MUSLIM
CONQUEST IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT
Muslim
conquests in the Indian subcontinent mainly took place from the
12th to the 16th centuries, though earlier Muslim conquests include
the invasions into modern Afghanistan and Pakistan and the Umayyad
campaigns in India, during the time of the Rajput kingdoms in the
8th century.
Mahmud
of Ghazni, the first ruler to hold the title Sultan, who preserved
an ideological link to the suzerainty of the Abbasid Caliphate,
invaded and plundered vast parts of Punjab, Gujarat, starting from
the Indus River, during the 10th century.
After the capture of Lahore and the end of the Ghaznavids, the Ghurid
Empire ruled by Muhammad of Ghor and Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad laid
the foundation of Muslim rule in India. In 1206, Bakhtiyar Khalji,
whose invasion caused the disappearance of Buddhism from East India,
led the Muslim conquest of Bengal, marking the eastern-most expansion
of Islam at the time. The Ghurid Empire soon evolved into the Delhi
Sultanate ruled by Qutb al-Din Aibak, the founder of the Mamluk
dynasty. With the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate, Islam was
spread across most parts of the Indian subcontinent.
In
the 14th century, the Khalji dynasty, under Alauddin Khalji, temporarily
extended Muslim rule southwards to Gujarat, Rajasthan and the Deccan,
while the Tughlaq dynasty temporarily expanded its territorial reach
till Tamil Nadu. The break up of the Delhi Sultanate resulted in
several Muslim sultanates and dynasties to emerge across the Indian
subcontinent, such as the Gujarat Sultanate, Malwa Sultanate, the
Bahmani Sultanate and the wealthy Bengal Sultanate, a major trading
nation in the world. Some of these were however followed by Hindu
re-conquests and resistance from the native powers, and states such
as the Kamma Nayakas, Vijayanagaras, Gajapatis, Cheros, Reddys and
Rajput states.
Prior
to the full rise of the Mughal Empire founded by Babur, one of the
gunpowder empires, which annexed almost all of the ruling elites
of the whole of South Asia, the Sur Empire ruled by Sher Shah Suri
conquered large territories in the northern parts of India. Akbar
The Great gradually enlarged the Mughal Empire to include nearly
all of South Asia, but the zenith was reached in the end of the
17th century, when the reign under emperor Aurangzeb witnessed the
full establishment of Islamic sharia through the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri.
The
Mughals suffered a massive decline in the early 18th century after
Afsharid ruler Nader Shah's invasion, an unexpected attack that
mortified even the British Empire. This provided opportunities for
the powerful Mysore Kingdom, Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad, Maratha
Empire, Sikh Empire, Nizams of Hyderabad to exercise control over
large regions of the Indian subcontinent.
After
the Battle of Plassey, Battle of Buxar and the long Anglo-Mysore
Wars, the East India Company ended up seizing control of the entire
Indian subcontinent. By the end of the 18th century, European powers,
mainly the British Empire, commenced to extend political influence
over the Muslim world, as well as extending into the Indian subcontinent,
and by the end of the 19th century, much of the Muslim world as
well as the Indian subcontinent, came under European colonial domination,
most notably the British Raj.
Early
Muslim presence :
Islam in South Asia existed in communities along the Arab coastal
trade routes in Sindh, Bengal, Gujarat, Kerala, and Ceylon as soon
as the religion originated and had gained early acceptance in the
Arabian Peninsula, though the first incursion by the new Muslim
successor states of the Arab World occurred around 636 CE or 643
AD, during the Rashidun Caliphate, long before any Arab army reached
the frontier of India by land.
The
connection between the Sind and Islam was established by the initial
Muslim missions during the Rashidun Caliphate. Al-Hakim ibn Jabalah
al-Abdi, who attacked Makran in the year 649 AD, was an early partisan
of Ali ibn Abu Talib. During the caliphate of Ali, many Hindus of
Sindh had came under influence of Shi'ism and some even participated
in the Battle of Camel and died fighting for Ali. Under the Umayyads
(661 - 750 AD), many Shias sought asylum in the region of Sindh,
to live in relative peace in the remote area. Ziyad Hindi is one
of those refugees.
Arab
naval expeditions :
Uthman b. Abul As Al Sakifi, governor of Bahrain and Oman, sent
out ships to raid Thane, near modern-day Mumbai, while his brother
Hakam sailed to Broach and a third fleet sailed to Debal under his
younger brother Mughira either in 636 CE or 643 AD. According to
one source all three expeditions were successful, however, another
source states Mughira was defeated and killed at Debal. These expeditions
were sent without the Caliph Umar's consent, and he rebuked Uthman,
saying that had the Arabs lost any men the Caliph would have killed
an equal number of men from Utham's tribe in retaliation. The expeditions
were sent to attack pirate nests, to safeguard Arabian trade in
the Arabian Sea, and not to start the conquest of India.
Rashidun
Caliphate and the Indian frontier :
Arab
campaigns in the Indian Subcontinent. A generic representation,
not to exact scale
The kingdoms of Kapisa-Gandhara in modern-day Afghanistan, Zabulistan
and Sindh (which then held Makran) in modern-day Pakistan, all of
which were culturally and politically part of India since ancient
times, were known as "The Frontier of Al Hind". The first
clash between a ruler of an Indian kingdom and the Arabs took place
in 643 AD, when Arab forces defeated Rutbil, King of Zabulistan
in Sistan. Arabs led by Suhail b. Abdi and Hakam al Taghilbi defeated
an Indian army in the Battle of Rasil in 644 AD at the Indian Ocean
sea coast, then reached the Indus River. Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab
denied them permission to cross the river or operate on Indian soil
and the Arabs returned home.
Abdullah
ibn Aamir led the invasion of Khurasan in 650 AD, and his general
Rabi b. Ziyad Al Harithi attacked Sistan and took Zaranj and surrounding
areas in 651 AD while Ahnaf ibn Qais conquered the Hepthalites of
Herat in 652 AD and advanced up to Balkh by 653 AD. Arab conquests
now bordered the Kingdoms of Kapisa, Zabul and Sindh in modern-day
Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Arabs levied annual tributes on the
newly captured areas, and leaving 4,000 men garrisons at Merv and
Zaranj retired to Iraq instead of pushing on against the frontier
of India. Caliph Uthman b. Affan sanctioned an attack against Makran
in 652 AD, and sent a recon mission to Sindh in 653 AD. The mission
described Makran as inhospitable, and Caliph Uthman, probably assuming
the country beyond was much worse, forbade any further incursions
into India.
This
was the beginning of a prolonged struggle between the rulers of
Kabul and Zabul against successive Arab governors of Sistan, Khurasan
and Makran in modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Kabul Shahi
kings and their Zunbil kinsmen blocked access to the Khyber Pass
and Gomal Pass routes into India from 653 to 870 AD, while modern
Balochistan, Pakistan, comprising the areas of Kikan or Qiqanan,
Nukan, Turan, Buqan, Qufs, Mashkey and Makran, would face several
Arab expeditions between 661 - 711 AD. The Arabs launched several
raids against these frontier lands, but repeated rebellions in Sistan
and Khurasan between 653 - 691 AD diverted much of their military
resources in order to subdue these provinces and away from expansion
into Al Hind. Muslim control of these areas ebbed and flowed repeatedly
as a result until 870 AD. Arabs troops disliked being stationed
in Makran, and were reluctant to campaign in the Kabul area and
Zabulistan due to the difficult terrain and underestimation of Zunbil's
power. Arab strategy was tribute extraction instead of systematic
conquest. The fierce resistance of Zunbil and Turki Shah stalled
Arab progress repeatedly in the "Frontier Zone".
Umayyad
expansion in Al Hind :
Muawiyah established Umayyad rule over the Arabs after the first
First Fitna in 661 AD, and resumed expansion of the Muslim Empire.
After 663/665 AD, the Arabs launched an invasion against Kapisa,
Zabul and what is now Pakistani Balochistan. Abdur Rahman b. Samurra
besieged Kabul in 663 AD, while Haris b Marrah advanced against
Kalat after marching through Fannazabur and Quandabil and moving
through the Bolan Pass. King Chach of Sindh sent an army against
the Arabs, the enemy blocked the mountain passes, Haris was killed
and his army was annihilated. Al-Muhallab ibn Abi Sufra took a detachment
through the Khyber pass towards Multan in Southern Punjab in modern-day
Pakistan in 664 AD, then pushed south into Kikan, and may have also
raided Quandabil. Turki Shah and Zunbil expelled Arabs from their
respective kingdoms by 670 AD, and Zunbil began assisting in organizing
resistance in Makran.
Battles
in Makran and Zabulistan :
Arabs launched several campaigns in eastern Balochistan between
661 - 681 AD, four Arab commanders were killed during the campaigns,
but Sinan b. Salma managed to conquer parts of Makran including
the Chagai area, and establish a permanent base of operations in
673 AD. Rashid b. Amr, the next governor of Makran, subdued Mashkey
in 672 AD, Munzir b. Jarood Al Abadi managed to garrison Kikan and
conquer Buqan by 681 AD, while Ibn Harri Al Bahili, conducted several
campaigns to secure the Arab hold on Kikan, Makran and Buqan by
683 AD. Zunbil saw off Arab campaigns in 668, 672 and 673 AD by
paying tribute, although Arabs occupied the areas south of Helmand
in 673 AD permanently Zunbil defeated Yazid b. Salm's army in 681
AD at Junzah, and Arabs had to pay 500,000 dirhams to ransom their
prisoners, but the Arabs defeated and killed [vague] Zunbil in Sistan
in 685. The Arabs were defeated in Zabul in next invaded Zabul in
693 AD.
Al
Hajjaj and the East :
Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf Al Thaqifi, who had played a crucial role during
the Second Fitna for the Umayyad cause, was appointed the governor
of Iraq in 694 AD, further extended to Khurasan and Sistan in 697
AD. Al-Hajjaj also sponsored Muslim expansion in Makran, Sistan,
Transoxiana and Sindh.
Campaigns
in Makran and Zabul :
Arab hold on Makran had weakened when Arab rebels seized the province,
and Hajjaj had to send three governors between 694 - 707 AD before
Makran was partially recovered by 694 AD. Al Hajjaj also fought
Zunbil in 698 AD and 700 AD. The 20,000 strong army led by Ubaidullah
ibn Abu Bakra was trapped by the armies of Zunbil and Turki Shah
near Kabul, and lost 15,000 men to thirst and hunger, earning this
force the epithet of the "Doomed Army". Abd al-Rahman
ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash'ath led 20,000 troops each from Kufa and
Basra in a cautions but successful campaign in 700 AD, but when
he wanted to stop during winter, Al-Hajjaj's insulting rebuke led
to mutiny. The mutiny put down by 704 AD, and Al-Hajjaj granted
a 7-year truce to Zunbil.
Umayyad expansion in Sind and Multan :
Muhammad
bin Qasim's Campaigns in Sindh. A generic representation, not to
exact scale
Raja Dahir of Sindh had refused to return Arab rebels from
Sindh and furthermore, Meds and others. Meds shipping from their
bases at Kutch, Debal and Kathiawar. in one of their raids had kidnapped
Muslim women travelling from Sri Lanka to Arabia, thus providing
a casus belli against Sindh Raja Dahir when Raja Dahir expressed
his inability to help retrieve the prisoners. After two expeditions
were defeated in Sindh Al Hajjaj equipped an army built around 6,000
Syrian cavalry and detachments of mawali from Iraq, six thousand
camel riders, and a baggage train of 3,000 camels under his Nephew
Muhammad bin Qasim to Sindh. His Artillery of five catapults were
sent to Debal by sea ("manjaniks").
Conquest
of Sindh :
Muhammad bin Qasim departed from Shiraz in 710 CE, the army
marched along the coast to Tiaz in Makran, then to the Kech valley.
Muhammad re-subdued the restive towns of Fannazbur and Armabil,
(Lasbela) finally completing the conquest of Makran then the army
met up with the reinforcements and catapults sent by sea near Debal
and took Debal through assault. From Debal the Arabs moved north
along the Indus, clearing the region up to Budha, some towns like
Nerun and Sadusan (Sehwan) surrendered peacefully while tribes inhabiting
Sisam were defeated in battle. Muhammad bin Qasim moved back to
Nerun to resupply and receive reinforcements sent by Hajjaj. The
Arabs crossed the Indus further South and defeated the army of Dahir,
who was killed. The Arabs then marched north along the east bank
of the Indus after the siege and capture of Rawer. Brahmanabad,
then Alor (Aror) and finally Multan, were captured alongside other
in-between towns with only light Muslim casualties. Arabs marched
up to the foothills of Kashmir along the Jhelum in 713 AD, and the
stormed on Al-Kiraj (probably the Kangra valley) Muhammad was deposed
after the death of Caliph Walid in 715 AD. Jai Singh, son of Dahir
captured Brahmanabad and Arab rule was restricted to the Western
shore of Indus. Sindh was briefly lost to the caliph when the rebel
Yazid b. Muhallab took over Sindh briefly in 720 AD.
Last Umayyad campaigns in Al Hind :
Early
Arab conquest of what is now Pakistan by Muhammad bin Qasim for
Umayyad caliphate rule c. 711 CE
Junaid b. Abd Al Rahman Al Marri became the governor of Sindh in
723 AD. Secured Debal, then defeat and killed Jai Singh [failed
verification] secured Sindh and Southern Punjaband stormed Al Kiraj
(Kangra valley) in 724 AD. Junaid next attacked a number of Hindu
kingdoms in what is now Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh aiming
at permanent conquest, but the chronology and area of operation
of the campaigns during 725 - 743 AD is difficult to follow because
accurate, complete information is lacking. The Arabs moved east
from Sindh in several detachments and probably from attacked from
both the land and the sea, occupying Mirmad (Marumada, in Jaisalmer),
Al-Mandal (perhaps Okhamandal in Gujarat) or Marwar, and Dahnaj,
not identified, al-Baylaman (Bhilmal) and Jurz (Gurjara country—north
Gujarat and southern Rajasthan). and attacking Barwas (Broach),
sacking Vallabhi. Gurjara king Siluka repelled Arabs from "Stravani
and Valla", probably the area North of Jaisalmer and Jodhpur,
and the invasion of Malwa but were ultimately defeated by Bappa
Rawal and Nagabhata I in 725 AD near Ujjain. Arabs lost control
over the newly conquered territories and Sindh due to Arab tribal
infighting and Arab soldiers deserting the newly conquered territory
in 731 AD.
Al
Hakam b. Awana Al Kalbi recovered Sindh, and in c. 733 AD, founded
the garrison city of Al Mahfuza ("The Well Guarded") similar
to Kufa, Basra and Wasit, on the eastern side of a lake near Brahmanabad.
Hakam next attempted to reclaim the conquests of Junaid in Al Hind.
Arab records merely state that he was successful, Indian records
at Navasari details that Arab forces defeated "Kacchella, Saindhava,
Saurashtra, Cavotaka, Maurya and Gurjara" kings. The city of
Al Mansura ("The Victorious") was founded near Al Mahfuza
to commemorate pacification of Sindh by Amr b. Muhammad in c. 738
AD. Al Hakam next invaded the Deccan in 739 AD with the intention
of permanent conquest, but was decisively defeated at Navsari by
the viceroy Avanijanashraya Pulakeshin of the Chalukya Empire serving
Vikramaditya II. Arab rule was restricted to the west of Thar desert.
Last
days of Caliphate control :
When the Abbasid Revolution overthrew the Umayyads in 750 AD after
the Third Fitna, Sindh became independent and was captured by Musa
b. K'ab al Tamimi in 752 AD. Zunbil had defeated the Arabs in 728
AD, and saw off two Abbasid invasions in 769 and 785 AD. Abbasids
attacked Kabul several times and collected tribute between 787 AD
- 815 AD and extracted tribute after each campaign. Abbasid Governor
of Sindh, Hisham (7 in office 768 - 773 AD) raided Kashmir, recaptured
parts of Punjab from Karkota control, and launched naval raids against
ports of Gujarat in 758 and 770 AD, which like other Abbasid Naval
raids launched of 776 and 779 AD, gained no territory. Arabs occupied
Sindian (Southern Kutch) in 810 AD, only to lose it in 841 AD. Civil
war erupted in Sindh in 842 AD, and the Habbari dynasty occupied
Mansurah, and by 871, five independent principalities emerged, with
the Banu Habbari clan controlling in Mansurah, Banu Munabbih occupying
Multan, Banu Madan ruling in Makran, with Makshey and Turan falling
to other rulers, all outside direct Caliphate control. Ismaili missionaries
found a receptive audience among both the Sunni and non-Muslim populations
in Multan, which became a center of the Ismaili sect of Islam. The
Saffarid Dynasty of Zaranj occupied Kabul and the kingdom of Zunbil
permanently in 871 AD. A new chapter of Muslim conquests began when
the Samanid Dynasty took over the Saffarid Kingdom and Sabuktigin
seized Ghazni.
Later
Muslim invasions :
Muslim incursions resumed under later Turkic and Central Asian
dynasties like Saffarid Dynasty and Samanid Dynasty with more local
capitals, who supplanted the Caliphate and expanded their domains
both northwards and eastwards. Continues raids from these empires
in north-east of India led to the loss of stability in the Indian
kingdoms and led to establishment of Islam in the heart of India.
Ghaznavid
Empire :
Ghaznavid
Empire at its greatest extent in 1030 CE
Under Sabuktigin, Ghaznavid Empire found itself in conflict with
the Kabul Shahi Raja Jayapala in the east. When Sabuktigin died
and his son Mahmud ascended the throne in 998, Ghazni was engaged
in the North with the Qarakhanids when the Shahi Raja renewed hostilities
in east once again.
In
the early 11th century, Mahmud of Ghazni launched seventeen expeditions
into Indian subcontinent. In 1001, Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni defeated
Raja Jayapala of the Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Gandhara (in modern
Afghanistan), in the Battle of Peshawar and marched further west
of Peshawar (in modern Pakistan) and, in 1005, made it the center
for his forces.
Writing
c. 1030, Al Biruni reported on the devastation caused during the
conquest of Gandhara and much of northwest India by Mahmud of Ghazni
following his defeat of Jayapala in the Battle of Peshawar at Peshawar
in 1001 :
Now
in the following times no Muslim conqueror passed beyond the frontier
of Kabul and the river Sindh until the days of the Turks, when they
seized the power in Ghazna under the Sâmânî dynasty,
and the supreme power fell to the lot of Nasir-addaula Sabuktagin.
This prince chose the holy war as his calling, and therefore
called himself al-Ghazi ("the warrior/invader"). In
the interest of his successors he constructed, in order to weaken
the Indian frontier, those roads on which afterwards his son Yamin-addaula
Mahmud marched into India during a period of thirty years and more.
God be merciful to both father and son! Mahmud utterly ruined the
prosperity of the country, and performed there wonderful exploits,
by which the Hindus became like atoms of dust scattered in all directions,
and like a tale of old in the mouth of the people. Their scattered
remains cherish, of course, the most inveterate aversion towards
all Muslims. This is the reason, too, why Hindu sciences have retired
far away from those parts of the country conquered by us, and have
fled to places which our hand cannot yet reach, to Kashmir, Benares,
and other places. And there the antagonism between them and all
foreigners receives more and more nourishment both from political
and religious sources.
During
the closing years of the tenth and the early years of the succeeding
century of our era, Mahmud the first Sultan and Musalman of the
Turk dynasty of kings who ruled at Ghazni, made a succession of
inroads twelve or fourteen in number, into Gandhar – the present
Peshwar valley – in the course of his proselytizing invasions
of Hindustan.
Fire
and sword, havoc and destruction, marked his course everywhere.
Gandhar which was styled the Garden of the North was left at his
death a weird and desolate waste. Its rich fields and fruitful
gardens, together with the canal which watered them (the course
of which is still partially traceable in the western part of the
plain), had all disappeared. Its numerous stone built cities, monasteries,
and topes with their valuable and revered monuments and sculptures,
were sacked, fired, razed to the ground, and utterly destroyed as
habitations.
The
Ghaznavid conquests were initially directed against the Ismaili
Fatimids of Multan, who were engaged in an ongoing struggle with
the provinces of the Abbasid Caliphate in conjunction with their
compatriots of the Fatimid Caliphate in North Africa and the Middle
East; Mahmud apparently hoped to curry the favor of the Abbasids
in this fashion. However, once this aim was accomplished, he moved
onto the richness of the loot of Indian temples and monasteries.
By 1027, Mahmud had captured parts of North India and obtained formal
recognition of Ghazni's sovereignty from the Abbassid Caliph, al-Qadir
Billah.
Ghaznavid
rule in Northwestern India (modern Afghanistan and Pakistan) lasted
over 175 years, from 1010 to 1187. It was during this period that
Lahore assumed considerable importance apart from being the second
capital, and later the only capital, of the Ghaznavid Empire.
At
the end of his reign, Mahmud's empire extended from Kurdistan in
the west to Samarkand in the Northeast, and from the Caspian Sea
to the Punjab in the west. Although his raids carried his forces
across Northern and Western India, only Punjab came under his permanent
rule; Kashmir, the Doab, Rajasthan, and Gujarat remained nominal
under the control of the local Indian dynasties. In 1030, Mahmud
fell gravely ill and died at age 59. As with the invaders of three
centuries ago, Mahmud's armies reached temples in Varanasi, Mathura,
Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, Somnath and Dwarka.
Ghurid
Empire :
Map
of the Ghurid dynasty at its greatest extent in early 13th century
under Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad
Mu'izz al-Din better known as Shahab-ud-Din Muhammad Ghori was a
conqueror from the region of Ghor in modern Afghanistan. Before
1160, the Ghaznavid Empire covered an area running from central
Iran east to the Punjab, with capitals at Ghazni on the banks of
Ghazni river in present-day Afghanistan, and at Lahore in present-day
Pakistan. In 1160, the Ghurids conquered Ghazni from the Ghaznavids,
and in 1173 Muhammad Bin Sam was made governor of Ghazni. In 1186
and 1187 he conquered Lahore in alliance with a local Hindu ruler,
ending the Ghaznavid empire and bringing the last of Ghaznavid territory
under his control, and seemed to be the first Muslim ruler seriously
interested in expanding his domain in the sub-continent, and like
his predecessor Mahmud initially started off against the Ismaili
kingdom of Multan that had regained independence during the Nizari
conflicts, and then onto booty and power.
In
1191, he invaded the territory of Prithviraj III of Ajmer, who ruled
his territory from Delhi to Ajmer in present-day Rajasthan, but
was defeated at the First Battle of Tarain. The following year,
Mu'izz al-Din assembled 120,000 horsemen and once again invaded
India. Mu'izz al-Din's army met Prithviraj's army again at Tarain,
and this time Mu'izz al-Din won; Govindraj was slain, Prithviraj
executed and Mu'izz al-Din advanced onto Delhi. Within a year, Mu'izz
al-Din controlled North-Western Rajasthan and Northern Ganges-Yamuna
Doab. After these victories in India, and Mu'izz al-Din's establishment
Delhi as the capital of his Indian provinces, Multan was also incorporated
as a major part of his empire. Mu'izz al-Din then returned east
to Ghazni to deal with the threat on his eastern frontiers from
the Turks of the Khwarizmian Empire, whiles his armies continued
to advance through Northern India, raiding as far as Bengal.
Mu'izz
al-Din returned to Lahore after 1200. In 1206, Mu'izz al-Din had
to travel to Lahore to crush a revolt. On his way back to Ghazni,
his caravan rested at Damik near Sohawa (which is near the city
of Jhelum in the Punjab province of modern-day Pakistan). He was
assassinated on 15 March 1206, while offering his evening prayers.
The identity of Ghori's assassins is disputed, with some claiming
that he was assassinated by local Hindu Gakhars and others claiming
he was assassinated by Hindu Khokhars, both being different tribes.
The
Khokhars were killed in large numbers, and the province was pacified.
After settling the affairs in the Punjab. Mu'izz al-Din marched
back to Ghazni. While camping at Dhamayak in 1206 AD in the Jehlum
district, the sultan was murdered by the Khokhars.
Some
claim that Mu'izz al-Din was assassinated by the Hashshashin, a
radical Ismaili Muslim sect.
According
to his wishes, Mu'izz al-Din was buried where he fell, in Damik.
Upon his death his most capable general, Qutb-ud-din Aybak, took
control of Mu'izz al-Din's Indian provinces and declared himself
the first Sultan of Delhi Sultanate. [citation needed]
Delhi
Sultanate :
Delhi
Sultanate reached its zenith under the Turko-Indian Tughlaq dynasty
Muhammad's successors established the first dynasty of the Delhi
Sultanate, while the Mamluk Dynasty in 1211 (however, the Delhi
Sultanate is traditionally held to have been founded in 1206) seized
the reins of the empire. Mamluk means "slave" and referred
to the Turkic slave soldiers who became rulers. The territory under
control of the Muslim rulers in Delhi expanded rapidly. By mid-century,
Bengal and much of central India was under the Delhi Sultanate.
Several Turko-Afghan dynasties ruled from Delhi: the Mamluk (1206–1290),
the Khalji (1290–1320), the Tughlaq (1320–1414), the
Sayyid (1414–51), and the Lodhi (1451–1526). During
the time of Delhi Sultanate, the Vijayanagara Empire resisted successfully
attempts of Delhi Sultanate to establish dominion in the Southern
India, serving as a barrier against invasion by the Muslims. Certain
kingdoms remained independent of Delhi such as the larger kingdoms
of Punjab, Rajasthan, parts of the Deccan, Gujarat, Malwa (central
India), and Bengal, nevertheless all of the area in present-day
Pakistan came under the rule of Delhi.
The
image, in the chapter on India in Hutchison's Story of the Nations
edited by James Meston, depicts the Bakhtiyar Khilji's massacre
of Buddhist monks in Bihar, India. Khilji destroyed the Nalanda
and Vikramshila universities during his raids across North Indian
plains, massacring many Buddhist and Brahmin scholars.
The Sultans of Delhi enjoyed cordial, if superficial, relations
with Muslim rulers in the Near East but owed them no allegiance.
They based their laws on the Quran and the sharia and permitted
non-Muslim subjects to practice their religion only if they paid
the jizya (poll tax). They ruled from urban centres, while military
camps and trading posts provided the nuclei for towns that sprang
up in the countryside.
Perhaps
the most significant contribution of the Sultanate was its temporary
success in insulating the subcontinent from the potential devastation
of the Mongol invasion from Central Asia in the 13th century, which
nonetheless led to the capture of Afghanistan and western Pakistan
by the Mongols (see the Ilkhanate Dynasty). Under the Sultanate,
"Indo-Muslim" fusion left lasting monuments in architecture,
music, literature, and religion. In addition it is surmised that
the language of Urdu (literally meaning "horde" or "camp"
in various Turkic dialects) was born during the Delhi Sultanate
period as a result of the mingling of Sanskritic Hindi and the Persian,
Turkish, Arabic favoured by the Muslim invaders of India [citation
needed].
The
Sultanate suffered significantly from the sacking of Delhi in 1398
by Timur, but revived briefly under the Lodi Dynasty, the final
dynasty of the Sultanate before it was conquered by Zahiruddin Babur
in 1526, who subsequently founded the Mughal Dynasty that ruled
from the 16th to the 18th centuries.
Timur
:
Timur bin Taraghay Barlas, known in the West as Tamerlane or "Timur
the lame", was a 14th-century warlord of Turco-Mongol descent,
conqueror of much of western and central Asia, and founder of the
Timurid Empire (1370–1507) in Central Asia; the Timurid dynasty
survived until 1857 as the Mughal dynasty of India.
Timur
defeats the Sultan of Delhi, Nasir-u Din Mehmud, in the winter of
1397–1398
Informed about civil war in South Asia, Timur began a trek starting
in 1398 to invade the reigning Sultan Nasir-u Din Mehmud of the
Tughlaq Dynasty in the north Indian city of Delhi. His campaign
was politically pretexted that the Muslim Delhi Sultanate was too
tolerant toward its "Hindu" subjects, but that could not
mask the real reason being to amass the wealth of the Delhi Sultanate.
Timur
crossed the Indus River at Attock (now Pakistan) on 24 September.
In Haryana, his soldiers each killed 50 to 100 Hindus.
Timur's
invasion did not go unopposed and he did meet some resistance during
his march to Delhi, most notably with the Sarv Khap coalition in
northern India, and the Governor of Meerut. Although impressed and
momentarily stalled by the valour of Ilyaas Awan, Timur was able
to continue his relentless approach to Delhi, arriving in 1398 to
combat the armies of Sultan Mehmud, already weakened by an internal
battle for ascension within the royal family.
The
Sultan's army was easily defeated on 17 December 1398. Timur entered
Delhi and the city was sacked, destroyed, and left in ruins. Before
the battle for Delhi, Timur executed more than 100,000 "Hindu"
captives.
Timur
himself recorded the invasions in his memoirs, collectively known
as Tuzk-i-Timuri. Timur's purported autobiography, the Tuzk-e-Taimuri
("Memoirs of Temur") is a later fabrication, although
most of the historical facts are accurate.
Muslim
historian Irfan Habib writes in "Timur in the Political Tradition
and Historiography of Mughal India" that in the 14th century,
the word "Hindu" (people of "Al-Hind", "Hind"
being "India") included "both Hindus and Muslims"
in religious connotations.
When Timur entered Delhi after defeating Mahmud Toghloq's forces,
he granted an amnesty in return for protection money (mâl-e
amâni). But on the fourth day he ordered that all the people
of the city be enslaved; and so they were. Thus reports Yahya, who
here inserts a pious prayer in Arabic for the victims’ consolation
("To God we return, and everything happens by His will").
Yazdi, on the other hand, does not have any sympathy to waste on
these wretches. He records that Timur had granted protection to
the people of Delhi on the 18th of December 1398, and the collectors
had begun collecting the protection money. But large groups of Timur's
soldiers began to enter the city and, like birds of prey, attacked
its citizens. The "pagan Hindus" (Henduân-e gabr)
having had the temerity to begin immolating their women and themselves,
the three cities of Delhi were put to sack by Timur's soldiers.
"Faithless Hindus", he adds, had gathered in the Congregation
Mosque of Old Delhi and Timur's officers put them ruthlessly to
slaughter there on the 29th of December. Clearly, Yazdi's "Hindus"
included Muslims as well. [clarification needed]
However,
that does not prove that the men gathering at the mosque were Muslims
as it could have been Hindus who gathered at the Mosque for protection.
The
statement implying that Muslims were targeted during the Delhi massacre
was contradicted by Timur's own words, during the 15 day massacre
of Delhi, Timur himself stated that "Excepting the quarters
of the sayyids, the 'ulama and the other Musalmans (Muslims), the
whole city was sacked", proving that Timur differentiated
between the two religious groups (Muslims and Hindus).
During
the mass murder of Delhi, Timur's soldiers massacred more than 150,000
Indians, and all inhabitants not killed were captured and enslaved.
[citation needed]
Timur's
memoirs on his invasion of India describe in detail the massacre
of "Hindus", looting plundering and raping of their women
and the plunder of the wealth of Hindustan (Greater India). It gives
details of how villages, towns and entire cities were rid of their
"Hindu" male population through systematic mass slaughters
and genocide.
Timur
left Delhi in approximately January 1399. In April he had returned
to his own capital beyond the Oxus (Amu Darya). Immense quantities
of spoils were taken from India. According to Ruy Gonzáles
de Clavijo, 90 captured elephants were employed merely to carry
precious stones looted from his conquest, so as to erect a mosque
at Samarkand — what historians today believe is the enormous
Bibi-Khanym Mosque. Ironically, the mosque was constructed too quickly
and suffered greatly from disrepair within a few decades of its
construction.
Regional sultanates :
Kashmir was conquered by the Shah Mir dynasty in the 14th century.
Regional kingdoms such as Bengal, Gujarat, Malwa, Khandesh, Jaunpur,
and Bahmanis expanded at the expense of the Delhi Sultanate. Gaining
conversions to Islam was easier under regional Sultanates.
Deccan
Sultanates :
Map
of five Deccan Sultanates before Battle of Talikota
The term of Deccan Sultanates was used for five Muslim dynasties
that ruled several late medieval Indian kingdoms, namely Bijapur
Sultanate, Golkonda Sultanate, Ahmadnagar Sultanate, Bidar Sultanate,
and Berar Sultanate in South India. The Deccan Sultanates ruled
the Deccan Plateau between the Krishna River and the Vindhya Range.
These sultanates became independent during the break-up of the Bahmani
Sultanate, another Muslim empire.
Victory
of Deccan Sultanates in Battle of Talikota
The ruling families of all these five sultanates were of diverse
origin; the Qutb Shahi dynasty of Golconda Sultanate was of Turkmen
origin, the Barid Shahi dynasty of Bidar Sultanate being founded
by a Turkic noble, the Adil Shahi dynasty of Bijapur Sultanate was
founded by a Georgian-Oghuz Turkic slave while Nizam Shahi dynasty
of Ahmadnagar Sultanate and Imad Shahi dynasty of Berar Sultanate
were of Hindu lineage (Ahmadnagar being Brahmin and Berar being
Kanarese).
Mughal
Empire :
The Mughal Empire at its greatest extent in early 18th century
India in the early 16th century presented a fragmented picture of
rulers who lacked concern for their subjects and failed to create
a common body of laws or institutions.[citation needed] Outside
developments also played a role in shaping events. The circumnavigation
of Africa by the Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama in 1498 allowed
Europeans to challenge Muslim control of the trading routes between
Europe and Asia. In Central Asia and Afghanistan, shifts in power
pushed Babur of the Timurid Dynasty (in present-day Uzbekistan)
southward, first to Kabul and then to the heart of Indian subcontinent.
The dynasty he founded endured for more than three centuries.
The
Mughal Emperor Akbar shoots the Rajput warrior Jaimal during the
Siege of Chittorgarh in 1567
Bullocks
dragging siege-guns up hill during Mughal Emperor Akbar's attack
on Ranthambhor Fort in 1568
The
Mughal Army commanded by Akbar attack members of the Sannyasa during
the Battle of Thanesar
Mughal
Emperor Akbar attempts to dissuade the young Hindu girl from committing
sati
The
Mughal Emperor Akbar fights Pehlwani with his Hindu general Raja
Man Singh I of Jaipur
Rajput
women committing Jauhar during Akbar's invasion
A
War elephant executing the opponents of the Emperor Akbar the Great
Babur
:
Babur
and the Mughal Army at the Urvah valley in Gwalior
A descendant of both Genghis Khan and Timur the Great, Babur combined
strength and courage with a love of beauty, and military ability
with cultivation. He concentrated on gaining control of Northwestern
India, doing so in 1526 by defeating the last Lodhi Sultan at the
First battle of Panipat, a town north of Delhi. Babur then turned
to the tasks of persuading his Central Asian followers to stay on
in India and of overcoming other contenders for power, like the
Rajputs and the Afghans. He succeeded in both tasks but died shortly
thereafter in 1530. The Mughal Empire was one of the largest centralised
states in premodern history and was the precursor to the British
Indian Empire.
Babur
was followed by his great-grandson, Shah Jahan (r. 1628–58),
builder of the Taj Mahal and other magnificent buildings. Two other
towering figures of the Mughal era were Akbar (r. 1556–1605)
and Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707). Both rulers expanded the empire
greatly and were able administrators. However, Akbar was known for
his religious tolerance and administrative genius while Aurangzeb
was a pious Muslim and fierce advocate of more orthodox Islam.
Aurangzeb
:
The Mughal Empire in 1700
While some rulers were zealous in their spread of Islam, others
were relatively liberal. The Mughal emperor Akbar, an example of
the latter established a new religion, Din E Elahi, which included
beliefs from different faiths and even build many temples in his
empire. He abolished the jizya twice. In contrast, his great-grandson
Aurangazeb was a more religious and orthodox ruler.
In
the century-and-a-half that followed the death of Aurangzeb, effective
Muslim control started weakening. Succession to imperial and even
provincial power, which had often become hereditary, was subject
to intrigue and force. The mansabdari system gave way to the zamindari
system, in which high-ranking officials took on the appearance of
hereditary landed aristocracy with powers of collecting rents. As
Delhi's control waned, other contenders for power emerged and clashed,
thus preparing the way for the eventual British takeover.
Durrani
Empire :
Ahmad Shah Durrani and his coalition defeated the Maratha
Empire, during the Third Battle of Panipat and restored the Mughal
emperor Shah Alam II
Ahmed Shah Abdali – a Pashtun – embarked on a conquest
in South Asia starting in 1747. In the short space of just over
a quarter of a century, he forged one of the largest Muslim empires
of the 18th century after the Ottomans and Qajars of Iran. The high
point of his conquests was his victory over the powerful Marathas
in the third Battle of Panipat 1761. In the Indian subcontinent,
his empire stretched from the Indus at Attock all the way to the
eastern Punjab. Uninterested in long-term of conquest or in replacing
the Mughal Empire, he became increasingly pre occupied with revolts
by the Sikhs. Sikh holocaust of 1762 took place under the Muslim
provincial government based at Lahore to wipe out the Sikhs, with
30,000 Sikhs being killed, an offensive that had begun with the
Mughals, with the Sikh holocaust of 1746, and lasted several decades
under its Muslim successor states. His empire started to unravel
not longer than a few decades after his death.
Decline
of Muslim rule in Indian subcontinent
Maratha Empire :
Maratha
Empire at its zenith in 1760 (yellow area) stretching from the Deccan
to present-day Pakistan. The Marathas even discussed abolishing
the Mughal throne and placing Vishwasrao Peshwa on the Mughal imperial
throne in Delhi.
There is no doubt that the single most important power to emerge
in the long twilight of the Mughal dynasty was the Maratha Confederacy
(1674 CE - 1818 CE). The Marathas are responsible, to a large extent,
for ending Mughal rule in India. The Maratha Empire ruled large
parts of India following the decline of the Mughals. The long and
futile war bankrupted one of the most powerful empires in the world.
Mountstart Elphinstone termed this a demoralizing period for the
Muslims as many of them lost the will to fight against the Maratha
Empire. Maratha empire at its peak stretched from Tamil Nadu (Trichinopoly)
"present Tiruchirappalli" in the south to the Afghan border
in the north. In early 1771, Mahadji, a notable Maratha general,
recaptured Delhi and installed Shah Alam II as the puppet ruler
on the Mughal throne. In north India, the Marathas thus regained
the territory and the prestige lost as result of the defeat at Panipath
in 1761. However regions of Kashmir, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Western
Punjab, were captured by Marathas between 1758 and 1759, remained
in Afghan rule before ascension of Sikh power. Mahadji ruled the
Punjab as it used to be a Mughal territory and Sikh sardars and
other Rajas of the cis-Sutlej region paid tributes to him. A considerable
portion of the Indian subcontinent came under the sway of the British
Empire after the Third Anglo-Maratha War, which ended the Maratha
Empire in 1818.
Sikh Empire :
Sikh
Empire, established by Ranjit Singh in North-west India
In northwest India, in the Punjab, Sikhs developed themselves into
a powerful force under the authority of twelve Misls. By 1801, Ranjit
Singh captured Lahore and threw off the Afghan yoke from North West
India. In Afghanistan Zaman Shah Durrani was defeated by powerful
Barakzai chief Fateh Khan who appointed Mahmud Shah Durrani as the
new ruler of Afghanistan and appointed himself as Wazir of Afghanistan.
Sikhs however were now superior to the Afghans and started to annex
Afghan provinces. The biggest victory of the Sikh Empire over the
Durrani Empire came in the Battle of Attock fought in 1813 between
Sikh and Wazir of Afghanistan Fateh Khan and his younger brother
Dost Mohammad Khan. The Afghans were routed by the Sikh army and
the Afghans lost over 9,000 soldiers in this battle. Dost Mohammad
was seriously injured whereas his brother Wazir Fateh Khan fled
back to Kabul fearing that his brother was dead. In 1818 they slaughtered
Afghans and Muslims in trading city of Multan killing Afghan governor
Nawab Muzzafar Khan and five of his sons in the Siege of Multan.
In 1819 the last Indian Province of Kashmir was conquered by Sikhs
who registered another crushing victory over weak Afghan General
Jabbar Khan. The Koh-i-Noor diamond was also taken by Maharaja Ranjit
Singh in 1814. In 1823 a Sikh Army routed Dost Mohammad Khan the
Sultan of Afghanistan and his brother Azim Khan at Naushera (Near
Peshawar). By 1834 the Sikh Empire extended up to the Khyber Pass.
Hari Singh Nalwa the Sikh general remained the governor of Khyber
Agency till his death in 1837. He consolidated Sikh hold in tribal
provinces. The northernmost Indian territories of Gilgit, Baltistan
and Ladakh was annexed between 1831-1840.
Impact
on India, Islam and Muslims in India :
Will Durant, a famous historian, wrote about medieval India,
"The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story
in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is
that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of
order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown
by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within."
Conversion
theories :
Considerable controversy exists both in scholarly and public opinion
as to how conversion to Islam came about in Indian subcontinent,
typically represented by the following schools of thought :
1.
Conversion was a combination, initially by violence, threat or other
pressure against the person.
2. As a socio-cultural process of diffusion and integration over
an extended period of time into the sphere of the dominant Muslim
civilization and global polity at large.
3. That conversions occurred for non-religious reasons of pragmatism
and patronage such as social mobility among the Muslim ruling elite
4 . That the bulk of Muslims are descendants of migrants from the
Iranian plateau or Arabs.
5. Conversion was a result of the actions of Sufi saints and involved
a genuine change of heart.
Hindus who converted to Islam however were not completely immune
to persecution due to the caste system among Muslims in India established
by Ziauddin al-Barani in the Fatawa-i Jahandari, where they were
regarded as an "Ajlaf" caste and subjected to discrimination
by the "Ashraf" castes. Critics of the "religion
of the sword theory" point to the presence of the strong Muslim
communities found in Southern India, modern day Bangladesh, Sri
Lanka, western Burma, Indonesia and the Philippines coupled with
the distinctive lack of equivalent Muslim communities around the
heartland of historical Muslim empires in South Asia as refutation
to the "conversion by the sword theory". The legacy of
Muslim conquest of South Asia is a hotly debated issue even today.
Not all Muslim invaders were simply raiders. Later rulers fought
on to win kingdoms and stayed to create new ruling dynasties. The
practices of these new rulers and their subsequent heirs (some of
whom were born of Hindu wives of Muslim rulers) varied considerably.
While some were uniformly hated, others developed a popular following.
According to the memoirs of Ibn Battuta who traveled through Delhi
in the 14th century, one of the previous sultans had been especially
brutal and was deeply hated by Delhi's population. His memoirs also
indicate that Muslims from the Arab world, Persia and Turkey were
often favored with important posts at the royal courts suggesting
that locals may have played a somewhat subordinate role in the Delhi
administration. The term "Turk" was commonly used to refer
to their higher social status.[citation needed] However S.A.A. Rizvi
points to Muhammad bin Tughlaq as not only encouraging locals but
promoting artisan groups such as cooks, barbers and gardeners to
high administrative posts. In his reign, it is likely that conversions
to Islam took place as a means of seeking greater social mobility
and improved social standing.
Aurangzeb
:
Aurangzeb's Deccan campaign saw one of the largest death tolls in
South Asian history, with an estimated 4.6 million people killed
during his reign, Muslims and Hindus alike. An estimated of 2.5
million of Aurangzeb's army were killed during the Mughal–Maratha
Wars (100,000 annually during a quarter-century), while 2 million
civilians in war-torn lands died due to drought, plague and famine.
Expansion
of trade :
Cheraman
Juma Masjid in Kerala
Islam's impact was the most notable in the expansion of trade. The
first contact of Muslims with India was the Arab attack on a nest
of pirates near modern-day Mumbai to safeguard their trade in the
Arabian Sea. Around the same time many Arabs settled at Indian ports,
giving rise to small Muslim communities. The growth of these communities
was not only due to conversion but also the fact that many Hindu
kings of south India (such as those from Cholas) hired Muslims as
mercenaries.
A
significant aspect of the Muslim period in world history was the
emergence of Islamic Sharia courts capable of imposing a common
commercial and legal system that extended from Morocco in the West
to Mongolia in the North East and Indonesia in the South East. While
southern India was already in trade with Arabs/Muslims, northern
India found new opportunities. As the Hindu and Buddhist kingdoms
of Asia were subjugated by Islam, and as Islam spread through Africa
– it became a highly centralising force that facilitated in
the creation of a common legal system that allowed letters of credit
issued in say Egypt or Tunisia to be honoured in India or Indonesia
(The Sharia has laws on the transaction of business with both Muslims
and non-Muslims [citation needed]). In order to cement their rule,
Muslim rulers initially promoted a system in which there was a revolving
door between the clergy, the administrative nobility and the mercantile
classes. The travels of explorer Muhammad Ibn-Abdullah Ibn-Batuta
were eased because of this system. He served as an Imam in Delhi,
as a judicial official in the Maldives, and as an envoy and trader
in the Malabar. There was never a contradiction in any of his positions
because each of these roles complemented the other. Islam created
a compact under which political power, law and religion became fused
in a manner so as to safeguard the interests of the mercantile class.
This led world trade to expand to the maximum extent possible in
the medieval world. Sher Shah Suri took initiatives in improvement
of trade by abolishing all taxes which hindered progress of free
trade. He built large networks of roads and constructed Grand Trunk
Road (1540–1544), which connects Chittagong to Kabul. Parts
of it are still in use today. The geographic regions add to the
diversity of languages and politics.
Cultural
influence :
The divide and rule policies, two-nation theory, and subsequent
partition of India in the wake of Independence from the British
Empire has polarised the sub-continental psyche, making objective
assessment hard in comparison to the other settled agricultural
societies of India from the North West. Muslim rule differed from
these others in the level of assimilation and syncretism that occurred.
They retained their identity and introduced legal and administrative
systems that superseded existing systems of social conduct and ethics.
While this was a source of friction it resulted in a unique experience
the legacy of which is a Muslim community strongly Islamic in character
while at the same time distinctive and unique among its peers.
The
impact of Islam on Indian culture has been inestimable. It permanently
influenced the development of all areas of human endeavour –
language, dress, cuisine, all the art forms, architecture and urban
design, and social customs and values. Conversely, the languages
of the Muslim invaders were modified by contact with local languages,
to Urdu, which uses the Arabic script. This language was also known
as Hindustani, an umbrella term used for the vernacular terminology
of Hindi as well as Urdu, both major languages in South Asia today
derived primarily from Sanskrit grammatical structures and vocabulary.
Muslim
rule saw a greater urbanisation of India and the rise of many cities
and their urban cultures. The biggest impact was upon trade resulting
from a common commercial and legal system extending from Morocco
to Indonesia. This change of emphasis on mercantilism and trade
from the more strongly centralised governance systems further clashed
with the agricultural based traditional economy and also provided
fuel for social and political tensions.
A
related development to the shifting economic conditions was the
establishment of Karkhanas, or small factories and the import and
dissemination of technology through India and the rest of the world.
The use of ceramic tiles was adopted from architectural traditions
of Iraq, Iran, and Central Asia. Rajasthan's blue pottery was a
local variation of imported Chinese pottery. There is also the example
of Sultan Abidin (1420–70) sending Kashmiri artisans to Samarqand
to learn book-binding and paper making. Khurja and Siwan became
renowned for pottery, Moradabad for brass ware, Mirzapur for carpets,
Firozabad for glass wares, Farrukhabad for printing, Sahranpur and
Nagina for wood-carving, Bidar and Lucknow for bidriware, Srinagar
for papier-mache, Benaras for jewellery and textiles, and so on.
On the flip-side encouraging such growth also resulted in higher
taxes on the peasantry.
Numerous
Indian scientific and mathematical advances and the Hindu numerals
were spread to the rest of the world and much of the scholarly work
and advances in the sciences of the age under Muslim nations across
the globe were imported by the liberal patronage of Arts and Sciences
by the rulers. The languages brought by Islam were modified by contact
with local languages leading to the creation of several new languages,
such as Urdu, which uses the modified Arabic script, but with more
Persian words. The influences of these languages exist in several
dialects in India today.
Islamic
and Mughal architecture and art is widely noticeable in India, examples
being the Taj Mahal and Jama Masjid. At the same time, Muslim rulers
destroyed most of the ancient Indian architectural marvels and converted
them into Islamic structures, most notably at Varanasi, Mathura,
Ayodhya and the Kutub Complex in New Delhi.
Migration
of Hindus :
Copper
Inscription by one of the Baise (22) King of Doti, Raika Mandhata
Shahi on Saka Era, 1612 CE
Few groups of Hindus including Rajputs were entering what is today
Nepal before the fall of Chittor due to regular invasions of Muslims
in India. After the fall of Chittorgarh in 1303 by the Alauddin
Khilji of the Khalji dynasty, Rajputs from the region immigrated
in large groups into what is today Nepal due to heavy religious
persecution. The incident is supported by both the Rajput and Nepalese
traditions. Indian scholar Rahul Ram asserts that the Rajput immigration
into what is today Nepal is an undoubted fact but there can be questions
in purity of blood of some leading families. Historian James
Todd mentions that there was a one Rajasthani tradition that mentions
the immigration of Rajputs from Mewar to Himalayas in the late 12th
century after the battle between Chittor and Muhammad Ghori. Historian
John T Hitchcock and John Whelpton contends that the regular invasions
by Muslims led to heavy influx of Rajputs with Brahmins from the
12th century.
The
entry of Rajputs in central region of what is today Nepal were easily
assisted by Khas Malla rulers who had developed a large feudatory
state covering more than half of the Greater Nepal. The Hindu immigrants
including Rajputs were mixed into the Khas society quickly as a
result of much resemblance. Also, the Magar tribesmen of the
Western region of what is today Nepal welcomed the immigrant Rajput
chiefs with much cordiality.
Iconoclasm
Iconoclasm under the Delhi Sultanate :
Kakatiya
Kala Thoranam (Warangal Gate) built by the Kakatiya dynasty in ruins;
one of the many temple complexes destroyed by the Delhi Sultanate
Artistic
rendition of the Kirtistambh at Rudra Mahalaya Temple. The temple
was destroyed by Alauddin Khalji
Rani
ki vav is a stepwell, built by the Chaulukya dynasty, located in
Patan; the city was sacked by Sultan of Delhi Qutb-ud-din Aybak
between 1200 and 1210, and it was destroyed by the Allauddin Khilji
in 1298. [citation needed]
Pillar
and ceiling carvings with a damaged madanakai at Hoysaleswara Temple.
The temple was twice sacked and plundered by the Delhi Sultanate.
Historian Richard Eaton has tabulated a campaign of destruction
of idols and temples by Delhi Sultans, intermixed with instances
of years where the temples were protected from desecration. In his
paper, he has listed 37 instances of Hindu temples being desecrated
or destroyed in India during the Delhi Sultanate, from 1234 to 1518,
for which reasonable evidences are available. He notes that this
was not unusual in medieval India, as there were numerous recorded
instances of temple desecration by Hindu and Buddhist kings against
rival Indian kingdoms between 642 and 1520, involving conflict between
devotees of different Hindu deities, as well as between Hindus,
Buddhists and Jains.
He also noted there were also many instances of Delhi sultans, who
often had Hindu ministers, ordering the protection, maintenance
and repairing of temples, according to both Muslim and Hindu sources.
For example, a Sanskrit inscription notes that Sultan Muhammad bin
Tughluq repaired a Siva temple in Bidar after his Deccan conquest.
There was often a pattern of Delhi sultans plundering or damaging
temples during conquest, and then patronizing or repairing temples
after conquest. This pattern came to an end with the Mughal Empire,
where Akbar the Great's chief minister Abu'l-Fazl criticized the
excesses of earlier sultans such as Mahmud of Ghazni.
In
many cases, the demolished remains, rocks and broken statue pieces
of temples destroyed by Delhi sultans were reused to build mosques
and other buildings. For example, the Qutb complex in Delhi was
built from stones of 27 demolished Hindu and Jain temples by some
accounts. Similarly, the Muslim mosque in Khanapur, Maharashtra
was built from the looted parts and demolished remains of Hindu
temples. Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji destroyed Buddhist and Hindu
libraries and their manuscripts at Nalanda and Odantapuri Universities
in 1193 AD at the beginning of the Delhi Sultanate.
The
first historical record in this period of a campaign of destruction
of temples and defacement of faces or heads of Hindu idols lasted
from 1193 through 1194 in Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh
under the command of Ghuri. Under the Mamluks and Khaljis, the campaign
of temple desecration expanded to Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat
and Maharashtra, and continued through the late 13th century. The
campaign extended to Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil
Nadu under Malik Kafur and Ulugh Khan in the 14th century, and by
the Bahmanis in 15th century. Orissa temples were destroyed in the
14th century under the Tughlaqs.
Beyond
destruction and desecration, the sultans of the Delhi Sultanate
in some cases had forbidden reconstruction of damaged Hindu, Jain
and Buddhist temples, and they prohibited repairs of old temples
or construction of any new temples. In certain cases, the Sultanate
would grant a permit for repairs and construction of temples if
the patron or religious community paid jizya (fee, tax). For example,
a proposal by the Chinese to repair Himalayan Buddhist temples destroyed
by the Sultanate army was refused, on the grounds that such temple
repairs were only allowed if the Chinese agreed to pay jizya tax
to the treasury of the Sultanate. In his memoirs, Firoz Shah Tughlaq
describes how he destroyed temples and built mosques instead and
killed those who dared build new temples. Other historical records
from wazirs, amirs and the court historians of various Sultans of
the Delhi Sultanate describe the grandeur of idols and temples they
witnessed in their campaigns and how these were destroyed and desecrated.
Nalanda
:
In 1193, the Nalanda University complex was destroyed by Afghan
Khalji-Ghilzai Muslims under Bakhtiyar Khalji; this event is seen
as the final milestone in the decline of Buddhism in India. He also
burned Nalanda's major Buddhist library and Vikramshila University,
as well as numerous Buddhist monasteries in India. When the Tibetan
translator, Chag Lotsawa Dharmasvamin (Chag Lo-tsa-ba, 1197–1264),
visited northern India in 1235, Nalanda was damaged, looted, and
largely deserted, but still standing and functioning with seventy
students.
Mahabodhi,
Sompura, Vajrasan and other important monasteries were found to
be untouched. The Ghuri ravages only afflicted those monasteries
that lay in the direct of their advance and were fortified in the
manner of defensive forts.
By
the end of the 12th century, following the Muslim conquest of the
Buddhist stronghold in Bihar, Buddhism, having already declined
in the South, declined in the North as well because survivors retreated
to Nepal, Sikkim and Tibet or escaped to the South of the Indian
sub-continent.
Martand
:
Ruins of the Surya Temple at Martand, which was destroyed
due to the iconoclastic policies of Sikandar Butshikan, photo taken
by John Burke in 1868
The Martand Sun Temple was built by the third ruler of the Karkota
Dynasty, Lalitaditya Muktapida, in the 8th century CE. The temple
was completely destroyed on the orders of the Muslim ruler Sikandar
Butshikan in the early 15th century, with demolition lasting a year.
He ruled from 1389 to 1413 and is remembered for his strenuous efforts
to convert the Hindus of Kashmir to Islam. These efforts included
the destruction of numerous old temples, such as Martand, prohibition
of Hindu rites, rituals and festivals and even the wearing of clothes
in the Hindu style. He is known as "Butcher of Kashmir"
and among the most hated figures among Kashmiri Hindus.
Vijayanagar
:
The city flourished between the 14th century and 16th century, during
the height of the Vijayanagar Empire. During this time, it was often
in conflict with the kingdoms which rose in the Northern Deccan,
and which are often collectively termed the Deccan Sultanates. The
Vijaynagar Empire successfully resisted Muslim invasions for centuries.
But in 1565, the empire's armies suffered a massive and catastrophic
defeat at the hands of an alliance of the Sultanates, and the capital
was taken. The victorious armies then razed, depopulated and destroyed
the city over several months. The empire continued its slow decline,
but the original capital was not reoccupied or rebuilt.
Somnath
:
Around 1024 CE, during the reign of Bhima I, Mahmud of Ghazni
raided Gujarat, and plundered the Somnath temple. According
to an 1169 CE inscription, Bhima rebuilt the temple. This inscription
does not mention any destruction caused by Mahmud, and states that
the temple had "decayed due to time". In 1299, Alauddin
Khalji's army under the leadership of Ulugh Khan defeated Karandev
II of the Vaghela dynasty, and sacked the Somnath temple. The temple
was rebuilt by Mahipala Deva, the Chudasama king of Saurashtra in
1308. It was repeatedly attacked in the later centuries, including
by the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. In 1665, the temple, was once again
ordered to be destroyed by Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. In 1702, he
ordered that if Hindus had revived worship there, it should be demolished
completely.
Ruins
of Nalanda University
Sri
Krishna Temple in Hampi
Somnath temple in ruins, 1869
Front view of the present Somnath Temple
The Somnath temple was first attacked by Muslim Turkic invader Mahmud
of Ghazni and repeatedly rebuilt after being demolished by successive
Muslim rulers.
Source
:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Muslim_conquests_in_the_
Indian_subcontinent