IRANIAN
LANGUAGES
Countries
and areas where an Iranian language has official status or is spoken
by a majority
Ethnicity
: Iranian peoples
Geographic distribution : West Asia, Caucasus, Central
Asia, and South Asia
Linguistic classification : Indo-European, Indo-Iranian,
Iranian
Proto-language : Proto-Iranian
Subdivisions : Western, Avestan (Central), Eastern
ISO 639-2 / 5 : Ira
Linguasphere : 58= (phylozone)
Glottolog : Iran1269
The
Iranian or Iranic languages are a branch of the Indo-Iranian languages
in the Indo-European language family that are spoken natively by
the Iranian peoples.
The
Iranian languages are grouped in three stages: Old Iranian (until
400 BC), Middle Iranian (400 BC – 900 AD), and New Iranian
(since 900 AD). The two directly attested Old Iranian languages
are Old Persian (from the Achaemenid Empire) and Old Avestan (the
language of the Avesta). Of the Middle Iranian languages, the better
understood and recorded ones are Middle Persian (from the Sasanian
Empire), Parthian (from the Parthian Empire), and Bactrian (from
the Kushan and Hephthalite empires).
As
of 2008, there were an estimated 150–200 million native speakers
of the Iranian languages. Ethnologue estimates that there are 86
Iranian languages, the largest among them being Persian, Pashto,
Kurdish, and the Balochi languages.
Term
:
The term Iranian is applied to any language which descends from
the ancestral Proto-Iranian language.
Some
scholars such as John Perry prefer the term Iranic as the anthropological
name for the linguistic family and ethnic groups of this category
(many of which exist outside Iran), while Iranian for anything about
the country Iran. He uses the same analogue as in differentiating
German from Germanic or differentiating Turkish and Turkic.
This
use of the term for the Iranian language family was introduced in
1836 by Christian Lassen. Robert Needham Cust used the term Irano-Aryan
in 1878, and Orientalists such as George Abraham Grierson and Max
Müller contrasted Irano-Aryan (Iranian) and Indo-Aryan (Indic).
Some recent scholarship, primarily in German, has revived this convention.
The
Iranian languages are divided into the following branches :
•
The Western Iranian languages subdivided into:
• Southwestern, of which Persian is the
dominant member;
•
Northwestern, of which the Kurdish languages are the dominant
members.
•
The Eastern Iranian languages subdivided into:
•
Southeastern, of which Pashto is the dominant member;
•
Northeastern, by far the smallest branch, of which Ossetian is
the dominant member.
Proto-Iranian
:
Historical
distribution in 100 BC: shown are Sarmatia, Scythia, Bactria (Eastern
Iranian, in orange); and the Parthian Empire (Western Iranian, in
red)
The Iranian languages all descend from a common ancestor: Proto-Iranian
which itself evolved from Proto-Indo-Iranian. This ancestor language
is speculated to have origins in Central Asia, and the Andronovo
Culture is suggested as a candidate for the common Indo-Iranian
culture around 2000 BC.[citation needed]
It
was situated precisely in the western part of Central Asia that
borders present-day Russia (and present-day Kazakhstan). It was
in relative proximity to the other satem ethno-linguistic groups
of the Indo-European family, like Thracian, Balto-Slavic and others,
and to common Indo-European's original homeland (more precisely,
the Eurasian Steppe to the north of the Caucasus), according to
the reconstructed linguistic relationships of common Indo-European.
Proto-Iranian
thus dates to some time after Proto-Indo-Iranian break-up, or the
early second millennium BCE, as the Old Iranian languages began
to break off and evolve separately as the various Iranian tribes
migrated and settled in vast areas of southeastern Europe, the Iranian
plateau, and Central Asia.
Proto-Iranian
innovations compared to Proto-Indo-Iranian include: the turning
of sibilant fricative *s into non-sibilant fricative glottal *h;
the voiced aspirated plosives *bh, *dh, *gh yielding to the voiced
unaspirated plosives *b, *d, *g resp.; the voiceless unaspirated
stops *p, *t, *k before another consonant changing into fricatives
*f, *0, *x resp.; voiceless aspirated stops *ph, *th, *kh turning
into fricatives *f, *0, *x, resp.
Old
Iranian :
The multitude of Middle Iranian languages and peoples indicate that
great linguistic diversity must have existed among the ancient speakers
of Iranian languages. Of that variety of languages/dialects, direct
evidence of only two have survived. These are:
•
Avestan, the two languages/dialects of the Avesta, i.e. the liturgical
texts of Zoroastrianism.
• Old Persian, the native language of a south-western
Iranian people known as Persians.
Indirectly attested Old Iranian languages are discussed below.
Old
Persian was an Old Iranian dialect as it was spoken in southwestern
Iran (the modern-day province of Fars) by the inhabitants of Parsa,
Persia or Persis who also gave their name to their region and language.
Genuine Old Persian is best attested in one of the three languages
of the Behistun inscription, composed circa 520 BC, and which is
the last inscription (and only inscription of significant length)
in which Old Persian is still grammatically correct. Later inscriptions
are comparatively brief, and typically simply copies of words and
phrases from earlier ones, often with grammatical errors, which
suggests that by the 4th century BC the transition from Old Persian
to Middle Persian was already far advanced, but efforts were still
being made to retain an "old" quality for official proclamations.
The
other directly attested Old Iranian dialects are the two forms of
Avestan, which take their name from their use in the Avesta, the
liturgical texts of indigenous Iranian religion that now goes by
the name of Zoroastrianism but in the Avesta itself is simply known
as vohu daena (later: behdin). The language of the Avesta is subdivided
into two dialects, conventionally known as "Old (or 'Gathic')
Avestan", and "Younger Avestan". These terms, which
date to the 19th century, are slightly misleading since 'Younger
Avestan' is not only much younger than 'Old Avestan', but also from
a different geographic region. The Old Avestan dialect is very archaic,
and at roughly the same stage of development as Rigvedic Sanskrit.
On the other hand, Younger Avestan is at about the same linguistic
stage as Old Persian, but by virtue of its use as a sacred language
retained its "old" characteristics long after the Old
Iranian languages had yielded to their Middle Iranian stage. Unlike
Old Persian, which has Middle Persian as its known successor, Avestan
has no clearly identifiable Middle Iranian stage (the effect of
Middle Iranian is indistinguishable from effects due to other causes).
In
addition to Old Persian and Avestan, which are the only directly
attested Old Iranian languages, all Middle Iranian languages must
have had a predecessor "Old Iranian" form of that language,
and thus can all be said to have had an (at least hypothetical)
"Old" form. Such hypothetical Old Iranian languages include
Carduchian (the hypothetical predecessor to Kurdish) and Old Parthian.
Additionally, the existence of unattested languages can sometimes
be inferred from the impact they had on neighbouring languages.
Such transfer is known to have occurred for Old Persian, which has
(what is called) a "Median" substrate in some of its vocabulary.
Also, foreign references to languages can also provide a hint to
the existence of otherwise unattested languages, for example through
toponyms/ethnonyms or in the recording of vocabulary, as Herodotus
did for what he called "Scythian".
Isoglosses
:
Conventionally, Iranian languages are grouped in "western"
and "eastern" branches. These terms have little meaning
with respect to Old Avestan as that stage of the language may predate
the settling of the Iranian peoples into western and eastern groups.
The geographic terms also have little meaning when applied to Younger
Avestan since it isn't known where that dialect (or dialects) was
spoken either. Certain is only that Avestan (all forms) and Old
Persian are distinct, and since Old Persian is "western",
and Avestan was not Old Persian, Avestan acquired a default assignment
to "eastern". Confusing the issue is the introduction
of a western Iranian substrate in later Avestan compositions and
redactions undertaken at the centers of imperial power in western
Iran (either in the south-west in Persia, or in the north-west in
Nisa/Parthia and Ecbatana/Media).
Two
of the earliest dialectal divisions among Iranian indeed happen
to not follow the later division into Western and Eastern blocks.
These concern the fate of the Proto-Indo-Iranian first-series palatal
consonants, *c and *dz:
•
Avestan and most other Iranian languages have deaffricated and depalatalized
these consonants, and have *c > s, *dz > z.
• Old Persian, however, has fronted these
consonants further: *c > 0, *dz > *ð > d.
As a common intermediate stage, it is possible to reconstruct depalatalized
affricates: *c, *dz. (This coincides with the state of affairs in
the neighboring Nuristani languages.) A further complication however
concerns the consonant clusters *cw and *dzw:
•
Avestan and most other Iranian languages have shifted these clusters
to sp, zb.
• In Old Persian, these clusters yield s, z, with
loss of the glide *w, but without further fronting.
• The Saka language, attested in the Middle Iranian
period, and its modern relative Wakhi fail to fit into either group:
in these, palatalization remains, and similar glide loss as in Old
Persian occurs: *cw > š, *dzw > .
A division of Iranian languages in at least three groups during
the Old Iranian period is thus implied :
•
Persid (Old Persian and its descendants)
• Sakan (Saka, Wakhi, and their Old Iranian ancestor)
• Central Iranian (all other Iranian languages)
It is possible that other distinct dialect groups were already in
existence during this period. Good candidates are the hypothetical
ancestor languages of Alanian/Scytho-Sarmatian subgroup of Scythian
in the far northwest; and the hypothetical "Old Parthian"
(the Old Iranian ancestor of Parthian) in the near northwest, where
original *dw > *b (paralleling the development of *cw).
Middle
Iranian languages :
What is known in Iranian linguistic history as the "Middle
Iranian" era is thought to begin around the 4th century BCE
lasting through the 9th century. Linguistically the Middle Iranian
languages are conventionally classified into two main groups, Western
and Eastern.
The
Western family includes Parthian (Arsacid Pahlavi) and Middle Persian,
while Bactrian, Sogdian, Khwarezmian, Saka, and Old Ossetic (Scytho-Sarmatian)
fall under the Eastern category. The two languages of the Western
group were linguistically very close to each other, but quite distinct
from their eastern counterparts. On the other hand, the Eastern
group was an areal entity whose languages retained some similarity
to Avestan. They were inscribed in various Aramaic-derived alphabets
which had ultimately evolved from the Achaemenid Imperial Aramaic
script, though Bactrian was written using an adapted Greek script.
Middle
Persian (Pahlavi) was the official language under the Sasanian dynasty
in Iran. It was in use from the 3rd century CE until the beginning
of the 10th century. The script used for Middle Persian in this
era underwent significant maturity. Middle Persian, Parthian and
Sogdian were also used as literary languages by the Manichaeans,
whose texts also survive in various non-Iranian languages, from
Latin to Chinese. Manichaean texts were written in a script closely
akin to the Syriac script.
New
Iranian languages :
Dark green: countries where Iranian languages are official
Teal: countries where Iranian languages are official in
a subdivision
Following the Islamic Conquest of Persia, there were important changes
in the role of the different dialects within the Persian Empire.
The old prestige form of Middle Iranian, also known as Pahlavi,
was replaced by a new standard dialect called Dari as the official
language of the court. The name Dari comes from the word darbâr,
which refers to the royal court, where many of the poets, protagonists,
and patrons of the literature flourished. The Saffarid dynasty in
particular was the first in a line of many dynasties to officially
adopt the new language in 875 CE. Dari may have been heavily influenced
by regional dialects of eastern Iran, whereas the earlier Pahlavi
standard was based more on western dialects. This new prestige dialect
became the basis of Standard New Persian. Medieval Iranian scholars
such as Abdullah Ibn al-Muqaffa (8th century) and Ibn al-Nadim (10th
century) associated the term "Dari" with the eastern province
of Khorasan, while they used the term "Pahlavi" to describe
the dialects of the northwestern areas between Isfahan and Azerbaijan,
and "Pârsi" ("Persian" proper) to describe
the Dialects of Fars. They also noted that the unofficial language
of the royalty itself was yet another dialect, "Khuzi",
associated with the western province of Khuzestan.
Geographic
distribution of modern Iranian languages
The Islamic conquest also brought with it the adoption of Arabic
script for writing Persian and much later, Kurdish, Pashto and Balochi.
All three were adapted to the writing by the addition of a few letters.
This development probably occurred some time during the second half
of the 8th century, when the old middle Persian script began dwindling
in usage. The Arabic script remains in use in contemporary modern
Persian. Tajik script, used to write the Tajik language, was first
Latinised in the 1920s under the then Soviet nationality policy.
The script was however subsequently Cyrillicized in the 1930s by
the Soviet government.
The
geographical regions in which Iranian languages were spoken were
pushed back in several areas by newly neighbouring languages. Arabic
spread into some parts of Western Iran (Khuzestan), and Turkic languages
spread through much of Central Asia, displacing various Iranian
languages such as Sogdian and Bactrian in parts of what is today
Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. In Eastern Europe, mostly
comprising the territory of modern-day Ukraine, southern European
Russia, and parts of the Balkans, the core region of the native
Scythians, Sarmatians, and Alans had been decisively taken over
as a result of absorption and assimilation (e.g. Slavicisation)
by the various Proto-Slavic population of the region, by the 6th
century AD. This resulted in the displacement and extinction of
the once predominant Scythian languages of the region. Sogdian's
close relative Yaghnobi barely survives in a small area of the Zarafshan
valley east of Samarkand, and Saka as Ossetic in the Caucasus, which
is the sole remnant of the once predominant Scythian languages in
Eastern Europe proper and large parts of the North Caucasus. Various
small Iranian languages in the Pamir Mountains survive that are
derived from Eastern Iranian.
Source
:
https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Iranian_languages