This
topic covers all important scriptures of Aryans / Hindus in India.
There is a difference between Hindus and Aryans. First let us
understand step by step history and then we will understand various
scriptures.
1.
History :
There
were 2 main cult in past. 1st was Moon Cult and 2nd was of Sun
worshippers known as Aryans.
The Moon Cult tribe known as Chaldees
and Edenites of Wodan and El worshipped Moon including Mother
and Son (Matriarchst) cult i.e. worshipping Goddess, devil, tortoise,
bull, scorpio, crocodile and snake worship, performing human sacrifice,
witchcraft, etc.
Amazons were part of Moon Cult
tribe.
There
were 4 categories of Amazon women warriors in Eden :
• |
|
• |
Elf, |
• |
Daughters
of Dvalin Dwarf and, |
• |
Chaldees.
|
The
Moon Cult tribe lived in Eden. The Edda definitely places Eden
at the Upper Euphrates called Uimer, the Omiras of the Greeks.
The
history of Amazons starts from Eden located on Upper Euphrates.
There are 2 Edens. One is located at Upper Euphrates the second
is located at Indus Valley (Sindhu) which was formed by King Thor
/ Indra / Adam.
• |
The
history of Aryans starts with Angiras / Ali.
|
• |
The
ancient Aryan worship started with Sun which included
signs like cross i.e. + and Swastik. |
• |
After
the marriage of Thor with Eve who was an Aryan Goth but
was raised by Chaldees. |
• |
The
tradition of Tombstones started with Aryans. The hand
symbol found on Tombstones of Aryans represents the first
Aryan King Thor / Indra / Adam. |
The Right Hand on Tombstones shows
sun-wise right-hand direction of the Aryan Solar-cult.
To
know more about Tombstones Click
here.
2. Arya / Aryan :
Arya / Aryan means noble. More
than a religion it's a civilization according to Veds it consists
of 5 divisions. 1. Brahmin = Priests 2. Kshatriya = Warriors 3.
Vaishya = Businessman 4. Shudra = Service oriented people and
5. Nishad = Boatsman.
3. Brahmins and Aryan / Arya Brahmins :
Brahmins
:
In
ancient times the knowledgeable and learned were called Brahmins.
They were not only temple priest but also kings. It was later
that the tasks were divided where temple priests were Brahmins
and Kshatriyas were warriors and kings.
When
a person says he is a Brahmin his ancestors can be of Chaldees
and Edenites Moon Cult or Sun Worshipping Aryan.
Rishi
/ Sage Bhrigu was a Brahmin who was from Phrygia also known as
"The Land of Lions" which is at present in Turkey. He
was of Chaldees and Edenites Moon Cult.
Bhrigu got married to Khyati who
was daughter of Daksh / Cain. Daksh / Cain was son of King Thor
/ Indra / Adam.
In
Brahmins there is Gotra which means lineage. When a person says
I am of Gautam Gotra it means that he is of Sage Gautam lineage.
When the lineage of Rishi was not known they were said to be created
by Brahma (creator).
Example
: According to Purans the 10 mind born sons of Brahma are
Angiras, Atri, Brighu, Daksh, Kratu, Mareechi, Narad, Pulastya,
Pulah and Vashishth. These were Priest Kings and when their lineage
is not found in any written records they are said to be created
by Lord Brahma who is also known as creator.
Aryan
Brahmins :
The
First Aryan King as Thor / Ikshvaku / Indra / Adam of Angiras
/ Ali Dynasty (Great Grandson of Angiras / Ali) hence, technically
speaking Aryan word is only related to Angiras Dynasty and its
descendants this is the reason why Sumerians, Persians, Akkadians,
Alexander the Great, Cyrus, Darius, Achilles and Angiras / Ali
descendants living in India are called Aryans.
Sage
Angiras / Ali, Gautam / Gaudumu, Kakishivan / Ausija come under
Aryan Brahmins as they belong to Angiras / Ali dynasty of Sun
worshipping Aryans.
4. Split in Aryans :
There was a split in Aryans where
in Zoroastrians sided with Asurs and others sided with Devtas
and the first official religion started as Zoroastrian by zarathustra
/ Zoroaster.
It won't be wrong if we conclude that the patrons of the epics
and the Purans, were in favor of the Devs while the patrons of
the Avesta were against the Devs. Consequently, the followers
of the epic-puranic traditions were opposed to the Asurs while
the followers of the Avestan traditions were in favor of the Asurs.
This inversion of patronage and this opposition in concepts was
never very clear since these people lived separately in India
and Iran, developing their culture and traditions separately.
However this isolation was never perfect. Often there were exchange
of ideas between India and Iran. Consequently there were Asurs
described in the Epics and Purans in good light such as Mahabali
and Vrishaparvan and there were narrations in the epics and Purans
were the Devs, especially their leader Thor / Indra, described
in a bad light.
5. Veds, Avesta and Aryan Nations :
Veds records all the events and
incidents which took place in Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Central Asia,
Indus, etc.
Veds and Avesta were written together
and they share few common Gods like Sun (Mitra / Mithra) and Varun.
List
of Aryan nations as per Avesta :
The Avestan book of Vendidad starts
with a list of sixteen nations (Chapter 1, 1-16), the first being
Airyanem Vaejo or Airyana Vaeja.
Persia not Part of the Original
Listing of Vendidad Lands :
The
Vendidad, and indeed the entire Avesta, does not mention Persia
or Media. This was because Persia and Media became nations after
the Avestan canon was closed. However, The Achaemenian Persian
Kings (c. 700 - 330 BCE) repeatedly proclaimed their Aryan heritage.
To
view Sixteen
Nations of the Vendidad and other Aryan nations Click
here.
6. Exchange of knowledge :
Veds
do not contain Matriarchst Cult it was only after death of Thor
/ Indra that Matriarchst Cult ideology was merged and worship
of Goddess started.
After
many centuries of death of King Thor / Indra / Adam due to matrimonial
and other alliances the Matriarchst Cult merged with Sun worshipping
Aryans in India but this happened after many centuries.
While
compared to West the East i.e. India had always remained peaceful.
In India all ideologies were welcomed and knowledge started to
grow. During this period Veds were left untouched but various
other scriptures were composed by various intellectuals known
as Brahmins who lived outside India. Based on this many school
of thought opened known as Shakha (branch).
This
is the reason why the original scripture of Aryans is Veds and
other texts are not given much importance as compared to Veds.
7. Asurs (Assyrians) and Early Migration of Aryans into India
:
According
to Lieutenant Colonel Laurence Austine Waddell :
The
Makers of Civilization in Race and History :
Here,
7th century B.C. is a very important time frame as it explains
the cause of first migration of Aryans towards India.
1. |
Mesopotamia
of the Sumerian period had been for long a homeland of the
Early Aryan ruling race, whose later eastern branch had
migrated to Gangetic India as the Indo-Aryans about the
beginning of the seventh century B.C. |
2. |
It
was natural that the remnant of the Kassi or Kashi Dynasty
with their clansmen should return to their old home on expulsion
from Babylonia by the Semites and we find members of this
Kashi clan amongst the emigrants to India, the road to which
from Asia Minor and Syria ran from their old capital on
the Upper Euphrates. |
3. |
Still
further, I observed that the last historical king of the
Khatti or Hittites, namely, WI-SI-TI-the-Hero with his capita
at Carchemish in Upper-Syria, was identical with VICITRA
(or "Wicitra")-the-Hero, of the Kuru Line, the
father of the First traditional King of Gangetic India (Dhrita-Rashtra)
who was the first semi-historical king of Gangetic India
and who in his old age was the contemporary of The Great
War of tke Bharats (or Khattiyo) for the partition of Gangetic
India, at the dawn I of the historical period in Gangetic
India.
These
significant new historical facts, the details of which
are fully given in my forthcoming "Origin of Indian
Civllization," conclusively fixed not only the fact
of that Great Migration of Aryans of the Kuru line to
Gangetic India as the Indo-Aryans, but also showed that
it came mainly from Eastern Kur or Asia Minor and Syria
of the Hittites, and consisted of the remnants of the
Sumerian or Aryan stock left there with accretions from
Persia and there was also disclosed the Cause of that
Great Migration to Gangetic India, which brought there
the official King-Lists and Chronicles of the Early Aryans,
and its exact Date.
|
Cause
of "The Great Migration" of Aryan Remnants from Eastern
Kur or Asia Minor (and Syria) to Gangetic India and its date
:
The
immediate cause which led to this Great Migration of the Kurus,
as the remnants of the "Sumerians" or Early Aryan stock
left in Kur or Eastern Asia Minor, including Syria-Phoenicia and
Kurdistan, was obviously the devastating and annihilating war
of extermination waged by the notorious Semitic Assyrian king
Sargon II against the cluster of old mountain states of Eastern
Asia Minor to the north and west of Assyria and Babylonia, from
Lake Van in Armenia to Cilicia and Syria-Phoenicia in the west.
It
was the last straw after the series of similar ruthless conquests
by his predecessers, who brutally butchered their victims, crucifying
and flaying them alive and transporting many of the remainder
wholesale into captivity, as they did likewise to the Jews.
Sargon
II captured the southern Hittite capital Carchemish in 717 B.C.
and killed its king Wisiti-the-Hero, the last of the once mighty
Hittite kings and reduced Carchemish to a province of his empire
under an Assyrian governor. And concurrently the Cimmerians had
occupied the greater part of Cappadocia in the north.
Thus,
caught between the two jaws of a vice, the Great Migration of
the Kurus, with their princes and priests and their families and
army of retainers to Gangetic India is disclosed as a great flight
of refugees fleeing from Carchemish and Syria-Phoenicia, Kurdistan
and Armenia, to escape from the atrocities of the barbarous Assyrian
(Asur) victors, and the probable attack by the Cimmerians on the
north.
This
now explains for the first time the cryptic reference in the early
post-Vedic literature that the Kurus were driven out of their
old home of Kuru-Land by a curse and it also explains why the
"Asurs" are called "devils" in Indian literature.
Assyrians
are also known as Asurs in Veds.
Just
as a carrom striker hits coins same way the attack of Assyrians
compelled Aryans and many other tribes to migrate. This became
base for forming new religions.
To
know more about Asurs (Assyrians) and Aryan conflict Click
here.

For
further reading Click
here.
8. Aryan Scriptures in India :

Click
on the image to enlarge
To view the List of historical Indian texts Click
here.
For
overview about what is Veds, Shakas, Upnishads and Purans Click
here.
9. Starting of Different religions :
Zoroastrianism :
Zoroastrianism was founded in
Persia in the 6th century BCE by the priest Zarathustra, known
to the Greeks as Zoroaster but before being called Zoroastians
Iranians were and still are Aryans.
Judaism :
The
history of the Jews and Judaism can be divided into five periods
:
1.
Ancient Israel before Judaism, from the beginnings to 586 BCE
and,
2.
The beginning of Judaism in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE.
The
time period between 6th and 5th BCE is very important beause this
is the time when different philosophies based on Sumerian Aryan
civilization took form of different religion.
10. Starting of different religions in India :
Buddhism
and Jainism was used as a strategy by Kings. Both these religions
were started by Kings.
Founder
of Buddhism :
Buddhism
was founded by Siddharth Gautam who was a Shakya (Shak) belonging
to Sage Gautam clan. Siddhartha Gautama was born in c. 563 B.C.
or 480 B.C. in Lumbini, Shakya Republic. Suddhodana was his father
and Maya Devi was his mother. Siddharth Gautam's wife was Yashodhra
and they had a son named Rahul.
Founder
of Jainism :
Jainism
was founded by Vardhaman also known as Mahavir. He was born in
599 B.C. in Kshatriyakund, Vaishali (in modern day Bihar). His
parents are King Siddharth (not Siddharth Gautam) and Queen Trishala.
Vardhaman's siblings are Nandivardhan and Sudarshan.
Vardhman
was married to Yashoda and had a daughter Priyadarshan.
King
Siddharth the father of Vardhaman was the ruler of the Nat or
Jnatri clan in Kshatriya Kundagrama, a suburb of Vaishali (Basarh
in modern-day Bihar)
Vardhaman
was of Aryan Ikshvaku dynasty i.e. of King Thor / Indra / Adam.
Creation
of religions in India :
The
Western side countries of India was going through wars and Kings
living in India knew that by wars they can win over a nation but
can't rule it for a longer period of time.
The
kings came up with a strategy that they will spread a message
of peace and non-violence to such an extent that people specially
Non-aryans don't take weapons in their hands.
They
wanted the Non-aryans to convert to their made religion because
the Non-aryans didnt have any specific religion or belief system.
Aryan
Brahmins and Brahmins opposed this strategy because they didn't
want their scriptures to go in hands of other Non-aryans. Hence,
the kings who were Aryans and already knew Aryan scriptures modified
the Aryan scriptures, made few changes but kept same mantras,
principles, hymns, symbols like swastik, lotus, etc. and created
new religion based on peace, celibacy, fasting, becoming monk
and extreme non-violence.
The
strategy was simple containing many parts as following :
1. |
Propagate
their new ideology and spread it to different nations
and converting Non-aryans. |
2. |
If
the King of any other country surrenders without war its
good otherwise once the people of the opposite country
are converted or start believing their religion created
any reason to start a war so that they can justify it
and take over that nation. |
3. |
The
biggest fear after winning a war over a nation is revolt
from people of that nation but since they were supporting
their religion they won't oppose them and even if they
oppose they won't fight because of the extreme level of
non-violence taught to them. |
4. |
This
is how religion based on non-violence was used a tool
to takeover other nations. The Kings who portrayed themselves
to be monks and left their kingdom to attain God and Salvation
actually ruled their kingdom from forests. |
11. Counter from Aryan Brahmins :
The
Aryan Brahmins and Brahmins knew this strategy but they remained
silent because of their alliance with Aryan kshatriyas and Kings.
The
Kings started religion based on non-violence as a tool to grab
other nations and after their death slowly after a period of time
their strategy started to backfire and other Non-Aryans started
to become monks, challenge Aryan and Brahmin scriptures. Not only
this they started to oppose Aryans and Brahmins and started false
propaganda against them and created immense level of hatred against
Aryan Brahmins and Brahmins.
To
stop the immense attack, hatred and false propaganda coming from
non-aryans based on ideology which was originally taken from Aryans
as a counter Upnishads, Purans, Ramayan, Mahabharat, etc. scriptures
were written by Brahmins and Aryan Brahmins but, they never modified
veds because it was the origin of Aryans and Brahmins and they
didn't want other Non-aryans to learn it.
The
Aryans who came from Danube River had developed sumerian civilization
and when Aryan Brahmins and Brahmins migrated from Near Asia to
India they had information in framents as much was lost in war
and what material they had they converted it from Sumerian language
to Sanskrit hence, they had made errors in translation.
Not
only this the Chaldeans who also migrated towards India due to
Assur (Assyrian) attack they also contributed in Purans. The Chaldeans
had fragments of information with them and inorder to complete
it they made a story and adjusted that information in it Purans.
Hence, you can find Chaldean cult and its infulence in Purans
and other scriptures.
Here,
if we observe the timelines we can clearly what happend and why.
1. |
Asurs
(Assyrians) attack on Aryans which lead to 1st migration
of Aryans towards India in 7th century B.C. |
2. |
Starting
of Buddhism and Jainism by Sun worshipper Aryan Kings
in 5th century B.C. |
3. |
Counter
by Aryan Brahmins and Brahmins by Upnishads, Ramayan,
Mahabharat, etc. in 5th century B.C. |
4. |
2nd
migration of Aryans and other communities in
India after 633 - 654 A.D. due
to Arab invasion. |
12. Starting of Hinduism as a religion :
In
past Aryans and Non-aryans used to live in India (Bharat / Aryavrat).
The first attack of Arabs happened on Sasanian Empire on 633 -
654 A.D. on Mesopotamia, Caucasus, Persia, and Greater Khorasan
under Rashidun Caliphate. Iraq was at that time part of Persian
Sasanian Empire.
In
the first half of the 8th century A.D., a series of battles took
place between the Umayyad Caliphate and the Indian kingdoms to
the east of the Indus River.
During
the attack of Rashidun Caliphate many tribes and warriors started
to migrate into India for safety and not to get converted into
Islam. This was second migration of Aryans into India.
All
the warriors and their tribes who came to India were supported
by Aryans in India because they already knew them.
In
India the Non-aryans had been into the ideology of non-violence
spread by Buddhism and Jainism. It is difficult to say whether
they believed in non-violance or were they cowards, cunning and
shrewd in not fighting Arabs.
When
the Arab forces attacked India the Non-aryans of India did not
fight against the Arabs rather it was the Aryans of India, Iraq,
Iran, etc. and Non-aryans of these nations who got together in
India and fought against Arabs.
When
Aryan Kshatriyas (warriors) and Aryan Brahmins (priests) got killed
in war fighting against Arabs the wives, daughter and all the
Aryan Kshatriyas women got together and did Jauhar (Self-immolation
by a group of women) and the wife of Aryan Brahmins (priests)
became Sati (Self-immolation by a individual woman) rather than
falling in the hands of Arabs. Such was the extent of Arab inhuman
and barbaric invasion and torture that women preferred to burn
themselves alive rather than being captive of Arabs.
The
slaughter of Indian Aryan Kshatriyas (warriors), Aryan Brahmins
(priests) and Brahmins (priests) was so immense that even at present
in 2021 A.D. the total population of Aryan Kshatryas, Aryan Brahmins
(priests) and Brahmins is not more than 5 % in India.
The
word Hindu :
In
the 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I. The Punjab region,
called Sapt Sindhu in the Vedas, is called Hapta Hindu in Zend
Avesta. The 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I mentions the
province of Hi[n]dush, referring to northwestern India. The people
of India were referred to as Hinduvan (Hindus) and Hindavi was
used as the adjective for Indian in the 8th century text Chachnama.
The term 'Hindu' in these ancient records is an ethno-geographical
term and did not refer to a religion. The Arabic equivalent Al-Hind
likewise referred to the country of India.
Certain
cuneiform inscriptions found in Persia confirm that the word Hindu
was used in those days to refer to the people of the region near
the Indus River. Reference to the word is also found in the Zoroastrian
scripture, the Zend Avesta. It is said that when the Persian King
Darius 1 extended his empire to the borders of India in 517 BC,
he included many native people from the region into his army who
were referred to as Hindus. We have therefore reasons to believe
that the word Hindu was secular in origin rather than religious.
Because
of Arab invasion many Aryans and other tribes crossed Sindhu river
and entered India Since the locals did not know what to call them
they started to call them Hindu.
Just
like different fruits are kept in a basket same way all the people
who came to India from Sindhu because of Arab invasions were called
as Hindus and Hinduism became a ideology where all are welcomed.
People with different ideologies, beliefs, faith, etc were put
into this one word Hindu and it formed as religion. Even the Non-aryans
of India were called Hindus.
Thus,
all Hindus are not Aryans and all Aryans are not Hindus.