina clan represented an 'internal revolution'
in the Rouran Khaganate rather than an external conquest.
According
to Charles Holcombe, the early Turk population was rather heterogeneous
and many of the names of Türk rulers, including the two founding
members, are not even Turkic. This is supported by evidence from
the Orkhon inscriptions, which include several non-Turkic lexemes,
possibly representing Uralic or Yeniseian words. Peter Benjamin
Golden points out that the khaghans of the Turkic Khaganate, the
Ashina, who were of an undetermined ethnic origin, adopted Iranian
and Tokharian (or non-Altaic) titles, he also adds that this hypothesis
assumes that they were not themselves lranian or Tokharian in speech.
German Turkologist W.-E. Scharlipp points out that many common terms
in Turkic are Iranian in origin. Whatever language the Ashina may
have spoken originally, they and those they ruled would all speak
Turkic, in a variety of dialects, and create, in a broadly defined
sense, a common culture.
Expansion
:
The Göktürks reached their peak in late 6th century and
began to invade the Sui Dynasty of China. However, the war ended
due to the division of Turkic nobles and their civil war for the
throne of Khagan. With the support of Emperor Wen of Sui, Yami Qaghan
won the competition. However, the Göktürk empire was divided
to Eastern and Western empires. Weakened by the civil war, Yami
Qaghan declared allegiance to Sui Dynasty. When Sui began to decline,
Shibi Khagan began to assault its territory and even surrounded
Emperor Yang of Sui in Siege of Yanmen (615 AD) with 100,000 cavalry
troops. After the collapse of Sui dynasty, the Göktürks
intervened in the ensuing Chinese civil wars, providing support
to the northeastern rebel Liu Heita against the rising Tang in 622
and 623. Liu enjoyed a long string of success but was finally routed
by Li Shimin and other Tang generals and executed. The Tang dynasty
was then established.
Conquest
by the Tang :
Shoroon Bumbagar tomb mural, Göktürk, 7th century CE,
Mongolia
Göktürk
cavalry mural, Shoroon Bumbagar tomb, 7th century CE
Although Göktürk Khaganate once provided support to the
Tang Dynasty in the early period of Chinese civil war, the conflicts
between the Göktürks and Tang finally broke out when Tang
was gradually reuniting China. Göktürk began to attack
and raid the northern border of the Tang Empire and once marched
their main force to Chang'an, the capital of Tang. Having not recovered
from the civil war, the Tang briefly had to pay tribute to Göktürk
nobles. Allied with tribes against the Göktürk Khaganate,
the Tang defeated the main force of Göktürk army in Battle
of Yinshan four years later and captured Illig Qaghan in 630 AD.
With the submission of Turkic tribes, the Tang conquered the Mongolian
Plateau.
After
hard court debate, Emperor Taizong decided to pardon the Göktürk
nobles and offered them the positions of imperial guards. However,
the plan ended in an assassination plan of the emperor. On May 19,
639 Ashina Jiesheshuai and his tribesmen directly assaulted Emperor
Taizong of Tang at Jiucheng Palace (in present-day Linyou County,
Baoji, Shaanxi). However, they did not succeed and fled to the north,
but were caught by pursuers near the Wei River and were killed.
Ashina Hexiangu was exiled to Lingbiao. After the unsuccessful raid
of Ashina Jiesheshuai, on August 13, 639 Taizong installed Qilibi
Khan and ordered the settled Turkic people to follow him north of
the Yellow River to settle between the Great Wall of China and the
Gobi Desert. However, many Göktürk generals still remained
loyal in service to the Tang Empire.
In
679, Ashide Wenfu and Ashide Fengzhi, who were Turkic leaders of
the Chanyu Protectorate, declared Ashina Nishufu as qaghan and revolted
against the Tang dynasty. In 680, Pei Xingjian defeated Ashina Nishufu
and his army. Ashina Nishufu was killed by his men. Ashide Wenfu
made Ashina Funian a qaghan and again revolted against the Tang
dynasty. Ashide Wenfu and Ashina Funian surrendered to Pei Xingjian.
On December 5, 681 54 Göktürks including Ashide Wenfu
and Ashina Funian were publicly executed in the Eastern Market of
Chang'an. In 682, Ilterish Qaghan and Tonyukuk revolted and occupied
Heisha Castle (northwest of present-day Hohhot, Inner Mongolia)
with the remnants of Ashina Funian's men. The restored Göktürk
Khaganate intervened in the war between Tang and Khitan tribes.
However, after the death of Bilge Qaghan, Göktürk could
no longer subjugate other Turk tribes in grassland. In 744, allied
with Tang Dynasty, the Uyghur Khaganate defeated the last Göktürk
Khaganate and controlled the Mongolian Plateau.
Genetics :
A genetic study published in Nature in May 2018 examined the remains
of four elite Türk soldiers buried between ca. 300 AD and 700
AD. The extracted samples of Y-DNA belonged to haplogroup R1 (two
samples) and O. The extracted samples of mtDNA belonged to C41b,
A14, H2a and A15c. The examined Türks were found to have more
East Asian ancestry than the preceding Tian Shan Huns. Evidence
of European ancestry was also detected, suggesting ongoing contacts
with Europe. Succeeding Turkic states of Central Asia displayed
even higher levels of East Asian ancestry, indicating that the Turkification
of Central Asia was carried out by dominant minorities of East Asian
origin.
Source
:
https://en.wikipedia.org