AKKADIAN
EMPIRE
Bronze
head of an Akkadian ruler, discovered in Nineveh in 1931, presumably
depicting either Sargon or, more probably, Sargon's grandson Naram-Sin.
Reproduction in the Roemer- und Pelizaeus-Museum Hildesheim, the
original from the National Museum of Iraq having been lost in the
2003 lootings.
Map
of the Akkadian Empire (brown) and the directions in which military
campaigns were conducted (yellow arrows)
Akkadian
Empire c. 2334 - 2154 BC
Capital
:
Akkad
Official languages
: Akkadian and Sumerian
Common languages
: Akkadian and Sumerian (declining)
Religion
: Ancient
Mesopotamian religion
Government
: Monarchy
Sarrum
•
c. 2334 - 2279 BC : Sargon (first)
•
c. 2170 - 2154 BC : Shu-turul (last)
Historical
era : Bronze Age
•
Established : c. 2334
BC
•
Conquests of Sargon of Akkad : c. 2340
- 2284 BC
•
Disestablished : c. 2154
BC
Area
2350
BC : 30,000 km2 (12,000 sq mi)
2300
BC : 650,000 km2 (250,000 sq mi)
2250
BC : 800,000 km2 (310,000 sq mi)
2200
BC : 250,000 km2 (97,000 sq mi)
Preceded
by
Early
Dynastic Period
Second Mariote Kingdom
Umma
Succeeded
by
Gutian
Period (Sumer)
Third
Mariote Kingdom
Ebla
Today
part of : Iraq, Iran, Syria and Turkey
The
Akkadian Empire was the second ancient empire of Mesopotamia, after
the long-lived civilization of Sumer. It was centered in the city
of Akkad /'ækæd and its surrounding region. The empire
united Akkadian (Assyrian and Babylonian) and Sumerian speakers
under one rule. The Akkadian Empire exercised influence across Mesopotamia,
the Levant, and Anatolia, sending military expeditions as far south
as Dilmun and Magan (modern Bahrain and Oman) in the Arabian Peninsula.
During
the 3rd millennium BC, there developed a cultural symbiosis between
the Sumerians and the Akkadians, which included widespread bilingualism.
Akkadian, an East Semitic language, gradually replaced Sumerian
as a spoken language somewhere between the 3rd and the 2nd millennia
BC (the exact dating being a matter of debate).
The
Akkadian Empire reached its political peak between the 24th and
22nd centuries BC, following the conquests by its founder Sargon
of Akkad. Under Sargon and his successors, the Akkadian language
was briefly imposed on neighboring conquered states such as Elam
and Gutium. Akkad is sometimes regarded as the first empire in history,
though the meaning of this term is not precise, and there are earlier
Sumerian claimants.
After
the fall of the Akkadian Empire, the people of Mesopotamia eventually
coalesced into two major Akkadian-speaking nations: Assyria in the
north, and, a few centuries later, Babylonia in the south.
History
of research :
The Bible refers to Akkad as The Great City in Genesis 10:10–12,
which states :
"The
beginning of his [Nimrod's] kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad,
and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. Out of that land he went forth
into Assyria, and builded Nineveh, and Rehoboth-Ir, and Calah, and
Resen between Nineveh and Calah (the same is the great city)."
Nimrod's historical identity is unknown or debated, but Nimrod has
been identified as Sargon of Akkad by some, and others have compared
him with the legendary Gilgamesh, founder of Uruk.
Today, scholars have documented some 7,000 texts from the Akkadian
period, written in both Sumerian and Akkadian. Many later texts
from the successor states of Assyria and Babylonia also deal with
the Akkadian Empire.
Understanding
of the Akkadian Empire continues to be hampered by the fact that
its capital Akkad has not yet been located, despite numerous attempts.
Precise dating of archaeological sites is hindered by the fact that
there are no clear distinctions between artifact assemblages thought
to stem from the preceding Early Dynastic period, and those thought
to be Akkadian. Likewise, material that is thought to be Akkadian
continues to be in use into the Ur III period.
Many
of the more recent insights on the Akkadian Empire have come from
excavations in the Upper Khabur area in modern northeastern Syria
which was to become a part of Assyria after the fall of Akkad. For
example, excavations at Tell Mozan (ancient Urkesh) brought to light
a sealing of Tar'am-Agade, a previously unknown daughter of Naram-Sin,
who was possibly married to an unidentified local endan (ruler).
The excavators at nearby Tell Leilan (ancient Shekhna/Shubat-Enlil)
have used the results from their investigations to argue that the
Akkadian Empire came to an end due to a sudden drought, the so-called
4.2 kiloyear event. The impact of this climate event on Mesopotamia
in general, and on the Akkadian Empire in particular, continues
to be hotly debated.
Excavation
at the modern site of Tell Brak has suggested that the Akkadians
rebuilt a city ("Brak" or "Nagar") on this site,
for use as an administrative center. The city included two large
buildings including a complex with temple, offices, courtyard, and
large ovens.
Dating
and periodization :
The Akkadian Period is generally dated to either: c. 2334 BC –
c. 2154 BC (according to the middle chronology timeline of the Ancient
Near East), or c. 2270 BC – c. 2083 BC (according to the short
chronology timeline of the Ancient Near East.) It was preceded by
the Early Dynastic Period of Mesopotamia (ED) and succeeded by the
Ur III Period, although both transitions are blurry. For example:
it is likely that the rise of Sargon of Akkad coincided with the
late ED Period and that the final Akkadian kings ruled simultaneously
with the Gutian kings alongside rulers at the city-states of both:
Uruk and Lagash. The Akkadian Period is contemporary with: EB IV
(in Israel), EB IVA and EJ IV (in Syria), and EB IIIB (in Turkey.)
Timeline
of rulers :
The relative order of Akkadian kings is clear. The absolute dates
of their reigns are approximate (as with all dates prior to the
late Bronze Age collapse c. 1200 BC).
Ruler |
Middle
Chronology All Dates BC |
Sargon |
2334
- 2279 |
Rimush |
2278
- 2270 |
Manishtushu |
2269
- 2255 |
Naram-Sin |
2254
- 2218 |
Shar-Kali-Sharri |
2217
- 2193 |
Dudu |
2189
- 2169 |
Shu-turul |
2168
- 2154 |
Family
Tree
History
and development of the empire :
Pre-Sargonic Akkad :
Akkad
before expansion (in green). The territory of Sumer under its last
king Lugal-Zage-Si appears in orange. Circa 2350 BC
Sargon
on his victory stele, with a royal hair bun, holding a mace and
wearing a flounced royal coat on his left shoulder with a large
belt (left), followed by an attendant holding a royal umbrella.
The name of Sargon in cuneiform ("King Sargon") appears
faintly in front of his face. Louvre Museum.
Akkadian
official in the retinue of Sargon of Akkad, holding an axe
The Akkadian Empire takes its name from the region and the city
of Akkad, both of which were localized in the general confluence
area of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Although the city of Akkad
has not yet been identified on the ground, it is known from various
textual sources. Among these is at least one text predating the
reign of Sargon. Together with the fact that the name Akkad is of
non-Akkadian origin, this suggests that the city of Akkad may have
already been occupied in pre-Sargonic times.
Sargon
of Akkad :
Sargon of Akkad defeated and captured Lugal-zage-si in the Battle
of Uruk and conquered his empire. The earliest records in the Akkadian
language date to the time of Sargon. Sargon was claimed to be the
son of La'ibum or Itti-Bel, a humble gardener, and possibly a hierodule,
or priestess to Ishtar or Inanna. One legend related to Sargon in
Assyrian times says that
My
mother was a changeling, my father I knew not. The brothers of my
father loved the hills. My city is Azurpiranu (the wilderness herb
fields), which is situated on the banks of the Euphrates. My changeling
mother conceived me, in secret she bore me. She set me in a basket
of rushes, with bitumen she sealed my lid. She cast me into the
river which rose not over me. The river bore me up and carried me
to Akki, the drawer of water. Akki, the drawer of water, took me
as his son and reared me. Akki the drawer of water, appointed me
as his gardener. While I was gardener Ishtar granted me her love,
and for four and (fifty?) ... years I exercised kingship.
Later
claims made on behalf of Sargon were that his mother was an "entu"
priestess (high priestess). The claims might have been made to ensure
a pedigree of nobility, since only a highly placed family could
achieve such a position.
Originally
a cupbearer (Rabshakeh) to a king of Kish with a Semitic name, Ur-Zababa,
Sargon thus became a gardener, responsible for the task of clearing
out irrigation canals. The royal cupbearer at this time was in fact
a prominent political position, close to the king and with various
high level responsibilities not suggested by the title of the position
itself. This gave him access to a disciplined corps of workers,
who also may have served as his first soldiers. Displacing Ur-Zababa,
Sargon was crowned king, and he entered upon a career of foreign
conquest. Four times he invaded Syria and Canaan, and he spent three
years thoroughly subduing the countries of "the west"
to unite them with Mesopotamia "into a single empire".
However,
Sargon took this process further, conquering many of the surrounding
regions to create an empire that reached westward as far as the
Mediterranean Sea and perhaps Cyprus (Kaptara); northward as far
as the mountains (a later Hittite text asserts he fought the Hattian
king Nurdaggal of Burushanda, well into Anatolia); eastward over
Elam; and as far south as Magan (Oman) — a region over which
he reigned for purportedly 56 years, though only four "year-names"
survive. He consolidated his dominion over his territories by replacing
the earlier opposing rulers with noble citizens of Akkad, his native
city where loyalty would thus be ensured.
Prisoners escorted by a soldier, on a victory stele of Sargon
of Akkad, circa 2300 BCE
The
hairstyle of the prisoners (curly hair on top and short hair on
the sides) is characteristic of Sumerians, as also seen on the Standard
of Ur. Louvre Museum.
Trade extended from the silver mines of Anatolia to the lapis lazuli
mines in modern Afghanistan, the cedars of Lebanon and the copper
of Magan. This consolidation of the city-states of Sumer and Akkad
reflected the growing economic and political power of Mesopotamia.
The empire's breadbasket was the rain-fed agricultural system of
Assyria and a chain of fortresses was built to control the imperial
wheat production.
Images
of Sargon were erected on the shores of the Mediterranean, in token
of his victories, and cities and palaces were built at home with
the spoils of the conquered lands. Elam and the northern part of
Mesopotamia (Assyria/Subartu) were also subjugated, and rebellions
in Sumer were put down. Contract tablets have been found dated in
the years of the campaigns against Canaan and against Sarlak, king
of Gutium. He also boasted of having subjugated the "four-quarters"
— the lands surrounding Akkad to the north (Assyria), the
south (Sumer), the east (Elam), and the west (Martu). Some of the
earliest historiographic texts (ABC 19, 20) suggest he rebuilt the
city of Babylon (Bab-ilu) in its new location near Akkad.
Sargon,
throughout his long life, showed special deference to the Sumerian
deities, particularly Inanna (Ishtar), his patroness, and Zababa,
the warrior god of Kish. He called himself "The anointed priest
of Anu" and "the great ensi of Enlil" and his daughter,
Enheduanna, was installed as priestess to Nanna at the temple in
Ur.
Troubles
multiplied toward the end of his reign. A later Babylonian text
states :
In
his old age, all the lands revolted against him, and they besieged
him in Akkad (the city) [but] he went forth to battle and defeated
them, he knocked them over and destroyed their vast army.
It
refers to his campaign in "Elam", where he defeated a
coalition army led by the King of Awan and forced the vanquished
to become his vassals.
Also
shortly after, another revolt took place :
The
Subartu (mountainous tribes of Assyria) the upper country—in
their turn attacked, but they submitted to his arms, and Sargon
settled their habitations, and he smote them grievously.
Rimush
and Manishtushu :
Akkadian soldiers slaying enemies, circa 2300 BC, possibly
from a Victory Stele of Rimush
Sargon had crushed opposition even at old age. These difficulties
broke out again in the reign of his sons, where revolts broke out
during the nine-year reign of Rimush (2278–2270 BC), who fought
hard to retain the empire, and was successful until he was assassinated
by some of his own courtiers. According to his inscriptions, he
faced widespread revolts, and had to reconquer the cities of Ur,
Umma, Adab, Lagash, Der, and Kazallu from rebellious ensis: Rimush
introduced mass slaughter and large scale destruction of the Sumerian
city-states, and maintained meticulous records of his destructions.
Most of the major Sumerian cities were destroyed, and Sumerian human
losses were enormous :
Sumerian
casualties from the campaigns of Rimush |
Destroyed
Cities |
Particulars |
Killed |
Adab
and Zabala : 15,718
Umma and KI.AN
: 8,900
Ur and Lagash
: 8,049
Kazallu
: 12,052
(Three
battles in Sumer) : 11,322
Total
: 56,041 |
Captured
and enslaved |
Adab
and Zabala : 14,576
Umma and KI.AN
: 3,540
Ur and Lagash
: 5,460
Kazallu
: 5,862
(Three
battles in Sumer) : ---
Total
: 29,438 |
"Expelled
and annihilated" |
Adab
and Zabala : ---
Umma and KI.AN
: 5,600
Ur and Lagash
: 5,985
Kazallu
: ---
(Three
battles in Sumer) : 14,100
Total
: 25,685 |
Total
casualties |
Adab
and Zabala : ---
Umma and KI.AN
: ---
Ur and Lagash
: ---
Kazallu
: ---
(Three
battles in Sumer) : ---
Total
: 111,164 |
Rimush's
elder brother, Manishtushu (2269–2255 BC) succeeded him. The
latter seems to have fought a sea battle against 32 kings who had
gathered against him and took control over their pre-Arab country,
consisting of modern-day United Arab Emirates and Oman. Despite
the success, like his brother he seems to have been assassinated
in a palace conspiracy.
Naram-Sin
:
Portrait of Naram-Sin, with inscription in his name
Manishtushu's son and successor, Naram-Sin (2254–2218 BC),
due to vast military conquests, assumed the imperial title "King
Naram-Sin, king of the four-quarters" (Lugal Naram-Sîn,
Šar kibrat 'arbaim), the four-quarters as a reference to the
entire world. He was also for the first time in Sumerian culture,
addressed as "the god (Sumerian = DINGIR, Akkadian = ilu) of
Agade" (Akkad), in opposition to the previous religious belief
that kings were only representatives of the people towards the gods.
He also faced revolts at the start of his reign, but quickly crushed
them.
Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, celebrating victory against
the Lullubi from Zagros 2260 BC
He
is wearing a horned helmet, a symbol of divinity, and is also portrayed
in a larger scale in comparison to others to emphasize his superiority.
Brought back from Sippar to Susa as war prize in the 12th century
BC.
Naram-Sin also recorded the Akkadian conquest of Ebla as well as
Armanum and its king. The location of Armanum is debated: it is
sometimes identified with a Syrian kingdom mentioned in the tablets
of Ebla as Armi, whose location is also debated; while historian
Adelheid Otto identifies it with the Citadel of Bazi at the Tell
Banat complex on the Euphrates River between Ebla and Tell Brak,
others like Wayne Horowitz identify it with Aleppo. Further, while
most scholars place Armanum in Syria, Michael C. Astour believes
it to be located north of the Hamrin Mountains in northern Iraq.
To
better police Syria, he built a royal residence at Tell Brak, a
crossroads at the heart of the Khabur River basin of the Jezirah.
Naram-Sin campaigned against Magan which also revolted; Naram-Sin
"marched against Magan and personally caught Mandannu, its
king", where he instated garrisons to protect the main roads.
The chief threat seemed to be coming from the northern Zagros Mountains,
the Lulubis and the Gutians. A campaign against the Lullubi led
to the carving of the "Victory Stele of Naram-Suen", now
in the Louvre. Hittite sources claim Naram-Sin of Akkad even ventured
into Anatolia, battling the Hittite and Hurrian kings Pamba of Hatti,
Zipani of Kanesh, and 15 others. This newfound Akkadian wealth may
have been based upon benign climatic conditions, huge agricultural
surpluses and the confiscation of the wealth of other peoples.
The
economy was highly planned. Grain was cleaned, and rations of grain
and oil were distributed in standardized vessels made by the city's
potters. Taxes were paid in produce and labour on public walls,
including city walls, temples, irrigation canals and waterways,
producing huge agricultural surpluses.
In
later Assyrian and Babylonian texts, the name Akkad, together with
Sumer, appears as part of the royal title, as in the Sumerian LUGAL
KI-EN-GI KI-URI or Akkadian Šar mat Šumeri u Akkadi, translating
to "king of Sumer and Akkad". This title was assumed by
the king who seized control of Nippur, the intellectual and religious
center of southern Mesopotamia.
During
the Akkadian period, the Akkadian language became the lingua franca
of the Middle East, and was officially used for administration,
although the Sumerian language remained as a spoken and literary
language. The spread of Akkadian stretched from Syria to Elam, and
even the Elamite language was temporarily written in Mesopotamian
cuneiform. Akkadian texts later found their way to far-off places,
from Egypt (in the Amarna Period) and Anatolia, to Persia (Behistun).
Submission
of Sumerian kings :
The submission of some Sumerian rulers to the Akkadian Empire, is
recorded in the seal inscriptions of Sumerian rulers such as Lugal-ushumgal,
governor (ensi) of Lagash ("Shirpula"), circa 2230-2210
BCE. Several inscriptions of Lugal-ushumgal are known, particularly
seal impressions, which refer to him as governor of Lagash and at
the time a vassal (arad, "servant" or "slave")
of Naram-Sin, as well as his successor Shar-kali-sharri. One of
these seals proclaims :
“Naram-Sin,
the mighty God of Agade, king of the four corners of the world,
Lugal-ushumgal, the scribe, ensi of Lagash, is thy servant.”
—
Seal of Lugal-ushumgal as vassal of Naram-sin.
It can be considered that Lugal-ushumgal was a collaborator of the
Akkadian Empire, as was Meskigal, ruler of Adab. Later however,
Lugal-ushumgal was succeeded by Puzer-Mama who, as Akkadian power
waned, achieved independence from Shar-Kali-Sharri, assuming the
title of "King of Lagash" and starting the illustrious
Second Dynasty of Lagash.
Collapse
:
The
Gutians capturing a Babylonian city, as the Akkadians are making
a stand outside of their city. 19th century illustration
The empire of Akkad fell, perhaps in the 22nd century BC, within
180 years of its founding, ushering in a "Dark Age" with
no prominent imperial authority until Third Dynasty of Ur. The region's
political structure may have reverted to the status quo ante of
local governance by city-states.
Shu-turul
appears to have restored some centralized authority; however, he
was unable to prevent the empire eventually collapsing outright
from the invasion of barbarian peoples from the Zagros Mountains
known as the Gutians.
Little
is known about the Gutian period, or how long it endured. Cuneiform
sources suggest that the Gutians' administration showed little concern
for maintaining agriculture, written records, or public safety;
they reputedly released all farm animals to roam about Mesopotamia
freely and soon brought about famine and rocketing grain prices.
The Sumerian king Ur-Nammu (2112–2095 BC) cleared the Gutians
from Mesopotamia during his reign.
The
Sumerian King List, describing the Akkadian Empire after the death
of Shar-kali-shari, states :
Who
was king? Who was not king? Irgigi the king; Nanum, the king; Imi
the king; Ilulu, the king—the four of them were kings but
reigned only three years. Dudu reigned 21 years; Shu-Turul, the
son of Dudu, reigned 15 years. ... Agade was defeated and its kingship
carried off to Uruk. In Uruk, Ur-ningin reigned 7 years, Ur-gigir,
son of Ur-ningin, reigned 6 years; Kuda reigned 6 years; Puzur-ili
reigned 5 years, Ur-Utu reigned 6 years. Uruk was smitten with weapons
and its kingship carried off by the Gutian hordes.
However,
there are no known year-names or other archaeological evidence verifying
any of these later kings of Akkad or Uruk, apart from several artefact
referencing king Dudu of Akkad and Shu-turul. The named kings of
Uruk may have been contemporaries of the last kings of Akkad, but
in any event could not have been very prominent.
In
the Gutian hordes, (first reigned) a nameless king; (then) Imta
reigned 3 years as king; Shulme reigned 6 years; Elulumesh reigned
6 years; Inimbakesh reigned 5 years; Igeshuash reigned 6 years;
Iarlagab reigned 15 years; Ibate reigned 3 years; ... reigned 3
years; Kurum reigned 1 year; ... reigned 3 years; ... reigned 2
years; Iararum reigned 2 years; Ibranum reigned 1 year; Hablum reigned
2 years; Puzur-Sin son of Hablum reigned 7 years; Iarlaganda reigned
7 years; ... reigned 7 years; ... reigned 40 days. Total 21 kings
reigned 91 years, 40 days.
"Cylinder Seal with King or God and Vanquished Lion"
(Old Akkadian). The Walters Art Museum
The period between c. 2112 BC and 2004 BC is known as the Ur III
period. Documents again began to be written in Sumerian, although
Sumerian was becoming a purely literary or liturgical language,
much as Latin later would be in Medieval Europe.
One
explanation for the end of the Akkadian empire is simply that the
Akkadian dynasty could not maintain its political supremacy over
other independently powerful city-states.
Drought
:
One theory associates regional decline at the end of the Akkadian
period (and of the First Intermediary Period following the Old Kingdom
in Ancient Egypt) was associated with rapidly increasing aridity,
and failing rainfall in the region of the Ancient Near East, caused
by a global centennial-scale drought.
Harvey Weiss has shown that Archaeological and soil-stratigraphic
data define the origin, growth, and collapse of Subir, the third
millennium rain-fed agriculture civilization of northern Mesopotamia
on the Habur Plains of Syria. At 2200 BC, a marked increase in aridity
and wind circulation, subsequent to a volcanic eruption, induced
a considerable degradation of land-use conditions. After four centuries
of urban life, this abrupt climatic change evidently caused abandonment
of Tell Leilan, regional desertion, and the collapse of the Akkadian
empire based in southern Mesopotamia. Synchronous collapse in adjacent
regions suggests that the impact of the abrupt climatic change was
extensive.
Peter
B. deMenocal has shown "there was an influence of the North
Atlantic Oscillation on the streamflow of the Tigris and Euphrates
at this time, which led to the collapse of the Akkadian Empire".
More recent analysis of simulations from the HadCM3 climate model
indicate that there was a shift to a more arid climate on a timescale
that is consistent with the collapse of the empire.
Impression
of a cylinder seal of the time of Akkadian King Sharkalisharri (c.2200
BC), with central inscription: "The Divine Sharkalisharri Prince
of Akkad, Ibni-Sharrum the Scribe his servant". The long-horned
buffalo is thought to have come from the Indus Valley, and testifies
to exchanges with Meluhha (the Indus Valley civilization) in a case
of Indus-Mesopotamia relations. Circa 2217–2193 BC. Louvre
Museum.
Excavation at Tell Leilan suggests that this site was abandoned
soon after the city's massive walls were constructed, its temple
rebuilt and its grain production reorganized. The debris, dust,
and sand that followed show no trace of human activity. Soil samples
show fine wind-blown sand, no trace of earthworm activity, reduced
rainfall and indications of a drier and windier climate. Evidence
shows that skeleton-thin sheep and cattle died of drought, and up
to 28,000 people abandoned the site, seeking wetter areas elsewhere.
Tell Brak shrank in size by 75%. Trade collapsed. Nomadic herders
such as the Amorites moved herds closer to reliable water suppliers,
bringing them into conflict with Akkadian populations. This climate-induced
collapse seems to have affected the whole of the Middle East, and
to have coincided with the collapse of the Egyptian Old Kingdom.
This
collapse of rain-fed agriculture in the Upper Country meant the
loss to southern Mesopotamia of the agrarian subsidies which had
kept the Akkadian Empire solvent. Water levels within the Tigris
and Euphrates fell 1.5 meters beneath the level of 2600 BC, and
although they stabilized for a time during the following Ur III
period, rivalries between pastoralists and farmers increased. Attempts
were undertaken to prevent the former from herding their flocks
in agricultural lands, such as the building of a 180 km (112 mi)
wall known as the "Repeller of the Amorites" between the
Tigris and Euphrates under the Ur III ruler Shu-Sin. Such attempts
led to increased political instability; meanwhile, severe depression
occurred to re-establish demographic equilibrium with the less favorable
climatic conditions.
Richard
Zettler has critiqued the drought theory, observing that the chronology
of the Akkadian empire is very uncertain and that available evidence
is not sufficient to show its economic dependence on the northern
areas excavated by Weiss and others. He also criticizes Weiss for
taking Akkadian writings literally to describe certain catastrophic
events.
According
to Joan Oates, at Tell Brak, the soil "signal" associated
with the drought lies below the level of Naram-Sin's palace. However,
evidence may
suggest a tightening of Akkadian control following the Brak 'event',
for example, the construction of the heavily fortified 'palace'
itself and the apparent introduction of greater numbers of Akkadian
as opposed to local officials, perhaps a reflection of unrest in
the countryside of the type that often follows some natural catastrophe.
Furthermore,
Brak remained occupied and functional after the fall of the Akkadians.
In
2019, a study by Hokkaido University on fossil corals in Oman provides
an evidence that prolonged winter shamal seasons led to the salinization
of the irrigated fields; hence, a dramatic decrease in crop production
triggered a widespread famine and eventually the collapse of the
ancient Akkadian Empire.
Government
:
Akkadian
Empire soldiers on the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, circa 2250 BC
The Akkadian government formed a "classical standard"
with which all future Mesopotamian states compared themselves. Traditionally,
the ensi was the highest functionary of the Sumerian city-states.
In later traditions, one became an ensi by marrying the goddess
Inanna, legitimising the rulership through divine consent.
Initially,
the monarchical lugal (lu = man, gal =Great) was subordinate to
the priestly ensi, and was appointed at times of troubles, but by
later dynastic times, it was the lugal who had emerged as the preeminent
role, having his own "é" (= house) or "palace",
independent from the temple establishment. By the time of Mesalim,
whichever dynasty controlled the city of Kish was recognised as
šar kiššati (= king of Kish), and was considered
preeminent in Sumer, possibly because this was where the two rivers
approached, and whoever controlled Kish ultimately controlled the
irrigation systems of the other cities downstream.
As
Sargon extended his conquest from the "Lower Sea" (Persian
Gulf), to the "Upper Sea" (Mediterranean), it was felt
that he ruled "the totality of the lands under heaven",
or "from sunrise to sunset", as contemporary texts put
it. Under Sargon, the ensis generally retained their positions,
but were seen more as provincial governors. The title šar kiššati
became recognised as meaning "lord of the universe". Sargon
is even recorded as having organised naval expeditions to Dilmun
(Bahrain) and Magan, amongst the first organised military naval
expeditions in history. Whether he also did in the case of the Mediterranean
with the kingdom of Kaptara (possibly Cyprus), as claimed in later
documents, is more questionable.
With
Naram-Sin, Sargon's grandson, this went further than with Sargon,
with the king not only being called "Lord of the Four-Quarters
(of the Earth)", but also elevated to the ranks of the dingir
(= gods), with his own temple establishment. Previously a ruler
could, like Gilgamesh, become divine after death but the Akkadian
kings, from Naram-Sin onward, were considered gods on earth in their
lifetimes. Their portraits showed them of larger size than mere
mortals and at some distance from their retainers.
One
strategy adopted by both Sargon and Naram-Sin, to maintain control
of the country, was to install their daughters, Enheduanna and Emmenanna
respectively, as high priestess to Sin, the Akkadian version of
the Sumerian moon deity, Nanna, at Ur, in the extreme south of Sumer;
to install sons as provincial ensi governors in strategic locations;
and to marry their daughters to rulers of peripheral parts of the
Empire (Urkesh and Marhashe). A well documented case of the latter
is that of Naram-Sin's daughter Tar'am-Agade at Urkesh.
Records
at the Brak administrative complex suggest that the Akkadians appointed
locals as tax collectors.
Economy
:
Cylinder
seal of the scribe Kalki, showing Prince Ubil-Eshtar, probable brother
of Sargon, with dignitaries (an archer in front, the scribe holding
a tablet following the Prince, and two dignitaries with weapons).
The population of Akkad, like nearly all pre-modern states, was
entirely dependent upon the agricultural systems of the region,
which seem to have had two principal centres: the irrigated farmlands
of southern Iraq that traditionally had a yield of 30 grains returned
for each grain sown and the rain-fed agriculture of northern Iraq,
known as the "Upper Country."
Southern
Iraq during Akkadian period seems to have been approaching its modern
rainfall level of less than 20 mm (0.8 in) per year, with the result
that agriculture was totally dependent upon irrigation. Before the
Akkadian period, the progressive salinisation of the soils, produced
by poorly drained irrigation, had been reducing yields of wheat
in the southern part of the country, leading to the conversion to
more salt-tolerant barley growing. Urban populations there had peaked
already by 2,600 BC, and demographic pressures were high, contributing
to the rise of militarism apparent immediately before the Akkadian
period (as seen in the Stele of the Vultures of Eannatum). Warfare
between city states had led to a population decline, from which
Akkad provided a temporary respite. It was this high degree of agricultural
productivity in the south that enabled the growth of the highest
population densities in the world at this time, giving Akkad its
military advantage.
Sea shell of a murex bearing the name of Rimush, king of Kish, c.
2270 BC, Louvre, traded from the Mediterranean coast where it was
used by Canaanites to make a purple dye.
The water table in this region was very high and replenished regularly—by
winter storms in the headwaters of the Tigris and Euphrates from
October to March and from snow-melt from March to July. Flood levels,
that had been stable from about 3,000 to 2,600 BC, had started falling,
and by the Akkadian period were a half-meter to a meter lower than
recorded previously. Even so, the flat country and weather uncertainties
made flooding much more unpredictable than in the case of the Nile;
serious deluges seem to have been a regular occurrence, requiring
constant maintenance of irrigation ditches and drainage systems.
Farmers were recruited into regiments for this work from August
to October—a period of food shortage—under the control
of city temple authorities, thus acting as a form of unemployment
relief. Gwendolyn Leick has suggested that this was Sargon's original
employment for the king of Kish, giving him experience in effectively
organising large groups of men; a tablet reads, "Sargon, the
king, to whom Enlil permitted no rival—5,400 warriors ate
bread daily before him".
Harvest
was in the late spring and during the dry summer months. Nomadic
Amorites from the northwest would pasture their flocks of sheep
and goats to graze on the crop residue and be watered from the river
and irrigation canals. For this privilege, they would have to pay
a tax in wool, meat, milk, and cheese to the temples, who would
distribute these products to the bureaucracy and priesthood. In
good years, all would go well, but in bad years, wild winter pastures
would be in short supply, nomads would seek to pasture their flocks
in the grain fields, and conflicts with farmers would result. It
would appear that the subsidizing of southern populations by the
import of wheat from the north of the Empire temporarily overcame
this problem, and it seems to have allowed economic recovery and
a growing population within this region.
Foreign
trade :
Location
of foreign lands for the Mesopotamians, including Elam, Magan, Dilmun,
Marhashi and Meluhha
As a result, Sumer and Akkad had a surplus of agricultural products
but was short of almost everything else, particularly metal ores,
timber and building stone, all of which had to be imported. The
spread of the Akkadian state as far as the "silver mountain"
(possibly the Taurus Mountains), the "cedars" of Lebanon,
and the copper deposits of Magan, was largely motivated by the goal
of securing control over these imports. One tablet reads :
"Sargon,
the king of Kish, triumphed in thirty-four battles (over the cities)
up to the edge of the sea (and) destroyed their walls. He made the
ships from Meluhha, the ships from Magan (and) the ships from Dilmun
tie up alongside the quay of Agade. Sargon the king prostrated himself
before (the god) Dagan (and) made supplication to him; (and) he
(Dagan) gave him the upper land, namely Mari, Yarmuti, (and) Ebla,
up to the Cedar Forest (and) up to the Silver Mountain"
—
Inscription by Sargon of Akkad (ca.2270–2215 BCE)
International trade developed during the Akkadian period. Indus-Mesopotamia
relations also seem to have expanded: Sargon of Akkad (circa 2300
or 2250 BC), was the first Mesopotamian ruler to make an explicit
reference to the region of Meluhha, which is generally understood
as being the Baluchistan or the Indus area.
Culture
:
Akkadian art :
Nasiriyah
Victory Stele of Naram-Sin
Soldier with sword, naked captives, on the Nasiriyah stele
of Naram-Sin
In art, there was a great emphasis on the kings of the dynasty,
alongside much that continued earlier Sumerian art. Little architecture
remains. In large works and small ones such as seals, the degree
of realism was considerably increased, but the seals show a "grim
world of cruel conflict, of danger and uncertainty, a world in which
man is subjected without appeal to the incomprehensible acts of
distant and fearful divinities who he must serve but cannot love.
This sombre mood ... remained characteristic of Mesopotamian art..."
Akkadian sculpture
is remarkable for its fineness and realism, which shows a clear
advancement compared to the previous period of Sumerian art.
The Bassetki statue, another example of Akkadian artistic
realism
The
Manishtushu statue
Statue
of an Akkadian ruler. From Assur, Iraq, c. 2300 BCE. Pergamon Museum
Fragment
of the statue of a devotee, with inscription in the name of Naram-Sin:
"To the god Erra, for the life of Naram-Sin, the powerful,
his companion, the king of the four regions, Shu'astakkal, the scribe,
the majordomo, has dedicated his statue".
Seals
:
The Akkadians used visual arts as a vehicle of ideology. They developed
a new style for cylinder seals, by reusing traditional animal decorations
but organizing them around inscriptions, which often became central
parts of the layout. The figures also became more sculptural and
naturalistic. New elements were also included, especially in relation
to the rich Akkadian mythology.
Inscription "Adda, the scribe", hunting god with bow and
an arrow, Ishtar with weapons rising from her shoulders, emerging
sun-god Shamash, Zu bird of destiny, water god Ea with bull between
legs, two-faced attendant god Usimu with right hand raised.
Akkadian
seal, Agricultural scene. Louvre Museum
Summer
God and Dumuzi. Louvre Museum
Ea
wrestling with a water buffaloe, and bull-man Endiku fighting with
a lion
Language
:
Tablet
in Akkadian language recording domestic animals, Bismaya, reign
of Shar-kali-sharri, c. 2100 BC, clay – Oriental Institute
Museum, University of Chicago
During the 3rd millennium BC, there developed a very intimate cultural
symbiosis between the Sumerians and the Akkadians, which included
widespread bilingualism. The influence of Sumerian on Akkadian (and
vice versa) is evident in all areas, from lexical borrowing on a
massive scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence.
This has prompted scholars to refer to Sumerian and Akkadian in
the third millennium as a sprachbund. Akkadian gradually replaced
Sumerian as a spoken language somewhere around 2000 BC (the exact
dating being a matter of debate), but Sumerian continued to be used
as a sacred, ceremonial, literary, and scientific language in Mesopotamia
until the 1st century AD.
Poet–priestess
Enheduanna :
Enheduanna,
daughter of Sargon of Akkad, circa 2300 BC
Sumerian literature continued in rich development during the Akkadian
period. Enheduanna, the "wife (Sumerian dam = high priestess)
of Nanna [the Sumerian moon god] and daughter of Sargon" of
the temple of Sin at Ur, who lived c. 2285–2250 BC, is the
first poet in history whose name is known. Her known works include
hymns to the goddess Inanna, the Exaltation of Inanna and In-nin
sa-gur-ra. A third work, the Temple Hymns, a collection of specific
hymns, addresses the sacred temples and their occupants, the deity
to whom they were consecrated. The works of this poet are significant,
because although they start out using the third person, they shift
to the first person voice of the poet herself, and they mark a significant
development in the use of cuneiform. As poet, princess, and priestess,
she was a person who, according to William W. Hallo, "set standards
in all three of her roles for many succeeding centuries"
In
the Exultation of Inanna,
Enheduanna
depicts Inanna as disciplining mankind as a goddess of battle. She
thereby unites the warlike Akkadian Ishtar's qualities to those
of the gentler Sumerian goddess of love and fecundity. She likens
Inanna to a great storm bird who swoops down on the lesser gods
and sends them fluttering off like surprised bats. Then, in probably
the most interesting part of the hymn, Enheduanna herself steps
forward in the first person to recite her own past glories, establishing
her credibility, and explaining her present plight. She has been
banished as high priestess from the temple in the city of Ur and
from Uruk and exiled to the steppe. She begs the moon god Nanna
to intercede for her because the city of Uruk, under the ruler Lugalanne,
has rebelled against Sargon. The rebel, Lugalanne, has even destroyed
the temple Eanna, one of the greatest temples in the ancient world,
and then made advances on his sister-in-law.
Curse
of Akkad :
Goddess
Ishtar on an Akkadian seal, 2350–2150 BC
Later material described how the fall of Akkad was due to Naram-Sin's
attack upon the city of Nipper. When prompted by a pair of inauspicious
oracles, the king sacked the E-kur temple, supposedly protected
by the god Enlil, head of the pantheon. As a result of this, eight
chief deities of the Anunnaki pantheon were supposed to have come
together and withdrawn their support from Akkad.
For
the first time since cities were built and founded,
The great agricultural tracts produced no grain,
The inundated tracts produced no fish,
The irrigated orchards produced neither syrup nor wine,
The gathered clouds did not rain, the masgurum did not grow.
At that time, one shekel's worth of oil was only one-half quart,
One shekel's worth of grain was only one-half quart. . . .
These sold at such prices in the markets of all the cities!
He who slept on the roof, died on the roof,
He who slept in the house, had no burial,
People were flailing at themselves from hunger.
The kings of Akkad were legendary among later Mesopotamian civilizations,
with Sargon understood as the prototype of a strong and wise leader,
and his grandson Naram-Sin considered the wicked and impious leader
(Unheilsherrscher in the analysis of Hans Gustav Güterbock)
who brought ruin upon his kingdom.
Technology
:
Black-and-white photograph of a statue consisting of an inscribed,
round pedestal on top of which sits a seated, nude, male figure
of which only the legs and lower torso are preserved.
Life-size
Bassetki Statue from the reign of Naram-Sin of Akkad with an inscription
mentioning the construction of a temple in Akkad. National Museum
of Iraq.
Tablets from the periods reads, "(From the earliest days) no-one
had made a statue of lead, (but) Rimush king of Kish, had a statue
of himself made of lead. It stood before Enlil; and it recited his
(Rimush's) virtues to the idu of the gods". The copper Bassetki
Statue, cast with the lost wax method, testifies to the high level
of skill that craftsmen achieved during the Akkadian period.
Achievements
:
The empire was bound together by roads, along which there was a
regular postal service. Clay seals that took the place of stamps
bear the names of Sargon and his son. A cadastral survey seems also
to have been instituted, and one of the documents relating to it
states that a certain Uru-Malik, whose name appears to indicate
his Canaanite origin, was governor of the land of the Amorites,
or Amurru as the semi-nomadic people of Syria and Canaan were called
in Akkadian. It is probable that the first collection of astronomical
observations and terrestrial omens was made for a library established
by Sargon. The earliest "year names", whereby each year
of a king's reign was named after a significant event performed
by that king, date from Sargon's reign. Lists of these "year
names" henceforth became a calendrical system used in most
independent Mesopotamian city-states. In Assyria, however, years
came to be named for the annual presiding limmu official appointed
by the king, rather than for an event.
Source
:
https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Akkadian_Empire