KANGJU
The
approximate territory of the Kangju c. 200 CE
Countries
described in Zhang Qian's report. Visited countries are highlighted
in blue
Kangju
Sogdians :
1st century BCE (?) – 5th century CE
Status
: Clan
Capital : Kangu
Common languages : Sogdian language
Historical era :
• Established : 1st century BCE (?)
• Disestablished : 5th century CE
Preceded by : Massagetae
Succeeded by : Hephthalites
Today part of : Uzbekistan and Tajikistan
Kangju
(Chinese: pinyin: Kangju; Wade–Giles: K'ang-chü) was
the Chinese name of an ancient kingdom in Central Asia which became
for a couple of centuries the second greatest power in Transoxiana
after the Yuezhi. Its people, the Kang were an Indo-European semi-nomadic
people probably identical to the Iranian Sogdians or other Iranian
groups closely related to them, such as the Asii.
Name
:
According to John E. Hill, a historian specialising in ancient Central
Asia, "Kangju (W-G: K'ang-chü)" was in or near the
"Talas basin, [modern] Tashkent and Sogdiana". (According
to Edwin Pulleyblank, Beitian – the summer capital of Kangju
– was in or near modern metropolitan Tashkent.)
It
is not clear whether the Chinese name Kangju was intended to transcribe
an ethnic name, or to be descriptive, or both. ju can mean: 'seat',
'central place of activity or authority; 'to settle down,' 'residence,'
or 'to occupy (militarily).'... The term, therefore, could simply
mean "the abode of the Kang," or "territory occupied
by the Kang." ... As kang means 'well-being', 'peaceful,' 'happy;'
'settle', 'stability,' Kangju can be translated as the 'Peaceful
Land,' or 'Abode of the Peaceful (People).' ... Even if the name
Kangju was originally an attempt to transcribe the sounds of a foreign
name, it would still have carried the sense of a peaceful place
to Chinese speakers, and the name 'Kang' would have had overtones
of a peaceful people.
Later
Chinese sources, during the Sui and Tang dynasties, refer to Kangju
as the State of Kang. By that time it was part of the Göktürk
Khaganate.
Pulleyblank
linked Kangju to the Tocharian A word kanka-, probably meaning "stone"
and proposed that the Kangju were originally Tocharians who had
migrated westward into Sogdia and established themselves in Chach
(modern Tashkent). Pulleyblank also suggested that the Jié
tribe Qiangqú might be Kangju people who had been incorporated
into the Xiongnu tribal confederation. Pulleyblank further connected
Kangju to Kànjié (*Kamkar?) and the name Kankar given
to the lower Yaxartes by Persian geographer ibn Khordadbeh.
Joseph
Marquart, Omeljan Pritsak and Peter B. Golden have noted phonetic
similarities between Kangju and Kengeres mentioned in the Orkhon
inscriptions, the Kangarâyê in Transcaucasia, the city
of Kengü Tarban, and the three Pecheneg tribes collectively
known as Kangar mentioned by Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus. Nevertheless,
all those connections remain hypothetical.
Language
:
Archaeological evidence suggests that the Kangju spoke an Iranian
language.
History
:
According to 2nd century BC Chinese sources, Kangju lay north of
the Dayuan and west of the Wusun, bordering the Yuezhi in the south.
Their territory covered the region of the Ferghana Valley and the
area between the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers, with the core territory
along the middle Syr Darya. Since historians of Alexander the Great
do not mention the existence of any political power in the area
except the Khwarezmians, the Kangju must have appeared a little
later. It is likely that the state of the Kangju emerged during
the great upheaval in Central Asia following the withdrawal of the
Yuezhi from Gansu and then the Ili Valley after their defeat by
the Xiongnu and Wusun respectively. Chinese sources state that the
Kangju were tributiaries of the Yuezhi in the south and the Xiongnu
in the east.
Kangju coin: obverse: ruler Wanunkhur of Chach; reverse:
Kangju tamga
Kangju was mentioned by the Chinese traveller and diplomat Zhang
Qian who visited the area c. 128 BCE, whose travels are documented
in Chapter 123 of the Shiji (whose author, Sima Qian, died c. 90
BC):
"Kangju
is situated some 2,000 li [832 kilometers] northwest of Dayuan.
Its people are nomads and resemble the Yuezhi in their customs.
They have 80,000 or 90,000 skilled archers. The country is small,
and borders Dayuan (Ferghana). It acknowledges sovereignty to the
Yuezhi people in the South and the Xiongnu in the East.
Qian
also visited a land known to the Chinese as Yancai (literally "vast
steppe"), which lay north-west of the Kangju. The people of
Yancai and were said to resemble the Kangju in their customs:
Yancai
lies some 2,000 li (832 km) northwest of Kangju (centered on Turkestan
at Beitian). The people are nomads and their customs are generally
similar to those of the people of Kangju. The country has over 100,000
archer warriors, and borders a great shoreless lake, perhaps what
is now known as the Northern Sea (Aral Sea, distance between Tashkent
to Aralsk is about 866 km.
By
the time of the Hanshu (which covers the period from 206 BCE to
23 CE), Kangju had expanded considerably to a nation of some 600,000
individuals, with 120,000 men able to bear arms. Kangju was clearly
now a major power in its own right. By this time it had gained control
of Dayuan and Sogdiana in which it controlled “five lesser
kings”.
In
101 BCE, the Kangju allied themselves with the Dayuan, helping them
preserve their independence against the Han.
The
account on the 'Western Regions' in the Han Dynasty Chinese chronicle,
the Hou Hanshu, 88 (covering the period 25–220 and completed
in the 5th century), based on a report to the Chinese emperor c.
125 CE, mentions that, at that time, Liyi (= Suyi) = Sogdiana, and
both the "old" Yancai (which had changed its name to Alanliao
and seems here to have expanded its territory to the Caspian Sea),
and Yan, a country to Yancai's north, as well as the strategic city
of "Northern Wuyi" (Alexandria Eschate, or modern Khujand),
were all dependent on Kangju.
Y.
A. Zadneprovskiy suggests that the Kangju subjection of Yancai occurred
in the 1st century BC. Yancai is identified with the Aorsi of Roman
records. Scholars have connected name Alanliao to Alans. The Yan
people of the Urals, paid tribute to the Kangju in furs. The Kangju
established close connections with the Sarmatians, their western
neighbors. The westward expansion of the Kangju obliged many of
the Sarmatians to migrate further west, and it may therefore be
concluded that the Kangju played a major in the great migrations
of the time, which played a major role in world history. Through
this expansion the Kangju gained control over key parts of the Silk
Route. The Kangju state came to unite a number of regions which
had sedentary, agricultural and nomadic populations. Although their
territory was small, the fertility of the land and their sophisticated
civilization enabled the Kangju to maintain a large population,
becoming a major military power.
The
Kangju were in frequent struggles with the Wusun, during which they
in the mid 1st century BCE allied themselves with the northern Xiongnu.
The Kangju ruler gave his daughter in marriage to the northern Xiongnu
ruler Zhizhi while Zhizhi married the daughter of the Kangju ruler.
The Xiongnu and Kangju were initially successful, besieging the
Wusun in 42 BCE. The Han however intervened, defeating and killing
the northern Xiongnu ruler in at Talas in 36 BCE (Battle of Zhizhi).
The Kangju ruler was subsequently forced to send his son as a hostage
to the Han court. Nevertheless, the Kangju continued to send embassies
to the Han court and pursued an independent policy, which they were
able to maintain until the 3rd century AD. Evidence of Kangju independence
can be seen in the coinage issued in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD,
during which they issued their own currency which was similar to
that of Khwarezm.
The
biography of the Chinese General Ban Chao in the Hou Hanshu says
in 94 CE that the Yuezhi were arranging a marriage of their king
with a Kangju princess. The Chinese then sent "considerable
presents of silks" to the Yuezhi successfully gaining their
help in pressuring the Kangju to stop supporting the king of Kashgar
against them.
The
3rd century Weilüe states that Kangju was among a number of
countries that "had existed previously and neither grown nor
shrunk." The Kangju subsequently declined. Around 270 AD they
were subdued by the Xionites. Like other Central Asian peoples,
the Kangju probably became subsumed into the Hephthalites.
Kangju
was later known as the State of Kang during the Sui and Tang dynasties.
In the 8th century, some of them seem to have been adherents of
Manicheanism.
Culture
:
The Book of Han describes the way of life of the Kangju elite. Its
ruler spent his winter in the capital city of Beitian, and his summers
at his steppe headquarters, which was a seven days' journey away
on horseback.
The
Kangju are regarded as an Indo-European people, and are generally
held to have been an Iranian people identical with the Sogdians.
Sinologist Edwin G. Pulleyblank has however suggested that the Kangju
could have been Tocharians.
The
ruling elite of the Kangju consisted of nomadic tribes whose customs
were very similar to those of the Yuezhi. Kangju burials of the
early period have been excavatated at Berk-kara and Tamdî,
in which the dead were placed in pit-graves, often covered with
logs, under kurgan mounds. These graves often contain hand-made
pots, iron swords, arrow-heads and jewellery. The burials show that
the traditional culture of the Kangju resembled characteristics
of the Saka. From the beginning of the Christian era "catacomb
graves" (in shaft and chamber tombs) became widespread. This
is seen from the burials of the Kaunchi and Dzhun cultures of the
1st to the 4th centuries AD, which are generally accepted as having
belonged to the Kangju. The Kangju regarded the ram as a noble animal.
References
from written sources and archaeological finds show that the Kangju
reached a considerable level of agricultural sophistication. Much
of the population consisted of a sedentary farming population. Wide
canals from the Kangju period have been discovered, with the land
area under irrigation of the Amu Darya and Syr Darya being four
times greater than today. The irrigation systems of Central Asia
reached their highest levels of development under the Kangju-Kushans
and was in fact superior to those fully developed in the Middle
Ages.
Archaeology
:
Kaunchi culture :
Kangju appears to be a civilisation known to Soviet archaeologists
as the "Kaunchi Culture", dating from the 2nd century
BCE to the early 8th century CE, and centred on the middle course
of the Syr Darya and its tributaries: the Angren, Chirchik, and
Keles. The culture was named after an ancient townsite now known
as Kaunchi-Tepe, which was first studied by G. V. Grigoriev in 1934–37.
Settlements
of the Kaunchi culture were typically located in proximity to water
and usually have monumental oval buildings in the center, at times
with a defensive wall. The largest settlement was a 150 hectare
city known apparently as Kang (Sanskrit Kanka), south of modern
Tashkent and founded in the 1st century CE. Kang had a square layout,
encircled by a wall with inner passages.
The
settlements were surrounded by kurgan burials of a catacomb type
with long dromoses, crypts, and burial vaults, with horse bone trappings
and rites typical of nomads.
The
people predominantly practiced cattle husbandry and nonirrigated
agriculture (grain cultures of millet, barley, wheat, and rice,
cotton, melons, and fruits).
Materials
typical of the culture are typical hand-formed pottery: khums (large
bowls for water and produce), pots, pitchers, and cups adorned with
ram's head on the handles. In the 1st century CE ceramics made on
a potter's wheel became more common. A ram's head motif at first
common was replaced by a bull's head during the late 3rd and early
4th centuries. At that period weapons started appearing in the kurgans.
Kaunchi-type
sites apparently spread from the Otrar region along Syr Darya to
the south of Tashkent. The Kaunchi culture significantly impacted
the archeological cultures in the vast territories of the Middle
Asia.
Inscriptions
:
Some important inscriptions were discovered recently [when?] that
provide information about Kangju and its contacts with China.
•
A dozen wooden
slips with Chinese writing were found at the Xuanquan site in Dunhuang,
China. They are dated to the late Western Han Dynasty (206 BCE-24
CE).
• A
set of Sogdian inscriptions from Kultobe in Kazakhstan; they were
analyzed and deciphered by Nicholas Sims-Williams. They complement
the existing Chinese historical records about Kangju. Sims-Williams
also assigned a likely date to these inscriptions.
• Several
fragmentary Sogdian inscriptions discovered by A. N. Podushkin in
his excavations at Kultobe. They contain archaic features which
shed light on the development of the Sogdian script and language.
Genetics :
A genetic study published in Nature in May 2018 examined the remains
of 6 Kangju buried between ca. 200 AD and 300 AD. The 2 samples
of Y-DNA extracted belonged to the paternal haplogroups R1a1a1b2a
and R1a1a1b2a2b, while the 6 samples mtDNA extracted belonged to
the maternal haplogroups H6a1a, C4a1, U2e2a1, HV13b, U2e1h and A8a1.
The authors of the study found that the Kangju and Wusun had less
East Asian admixture than the Xiongnu and Sakas. Both the Kangju
and Wusun were suggested to be descended from Western Steppe Herders
(WSHs) of the Late Bronze Age who admixed with Siberian hunter-gatherers
and peoples related to the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological
Complex.
Source
:
https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Kangju